Neelakshi Hudda1, John L Durant1,2, Alexandra Nemeth3, Phyllis Mann3, Jocelyn Petitto4, Douglas Brugge5, Benjamin C Nephew6. 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. 2. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, USA. 4. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Worcester, MA, USA. 5. Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA. 6. Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rodents used in scientific research are typically housed in cages containing natural bedding materials. Despite extensive evidence of biological harm from inhaled particulate matter (PM), relatively little work has been performed to measure bedding-generated PM exposure in caged animals used in basic science research. Our objectives were to determine whether bedding-generated PM was present in significant concentrations in rodent cages and to identify the main factors affecting the accumulation and attenuation of bedding-generated PM inside cages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured PM2.5 concentrations in cages containing common bedding materials (pine, aspen, paper, and corncob) with filter top isolator absent or present on the cages. PM2.5 concentrations were monitored with rats inside cages as well as during artificial manipulation of the bedding (designed to simulate rodent activity). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Upon rodent digging or mechanical/manual stirring, all four bedding materials produced significant increases in PM2.5 concentrations (as much as 100-200 µg/m3 PM2.5, 50- to 100-fold higher than during periods of no rodent activity), and concentrations in cages fitted with filter tops were an order of magnitude higher than in cages without filter tops. Elevated concentrations were sustained for longer durations in cages with filter tops (5-10 minutes) compared to cages with only bar lids (0-2 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that standard laboratory housing conditions can expose rodents to substantial levels of PM2.5. Bedding-generated PM has potential implications as an environmental agent in rodent studies.
OBJECTIVES: Rodents used in scientific research are typically housed in cages containing natural bedding materials. Despite extensive evidence of biological harm from inhaled particulate matter (PM), relatively little work has been performed to measure bedding-generated PM exposure in caged animals used in basic science research. Our objectives were to determine whether bedding-generated PM was present in significant concentrations in rodent cages and to identify the main factors affecting the accumulation and attenuation of bedding-generated PM inside cages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured PM2.5 concentrations in cages containing common bedding materials (pine, aspen, paper, and corncob) with filter top isolator absent or present on the cages. PM2.5 concentrations were monitored with rats inside cages as well as during artificial manipulation of the bedding (designed to simulate rodent activity). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Upon rodent digging or mechanical/manual stirring, all four bedding materials produced significant increases in PM2.5 concentrations (as much as 100-200 µg/m3 PM2.5, 50- to 100-fold higher than during periods of no rodent activity), and concentrations in cages fitted with filter tops were an order of magnitude higher than in cages without filter tops. Elevated concentrations were sustained for longer durations in cages with filter tops (5-10 minutes) compared to cages with only bar lids (0-2 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that standard laboratory housing conditions can expose rodents to substantial levels of PM2.5. Bedding-generated PM has potential implications as an environmental agent in rodent studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
PM2.5; Particulate matter (PM); bar lids; bedding material; cage ventilation; endotoxin; filter top isolator; microenvironment; rodent bedding; rodent cages
Authors: Neil E Alexis; John C Lay; Kirby Zeman; William E Bennett; David B Peden; Joleen M Soukup; Robert B Devlin; Susanne Becker Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Tanya E Whiteside; Julius E Thigpen; Grace E Kissling; Mary G Grant; Diane Forsythe Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Miriam E Gerlofs-Nijland; Damien van Berlo; Flemming R Cassee; Roel P F Schins; Kate Wang; Arezoo Campbell Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 9.400
Authors: R Guerra; E Vera-Aguilar; M Uribe-Ramirez; G Gookin; J Camacho; A R Osornio-Vargas; V Mugica-Alvarez; R Angulo-Olais; A Campbell; J Froines; T M Kleinman; A De Vizcaya-Ruiz Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Joao R F Batalha; Paulo H N Saldiva; Robert W Clarke; Brent A Coull; Rebecca C Stearns; Joy Lawrence; G G Krishna Murthy; Petros Koutrakis; John J Godleski Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Benjamin C Nephew; Alexandra Nemeth; Neelakshi Hudda; Gillian Beamer; Phyllis Mann; Jocelyn Petitto; Ryan Cali; Marcelo Febo; Praveen Kulkarni; Guillaume Poirier; Jean King; John L Durant; Doug Brugge Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 6.498