Tiam M Saffari1,2, Femke Mathot3, Allen T Bishop1, Alexander Y Shin1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive- and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nerve regeneration involves multiple processes, which enhance blood supply that can be promoted by growth factors. Currently, tools are lacking to visualize the vascularization patterns in transplanted nerves in vivo. The purpose of this study was to describe three-dimensional visualization of the vascular system in the rat sciatic nerve and to quantify angiogenesis of nerve reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 Lewis rats (weighing 250-300 g), 10 mm sciatic nerve gaps were repaired with ipsilateral reversed autologous nerve grafts. At 12 and 16 weeks of sacrifice, Microfil® contrast compound was injected in the aorta. Nerve autografts (N = 12) and contralateral untreated nerves (N = 12) were harvested and cleared while preserving the vasculature. The amount of vascularization was measured by quantifying the vascular surface area using conventional photography (two-dimensional) and the vascular volume was calculated with microcomputed tomography (three-dimensional). For each measurement, a vessel/nerve area ratio was calculated and expressed in percentages (vessel%). RESULTS: The vascular volume measured 3.53 ± 0.43% in autografts and 4.83 ± 0.45% vessels in controls at 12 weeks and 4.95 ± 0.44% and 6.19 ± 0.29% vessels at 16 weeks, respectively. The vascular surface area measured 25.04 ± 2.77% in autografts and 26.87 ± 2.13% vessels in controls at 12 weeks, and 28.11 ± 3.47% and 33.71 ± 2.60% vessels at 16 weeks, respectively. The correlation between both methods was statistically significant (p = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are considered to successfully reflect the degree of vascularization. Application of this technique could be used to visualize and objectively quantify angiogenesis of the transplanted nerve graft. Moreover, this simple method is easily reproducible and could be extrapolated to any other desired target organ ex vivo in small animals to investigate the vascular network.
INTRODUCTION: Nerve regeneration involves multiple processes, which enhance blood supply that can be promoted by growth factors. Currently, tools are lacking to visualize the vascularization patterns in transplanted nerves in vivo. The purpose of this study was to describe three-dimensional visualization of the vascular system in the rat sciatic nerve and to quantify angiogenesis of nerve reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 12 Lewis rats (weighing 250-300 g), 10 mm sciatic nerve gaps were repaired with ipsilateral reversed autologous nerve grafts. At 12 and 16 weeks of sacrifice, Microfil® contrast compound was injected in the aorta. Nerve autografts (N = 12) and contralateral untreated nerves (N = 12) were harvested and cleared while preserving the vasculature. The amount of vascularization was measured by quantifying the vascular surface area using conventional photography (two-dimensional) and the vascular volume was calculated with microcomputed tomography (three-dimensional). For each measurement, a vessel/nerve area ratio was calculated and expressed in percentages (vessel%). RESULTS: The vascular volume measured 3.53 ± 0.43% in autografts and 4.83 ± 0.45% vessels in controls at 12 weeks and 4.95 ± 0.44% and 6.19 ± 0.29% vessels at 16 weeks, respectively. The vascular surface area measured 25.04 ± 2.77% in autografts and 26.87 ± 2.13% vessels in controls at 12 weeks, and 28.11 ± 3.47% and 33.71 ± 2.60% vessels at 16 weeks, respectively. The correlation between both methods was statistically significant (p = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are considered to successfully reflect the degree of vascularization. Application of this technique could be used to visualize and objectively quantify angiogenesis of the transplanted nerve graft. Moreover, this simple method is easily reproducible and could be extrapolated to any other desired target organ ex vivo in small animals to investigate the vascular network.
Authors: D T Connolly; D M Heuvelman; R Nelson; J V Olander; B L Eppley; J J Delfino; N R Siegel; R M Leimgruber; J Feder Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Lyubomir Zagorchev; Pierre Oses; Zhen W Zhuang; Karen Moodie; Mary Jo Mulligan-Kehoe; Michael Simons; Thierry Couffinhal Journal: J Angiogenes Res Date: 2010-03-05
Authors: Simona Parrinello; Ilaria Napoli; Sara Ribeiro; Patrick Wingfield Digby; Marina Fedorova; David B Parkinson; Robin D S Doddrell; Masanori Nakayama; Ralf H Adams; Alison C Lloyd Journal: Cell Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Mattias K Sköld; Mikael Svensson; Jack Tsao; Thomas Hultgren; Thomas Landegren; Thomas Carlstedt; Staffan Cullheim Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Tiam M Saffari; Femke Mathot; Patricia F Friedrich; Allen T Bishop; Alexander Y Shin Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: T M Saffari; F Mathot; R Thaler; A J van Wijnen; A T Bishop; A Y Shin Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: Johannes C Heinzel; Viola Oberhauser; Claudia Keibl; Barbara Schädl; Nicole V Swiadek; Gregor Längle; Helen Frick; Cyrill Slezak; Cosima Prahm; Johannes Grillari; Jonas Kolbenschlag; David Hercher Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-07-22