Literature DB >> 31758203

Application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex immediately after practice of a motor sequence does not improve offline gain.

Jing Chen1,2, Austin McCulloch3, Hakjoo Kim3, Taewon Kim3, Joohyun Rhee4, Willem B Verwey3,5, John J Buchanan3, David L Wright6.   

Abstract

Tecchio et al. (J Neurophysiology 104: 1134-1140, 2010) reported that the application of anodal tDCS at primary motor cortex (M1) immediately after practice of a procedural motor skill enhanced consolidation, which in turn improved offline gain. Tecchio et al. noted, however, that this study did not account for known after-effects associated with this form of non-invasive stimulation. The present study was designed to explicitly reevaluate Tecchio et al.'s claim. As in the original study, individuals experienced either anodal or sham stimulation at M1 after practice of a serial reaction time task (SRTT) followed by test trials 15-min later. Two additional novel conditions experienced the test trials after 120-min rather than 15-min thus allowing potential stimulation after-effects to dissipate. The expectation was that if anodal stimulation influences post-practice consolidation leading to offline gain, this effect would be present not only at 15-min but also after 120-min. In agreement with the working hypothesis, findings revealed offline gain at both 15-min and the longer 2-h time period. Unexpectedly, we found no interaction between real and sham conditions. The lack of difference between Real and Sham effects weakens confidence in the potential of post-practice tDCS for consolidation enhancement, while it is more consistent with other claims that decoupling practice and anodal tDCS stimulation in time can reduce the effectiveness of exogenous stimulation for procedural skill gain.

Keywords:  Consolidation; Motor cortex; Procedural learning; tDCS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31758203     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05697-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Wolf Muellbacher; Ulf Ziemann; Joerg Wissel; Nguyet Dang; Markus Kofler; Stefano Facchini; Babak Boroojerdi; Werner Poewe; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Primary motor and premotor cortex in implicit sequence learning--evidence for competition between implicit and explicit human motor memory systems.

Authors:  Shailesh S Kantak; Chaithanya K Mummidisetty; James W Stinear
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances procedural consolidation.

Authors:  Franca Tecchio; Filippo Zappasodi; Giovanni Assenza; Mario Tombini; Stefano Vollaro; Giulia Barbati; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction?

Authors:  Georgios Naros; Marc Geyer; Susanne Koch; Lena Mayr; Tabea Ellinger; Florian Grimm; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Pierre Bellec; Rhonda Amsel; Virginia Penhune; Oury Monchi; Julie Carrier; Stéphane Lehéricy; Habib Benali
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Time- but not sleep-dependent consolidation of tDCS-enhanced visuomotor skills.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Jan Torben Fischer; George Prichard; Cornelius Weiller; Leonardo G Cohen; Brita Fritsch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Brita Fritsch
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Task-specific effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning.

Authors:  Cinthia Maria Saucedo Marquez; Xue Zhang; Stephan Patrick Swinnen; Raf Meesen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Post-training stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs working memory training performance.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Benjamin Katz; Austin Moon; Sheebani Talati; Tessa R Abagis; John Jonides; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Offline low-frequency rTMS of the primary and premotor cortices does not impact motor sequence memory consolidation despite modulation of corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Felix Psurek; Bradley Ross King; Joseph Classen; Jost-Julian Rumpf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ohad Lerner; Jason Friedman; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Baseline sensorimotor GABA levels shape neuroplastic processes induced by motor learning in older adults.

Authors:  Bradley R King; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Elvire Verbaanderd; Kirstin F Heise; Nina Dolfen; Stefan Sunaert; Julien Doyon; Joseph Classen; Dante Mantini; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden; Geneviève Albouy; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.399

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.