Literature DB >> 31755741

Testicular torsion treatment: the horns of a dilemma?

S Lewis1, L Hopkins1, T Evans1, W Lewis1, R Harries1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Testicular torsion treatment rests on the horns of a dilemma, with widespread national variation in whether the responsible surgical specialty is general surgery or urology, even in hospitals with both general surgery and urology emergency service assets. This study aimed to quantify higher surgical trainee operative experience and confidence in managing suspected testicular torsion in a single UK deanery (Wales).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymised logbook data were obtained via the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme version 10 using the head of school report function for all general surgery (n=53) and urology (n=15) higher surgical trainees, which were combined with the distribution of an electronic self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Median operative scrotal explorations recorded for all general surgery higher surgical trainees and senior general surgery higher surgical trainees (ST7+) was 7 (range 1-22) and 10 (range 1-22), compared with 21 (range 9-64, p=0.00104) and 24 (19-64, p<0.001) for urology higher surgical trainees. The questionnaire response rate was 64.6% (general surgery 31/50, urology 11/15). Confidence levels in assessing adult and paediatric patients were lower in general surgery when compared with urology higher surgical trainees: median adult confidence rate 7/10 compared with 9/10, and paediatric confidence rate 7/10 compared with 8/10 (p<0.001 and p=0.053, respectively). All higher surgical trainees preferred urology as the accountable hospital specialty when both assets were available. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: General surgery higher surgical trainees receive less than 50% of the operative exposure of urology higher surgical trainees in emergency scrotal surgery, which has important implications for curriculum competence development and patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgical education; Surgical training; Testicular torsion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31755741      PMCID: PMC6937606          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  The development of urology as a specialty in Britain.

Authors:  D Innes Williams
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Suspected testicular torsion - urological or general surgical emergency?

Authors:  C Tydeman; K Davenport; D Glancy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Urological litigation in the UK National Health Service (NHS): an analysis of 14 years of successful claims.

Authors:  Nadir I Osman; Gerald N Collins
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The Success and Evolution of a Urological "Boot Camp" for Newly Appointed UK Urology Registrars: Incorporating Simulation, Nontechnical Skills and Assessment.

Authors:  M Young; M Kailavasan; J Taylor; P Cornford; A Colquhoun; M Rochester; V Hanchanale; B Somani; G Nabi; M Garthwaite; R Gowda; F Reeves; B Rai; R Doherty; A Gkentzis; G Athanasiadis; J Patterson; B Wilkinson; A Myatt; C S Biyani; S Jain
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Operative learning curve trajectory in a cohort of surgical trainees.

Authors:  C Brown; T Abdelrahman; N Patel; C Thomas; M J Pollitt; W G Lewis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  A quick guide to survey research.

Authors:  T L Jones; M A J Baxter; V Khanduja
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.