Literature DB >> 31758592

Oral Anticoagulant Prescription Trends, Profile Use, and Determinants of Adherence in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Sylvie Perreault1, Simon de Denus1,2, Brian White-Guay3, Robert Côté4, Mireille E Schnitzer1, Marie-Pierre Dubé3,4, Marc Dorais5, Jean-Claude Tardif2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Data on oral anticoagulant (OAC) uptake and pattern of use are limited. Real-life data in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are important for understanding patient exposure. A cohort study of new OAC users was built to assess trends of drug use from 2011 to 2017, persistence rate, switching rate, adherence level, and predictors of adherence.
METHODS: We built a cohort using the Régie d'Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) and Med-Echo administrative databases of new adult OAC users within 1 year following hospitalization with a diagnosis of AF. New users of OAC were defined as having no OAC claims in the year before cohort entry. We assessed trends of OAC use; persistence rate, defined as a gap between refills of no longer than two times the duration of the previous prescriptions; and adherence level, defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a 1-year period following initiation. Predictors of nonadherence (PDC less than 80%) were analyzed using logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 33,311 incident OAC users. Of total OAC claims, the proportions of warfarin claims decreased from 77.9% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2017, with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) accounting for 87.3% of claims, of which apixaban and rivaroxaban accounted for 60.1% and 23.4%, respectively, by the end of 2017. One year after OAC initiation, persistence rates ranged from 53% with warfarin to 77% with a high dose of apixaban. Approximately 75% of incident OAC users were considered "adherent" (PDC 80% or more), with a mean PDC of 95.6-98.1%, compared with "nonadherent," with a mean PDC varying between 43.1% and 50.7%. Older age, female sex, higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc score (to predict thromboembolic risk in AF), prior stroke, and treatment with chronic cardiovascular disease drugs were associated with high adherence levels.
CONCLUSION: The clinical uptake of DOACs increased over time, accounting for 87.3% of prescriptions in 2017. In our study, 25% of new OAC users presented a low adherence level. Adherence to OACs remains a significant challenge in patients with AF.
© 2019 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulant; atrial fibrillation; pattern of use; trend of use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31758592     DOI: 10.1002/phar.2350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  18 in total

1.  Primary care provider payment models and adherence to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lanting Yang; Jingchuan Guo; Qingfeng Liang; Terri V Newman; Walid F Gellad; Inmaculada Hernandez
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2021-12

2.  Feasibility and usability of a mobile health tool on anticoagulation management for patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Mang-Mang Pan; Na Wang; Wei-Wei Wang; Zheng Li; Zhi-Chun Gu; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Severe Obesity: a Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Cheng-Wei Huang; Lewei Duan; Jaejin An; John J Sim; Ming-Sum Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  Case report. Thrombus formation on left atrial appendage clip: surgical exclusion and anticoagulation do not obviate transesophageal echocardiography prior to cardioversion.

Authors:  Saberio Lo Presti; Reza Reyaldeen; Oussama Wazni; Wael Jaber
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 5.  Warfarin dosing strategies evolution and its progress in the era of precision medicine, a narrative review.

Authors:  Amr Mohamed Fahmi; Hazem Elewa; Islam El Jilany
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-03-05

6.  Analysis of Effectiveness, Safety, and Bleeding Related to Rivaroxaban in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Huimin Hou; Ang Li; Liping Zhang; Xiujiao Qin; Yanfang Jiang; Huiying Zhao
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients With Moderate to Severe Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Clara Ting; Megan Rhoten; Jillian Dempsey; Hunter Nichols; John Fanikos; Christian T Ruff
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

8.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Alice Dragomir; Robert Côté; Aurélie Lenglet; Simon de Denus; Marc Dorais; Brian White-Guay; James Brophy; Mireille E Schnitzer; Marie-Pierre Dubé; Jean-Claude Tardif
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Review Article: Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Robert Benamouzig; Maxime Guenoun; David Deutsch; Laurent Fauchier
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.947

10.  Restart TICrH: An Adaptive Randomized Trial of Time Intervals to Restart Direct Oral Anticoagulants after Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Truman J Milling; Steven Warach; S Claiborne Johnston; Byron Gajewski; Todd Costantini; Michelle Price; Jo Wick; Simin Roward; Dinesh Mudaranthakam; Adrienne N Dula; Ben King; Alexander Muddiman; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.