| Literature DB >> 31758757 |
Valentina Massa1, Laura Avagliano1, Paolo Grazioli1, Sandra C P De Castro2, Chiara Parodi1, Dawn Savery2, Patrizia Vergani3, Serena Cuttin4, Patrizia Doi1, Gaetano Bulfamante1, Andrew J Copp2, Nicholas D E Greene2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Cited2; acetylation profile; neural tube defects; neurodevelopment; p53
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31758757 PMCID: PMC7004172 DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Birth Defects Res Impact factor: 2.344
Figure 1Acetylation status is dynamic during human and mouse neural tube development. (a) Cells staining for acetylated‐histone H4 antibody are present in the normal developing human neural tube (Control), both at 9 and 20 WG. Note positive‐staining cells also in the spinal cord of a 21 WG individual with spina bifida (Case). Bar represents 250 μm. The orange line represent the level of histological section (lumbar for all analyzed fetuses). (b) Quantification of acetylated‐histone H4 staining: the median value is shown as a horizontal line inside the boxes; upper and lower limits of the boxes represent upper and lower quartiles, respectively; whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values. Among normal fetuses (controls), an early stage of gestation (9 WG) has a higher number of acetylated‐histone H4 positive cells per unit area than stages from 12 WG onward. The fetus with spina bifida (case) shows a similar density of positive cells as unaffected individuals of a comparable stage. (c) Western blot demonstrates the dynamic acetylation profile of wild‐type mouse embryos at different developmental stages. Note the band at 50 KDa which has a peak of expression intensity at E9.5. (d) The acetylation profile of wild‐type and Cited2 embryos without (closed) and with (open) exencephaly. A 50 KDa band is upregulated in Cited2 embryos compared with wild‐type, with particularly strong acetylation in mutants with open neural tube
Figure 2p53 acetylation contribution to the Cited2 −/− NTD phenotype. (a) Quantification of acetylated p53, normalized to actin expression, shows an increase in affected Cited2 embryos (three embryos per pool per genotype were used. Three replicates were performed). Bars show standard deviation. (b) Relative western blot analysis of acetylated p53. (c) In contrast, total p53 gene expression (qPCR) does not differ between Cited2 genotypes at E9.5. (d) Chemical inhibition of p53 activity using pifithrin‐α results in a significant decrease in the frequency of NTDs in Cited2 embryos (Fisher's exact test: *p = 0.023)