Literature DB >> 31757850

Chromosome disentanglement driven via optimal compaction of loop-extruded brush structures.

Sumitabha Brahmachari1,2, John F Marko3,4.   

Abstract

Eukaryote cell division features a chromosome compaction-decompaction cycle that is synchronized with their physical and topological segregation. It has been proposed that lengthwise compaction of chromatin into mitotic chromosomes via loop extrusion underlies the compaction-segregation/resolution process. We analyze this disentanglement scheme via considering the chromosome to be a succession of DNA/chromatin loops-a polymer "brush"-where active extrusion of loops controls the brush structure. Given type-II DNA topoisomerase (Topo II)-catalyzed topology fluctuations, we find that interchromosome entanglements are minimized for a certain "optimal" loop that scales with the chromosome size. The optimal loop organization is in accord with experimental data across species, suggesting an important structural role of genomic loops in maintaining a less entangled genome. Application of the model to the interphase genome indicates that active loop extrusion can maintain a level of chromosome compaction with suppressed entanglements; the transition to the metaphase state requires higher lengthwise compaction and drives complete topological segregation. Optimized genomic loops may provide a means for evolutionary propagation of gene-expression patterns while simultaneously maintaining a disentangled genome. We also find that compact metaphase chromosomes have a densely packed core along their cylindrical axes that explains their observed mechanical stiffness. Our model connects chromosome structural reorganization to topological resolution through the cell cycle and highlights a mechanism of directing Topo II-mediated strand passage via loop extrusion-driven lengthwise compaction.

Keywords:  chromosome topology; cylindrical polymer brush; genome organization; lengthwise compaction; loop extrusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31757850      PMCID: PMC6911191          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906355116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  69 in total

1.  The Energetics and Physiological Impact of Cohesin Extrusion.

Authors:  Laura Vian; Aleksandra Pękowska; Suhas S P Rao; Kyong-Rim Kieffer-Kwon; Seolkyoung Jung; Laura Baranello; Su-Chen Huang; Laila El Khattabi; Marei Dose; Nathanael Pruett; Adrian L Sanborn; Andres Canela; Yaakov Maman; Anna Oksanen; Wolfgang Resch; Xingwang Li; Byoungkoo Lee; Alexander L Kovalchuk; Zhonghui Tang; Steevenson Nelson; Michele Di Pierro; Ryan R Cheng; Ido Machol; Brian Glenn St Hilaire; Neva C Durand; Muhammad S Shamim; Elena K Stamenova; José N Onuchic; Yijun Ruan; Andre Nussenzweig; David Levens; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Rafael Casellas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The relative ratio of condensin I to II determines chromosome shapes.

Authors:  Keishi Shintomi; Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Radial loops and helical coils coexist in metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  J B Rattner; C C Lin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

Authors:  Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Condensin-dependent localisation of topoisomerase II to an axial chromosomal structure is required for sister chromatid resolution during mitosis.

Authors:  Paula A Coelho; Joana Queiroz-Machado; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation.

Authors:  Johan H Gibcus; Kumiko Samejima; Anton Goloborodko; Itaru Samejima; Natalia Naumova; Johannes Nuebler; Masato T Kanemaki; Linfeng Xie; James R Paulson; William C Earnshaw; Leonid A Mirny; Job Dekker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A role of topoisomerase II in linking DNA replication to chromosome condensation.

Authors:  Olivier Cuvier; Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes.

Authors:  Angelo Rosa; Ralf Everaers
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Oligomerization and ATP stimulate condensin-mediated DNA compaction.

Authors:  Ross A Keenholtz; Thillaivillalan Dhanaraman; Roger Palou; Jia Yu; Damien D'Amours; John F Marko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Condensin II drives large-scale folding and spatial partitioning of interphase chromosomes in Drosophila nuclei.

Authors:  Leah F Rosin; Son C Nguyen; Eric F Joyce
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Accidental Ally: Nucleosome Barriers Can Accelerate Cohesin-Mediated Loop Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Ajoy Maji; Ranjith Padinhateeri; Mithun K Mitra
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Linker histone H1.8 inhibits chromatin binding of condensins and DNA topoisomerase II to tune chromosome length and individualization.

Authors:  Pavan Choppakatla; Bastiaan Dekker; Erin E Cutts; Alessandro Vannini; Job Dekker; Hironori Funabiki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The Physical Behavior of Interphase Chromosomes: Polymer Theory and Coarse-Grain Computer Simulations.

Authors:  Angelo Rosa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Loop extrusion driven volume phase transition of entangled chromosomes.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yamamoto; Helmut Schiessel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Shaping the genome via lengthwise compaction, phase separation, and lamina adhesion.

Authors:  Sumitabha Brahmachari; Vinícius G Contessoto; Michele Di Pierro; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 19.160

6.  Chromosome organization by one-sided and two-sided loop extrusion.

Authors:  Edward J Banigan; Aafke A van den Berg; Hugo B Brandão; John F Marko; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  Dispersive forces and resisting spot welds by alternative homolog conjunction govern chromosome shape in Drosophila spermatocytes during prophase I.

Authors:  Luisa Vernizzi; Christian F Lehner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.020

8.  Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes.

Authors:  Eric M Kramer; P A Tayjasanant; Bethan Cordone
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 9.  Mechanisms for Chromosome Segregation in Bacteria.

Authors:  Christos Gogou; Aleksandre Japaridze; Cees Dekker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Multi-contact 3C reveals that the human genome during interphase is largely not entangled.

Authors:  Filipe Tavares-Cadete; Davood Norouzi; Bastiaan Dekker; Yu Liu; Job Dekker
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 15.369

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.