Literature DB >> 21481130

Urological litigation in the UK National Health Service (NHS): an analysis of 14 years of successful claims.

Nadir I Osman1, Gerald N Collins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: • To present a summary of the collected data on urological litigation within the UK National Health Service (NHS). • Knowledge of the main areas of litigation is essential for maintaining good clinical practice as well as risk management procedures in any specialty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • Details of all claims closed with indemnity payment pertaining to the specialty of urology as practiced by urologists, general surgeons and paediatric surgeons was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) for the years since its creation in 1995 to 2009. • The data was then classified and analysed.
RESULTS: • In all, 493 cases were closed with indemnity payment with a total of £20,508,686.18 paid. The average payment per claim was £41,599.77. • Most of the claims were related to non-operative events (232), followed by postoperative events (168) and intraoperative events (92). • The most common reason for non-operative-related claims was failure to diagnose/treat cancer (69), perforation/organ injury (38) was the highest intraoperative-related claim and a forgotten ureteric stent (23) was the most frequent postoperative-related claim. • The five most commonly implicated procedures were ureteroscopy/ureteric stenting (45), transurethral resection of the prostate (30), nephrectomy (26), vasectomy (19) and urethral catheterisation (15).
CONCLUSIONS: • The present study once again emphasizes the importance of thorough clinical assessment, record keeping and follow-up as well as informed consent and good communication with patients. • Recognising the areas of highest risk and improving practice should limit future claims.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481130     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

1.  Does the source of referral affect outcomes for paediatric testicular torsion?

Authors:  R Peeraully; M Jancauskaite; S Dawes; S Green; N Fraser
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Does true Gleason pattern 3 merit its cancer descriptor?

Authors:  Saiful Miah; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Management of Paediatric Testicular Torsion - Are we adhering to Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) recommendations.

Authors:  H S Thakkar; I Yardley; D Kufeji
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Contemporary review of testicular torsion: new concepts, emerging technologies and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Daniel G DaJusta; Candace F Granberg; Carlos Villanueva; Linda A Baker
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Testicular torsion treatment: the horns of a dilemma?

Authors:  S Lewis; L Hopkins; T Evans; W Lewis; R Harries
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A new patient safety smartphone application for prevention of "forgotten" ureteral stents: results from a clinical pilot study in 194 patients.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Rodrigo Pessoa; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; McCabe C Kenny; Diedra Gustafson; Leticia Nogueira; Mark E Leo; Michael K Yu; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-04

7.  Stent cards: a simple solution for forgotten stents?

Authors:  Masood Moghul; Stefanos Almpanis
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-05-29

8.  Encrusted Ureteral Stent in a Spanish Speaking Female: A Case of a Forgotten Stent Lost in Translation.

Authors:  Gagandeep S Gill; Tej J Desai; Shing-Yu Lin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-12

9.  Eleven-year descriptive analysis of closed court verdicts on medical errors in Spain and Massachusetts.

Authors:  Priscila Giraldo; Luke Sato; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Mercè Comas; Kathy Dwyer; Maria Sala; Xavier Castells
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Analysis of closed medical litigation in urology.

Authors:  Su Hwan Shin; So Yoon Kim; Seung Gyeong Jang; Won Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.