Literature DB >> 29671876

Immunotherapy and the role of imaging.

Brett W Carter1, Priya R Bhosale1, Wei T Yang1.   

Abstract

Significant advances in the genetic and molecular characterization of cancer have led to the development of effective immunotherapies. These therapeutics help the host immune system recognize cancer as foreign, promote the immune system, and relieve the inhibition that allows growth and spread of tumors. Experience with various immunotherapies, particularly the immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, has demonstrated that unique patterns of response may be encountered that cannot be adequately captured by traditional response criteria, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which have been used primarily with cytotoxic chemotherapies. In response to these observations, several novel response criteria have been developed to evaluate patients who receive immunotherapy, including immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), and immune RECIST (iRECIST). These criteria are typically used in conjunction with RECIST version 1.1 in the clinical trial setting, because approval of new therapeutics by the US Food and Drug Administration relies on the responses derived from RECIST version 1.1. Finally, a wide variety of immune-related adverse events may affect patients who receive immunotherapy, many of which can be identified on imaging studies such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 2-deoxy-2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In this review, the authors present the role of imaging in the evaluation of patients treated with immunotherapy, including the background and application of irRC, irRECIST, and iRECIST; the imaging of immune-related adverse events; and future directions in advanced imaging of immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:2906-22.
© 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  imaging; immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST); immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST); immune-related response criteria (irRC); immunotherapy; response criteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29671876     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.

Authors:  O Humbert; N Cadour; M Paquet; R Schiappa; M Poudenx; D Chardin; D Borchiellini; D Benisvy; M J Ouvrier; C Zwarthoed; A Schiazza; M Ilie; H Ghalloussi; P M Koulibaly; J Darcourt; J Otto
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  The role of radiology in the evaluation of the immunotherapy efficacy.

Authors:  Marco Calandri; Federica Solitro; Valeria Angelino; Federica Moretti; Andrea Veltri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Abdominal CT manifestations of adverse events to immunotherapy: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Pierpaolo Biondetti; Dushyant Sahani; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09

Review 5.  Imaging-based Biomarkers for Predicting and Evaluating Cancer Immunotherapy Response.

Authors:  Minghao Wu; Yanyan Zhang; Yuwei Zhang; Ying Liu; Mingjie Wu; Zhaoxiang Ye
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 6.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 7.  [Tumor assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy : Tumor response, progression and pseudoprogression].

Authors:  S Foller; H Oppel-Heuchel; M-O Grimm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Considerations when treating high-grade pediatric glioma patients with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Erin Crotty; Kira Downey; Lauren Ferrerosa; Catherine Flores; Bindu Hegde; Scott Raskin; Eugene Hwang; Nicholas Vitanza; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.618

9.  ERK Inhibition Improves Anti-PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Preclinical Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kelly E Henry; Kyeara N Mack; Veronica L Nagle; Mike Cornejo; Adam O Michel; Ian L Fox; Maria Davydova; Thomas R Dilling; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 10.  Immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of atypical responses after immunotherapy.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Cesare Maino; Maria Ragusi; Marco Porta; Davide Gandola; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Teresa Paola Giandola; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.