Literature DB >> 31759960

State-Level Variations in the Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries: An Analysis of the 2015 to 2017 Physician and Other Supplier Data.

Bian Liu1, Kavita Dharmarajan2, Claudia I Henschke3, Emanuela Taioli4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is an important secondary prevention measure to reduce lung cancer mortality. The goal of this study was to assess state-level variations in LCS among the US elderly during the first 3 years since Medicare began its LCS reimbursement policy in 2015.
METHODS: This ecological study examined the relations between LCS utilization density, defined as the number of low-dose CT (LDCT) or shared decision-making and counseling (SDMC) services per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries derived from the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier public use file, and state-level factors from several publicly available data sources. The study included Kruskal-Wallis tests and a cluster analysis.
RESULTS: In 2017, the median utilization density per 1,000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries was 3.32 for LDCT and 0.46 for SDMC, which was 24 and 13 times the 2015 level, respectively. From 2015 to 2017, the total number of unique providers billed for LCS increased from 222 to 3,444 for LDCT imaging and from 20 to 523 for SDMC. Higher utilizations for both LDCT and SDMC services tended to concentrate in the northeastern and upper Midwest states than in the southwest states. The cluster of states with high utilization density did not include those states with the most lung cancer mortality and/or smoking prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: A steady increase was noted in LCS utilization since Medicare began its reimbursement policy. The utilization and its growth varied across the United States and differed between LDCT imaging and SDMC, indicating large growth potentials for LCS and for states with high lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; geographic variations; low-dose CT; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making and counseling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31759960      PMCID: PMC7768942          DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  22 in total

1.  The Landscape of US Lung Cancer Screening Services.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Juan Wisnivesky; Emanuela Taioli; Bian Liu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Deffebach; Miranda Pappas; Bernadette Zakher; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Lung Cancer Screening Inconsistent With U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; V Paul Doria-Rose; Ashwini Soman; Carrie N Klabunde; Ralph S Caraballo; Simone C Gray; Keisha A Houston; Mary C White
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Offering lung cancer screening to high-risk medicare beneficiaries saves lives and is cost-effective: an actuarial analysis.

Authors:  Bruce S Pyenson; Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Rowena Yip; Ellynne Dec
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-08

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of the Shared Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening Among Medicare Enrollees.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Shawn Nishi; Jie Zhou; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Access to Lung Cancer Screening Services: Preliminary Analysis of Geographic Service Distribution Using the ACR Lung Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Paniz Charkhchi; Giselle E Kolenic; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Alison T Brenner; Teri L Malo; Marjorie Margolis; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Shynah James; Maihan B Vu; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Geographic Availability of Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States, 2017.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Parisa Bozorgi; Logan M Lebrón; Sarah E Bills; Linda J Hazlett; Ruth C Carlos; Jennifer C King
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  7 in total

1.  Protocol to evaluate an enterprise-wide initiative to increase access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lewis; Lucy B Spalluto; Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Samuel M Aguayo; Providencia Morales; Rick Avila; Carolyn M Audet; Beth Prusaczyk; Christopher J Lindsell; Carol Callaway-Lane; Robert S Dittus; Timothy J Vogus; Pierre P Massion; Heather M Limper; Sunil Kripalani; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Organizational Readiness for Lung Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Lucy B Spalluto; Jennifer A Lewis; Deonni Stolldorf; Vivian M Yeh; Carol Callaway-Lane; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Christopher G Slatore; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke; Timothy J Vogus; Pierre P Massion; Drew Moghanaki; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.240

Review 3.  Implementation of low-dose CT screening in two different health care systems: Mount Sinai Healthcare System and Phoenix VA Health Care System.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Artit Jirapatnakul; Rowena Yip; Vivian Reccoppa; Charlene Benjamin; Tserling Llamo; Angel Williams; Simon Liu; Daniel Max; Samuel M Aguayo; Providencia Morales; Brian J Igel; Hamed Abbaszadegan; Peter A Fredricks; Daniel P Garcia; Paska A Permana; Janet Fawcett; Samir Sultan; Lorenza A Murphy
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02

4.  "It's Really Like Any Other Study": Rural Radiology Facilities Performing Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Sara E Golden; Tara Thomas; Sarah Bumatay; Jackilen Shannon; Melinda Davis
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-12

5.  Bivariate Spatial Pattern between Smoking Prevalence and Lung Cancer Screening in US Counties.

Authors:  Bian Liu; Jeremy Sze; Lihua Li; Katherine A Ornstein; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Gianluca Milanese; Stefano Sestini; Federica Sabia; Colin Jacobs; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Alfonso Marchianò; Nicola Sverzellati; Ugo Pastorino
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Ella A Kazerooni; Jamie L Studts; Robert A Smith; Priti Bandi; Ann Goding Sauer; Megan Cotter; Helmneh M Sineshaw; Ahmedin Jemal; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.