Literature DB >> 31754844

Lowering Targeted Atherogenic Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals for Patients at "Extreme" ASCVD Risk.

Paul D Rosenblit1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review randomized interventional clinical and imaging trials that support lower targeted atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol goals in "extreme" and "very high" atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk settings. Major atherosclerotic cardiovascular event (MACE) prevention among the highest risk patients with ASCVD requires aggressive management of global risks, including lowering of the fundamental atherogenic apolipoprotein B-associated lipoprotein cholesterol particles [i.e., triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnant cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and lipoprotein(a)]. LDL-C has been the long-time focus of imaging studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The 2004 adult treatment panel (ATP-III) update recognized that the long-standing targeted LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL potentially fostered substantial undertreatment of the very highest coronary heart disease (CHD) risk individuals and was lowered to < 70 mg/dL as an "optional" goal for "very high" 10-year CHD [CHD death + myocardial infarction (MI)] risk exceeding 20%. This evidence-based guideline change was supported by the observed benefits demonstrated in the high-risk primary and secondary prevention populations in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population in the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 trial (PROVE-IT), and the secondary prevention population in the Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) study. Subsequent national and international guidelines maintained a targeted LDL-C goal < 70 mg/dL, or a threshold for management of > 70 mg/dL for patients with CHD, CHD risk equivalency, or ASCVD. RECENT
FINDINGS: Subgroup or meta-analyses of several RCTs, IVUS imaging studies, and the ACS population in IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) supported the evidence-based 2017 American Association Clinical Endocrinologist (AACE) guideline change establishing a targeted LDL-C goal < 55 mg/dL, non-HDL-C < 80 mg/dl, and apolipoprotein B (apo B) < 70 mg/dL for patients at "Extreme" ASCVD risk, i.e., 10-year 3-point-MACE-composite (CV death, non-fatal MI, or ischemic stroke) risk exceeding 30%. Moreover, with no recognized lower-limit-associated intolerance or safety issues, even more intensive lowering of atherogenic cholesterol levels is supported by the following evidence base: (1) analysis of eight high-intensity statin-based prospective secondary prevention IVUS atheroma volume regression trials; (2) a distribution analysis of on-treatment, ezetimibe and background-statin, of the very low LDL-C levels reached and CVD event risk in the IMPROVE-IT ACS population; (3) the secondary prevention Global Assessment of Pl\aque Regression With a PCSK9 Antibody as Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound (GLAGOV) on background-statin; and (4) the secondary prevention population of Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER). By example, in FOURIER, the population on background-statin at a baseline median 92 mg/dL achieved median LDL-C level of 30 mg/dL and non-HDL-C to < 65 mg/dl, and apo B to < 50 mg/dL, and subgroup and post hoc analyses all demonstrated additional ASCVD event reduction benefits as LDL-C was further reduced. The level of ASCVD risk determines the degree, urgency, and persistence in global risk management, including fundamental atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol particle lowering. "Extreme" risk patients may require extremely low targeted LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apo B goals; such efforts, implied by more recent interventional trials and analyses, are aimed at maximal atheroma plaque regression, stabilization, and MACE event reduction with the aspiration of improved quality lifespan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-point-MACE-composite (CV death, non-fatal MI or ischemic stroke) risk; ASCVD risk assessment; Atherogenic lipoprotein cholesterol particle-lowering; Extreme risk; LDL-C-lowering, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B; Secondary prevention; Very high risk

Year:  2019        PMID: 31754844     DOI: 10.1007/s11892-019-1246-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diab Rep        ISSN: 1534-4827            Impact factor:   4.810


  94 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal.

Authors:  James H O'Keefe; Loren Cordain; William H Harris; Richard M Moe; Robert Vogel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk: consensus conference report from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors:  John D Brunzell; Michael Davidson; Curt D Furberg; Ronald B Goldberg; Barbara V Howard; James H Stein; Joseph L Witztum
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Benefit of Adding Ezetimibe to Statin Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Safety in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus: Results From IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial).

Authors:  Robert P Giugliano; Christopher P Cannon; Michael A Blazing; José C Nicolau; Ramón Corbalán; Jindřich Špinar; Jeong-Gun Park; Jennifer A White; Erin A Bohula; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy.

Authors:  Stephen D Wiviott; Christopher P Cannon; David A Morrow; Kausik K Ray; Marc A Pfeffer; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial.

Authors:  F M Sacks; P Alaupovic; L A Moye; T G Cole; B Sussex; M J Stampfer; M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Marc S Sabatine; Robert P Giugliano; Stephen D Wiviott; Frederick J Raal; Dirk J Blom; Jennifer Robinson; Christie M Ballantyne; Ransi Somaratne; Jason Legg; Scott M Wasserman; Robert Scott; Michael J Koren; Evan A Stein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; C Noel Bairey Merz; H Bryan Brewer; Luther T Clark; Donald B Hunninghake; Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2013 consensus statement--executive summary.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Martin J Abrahamson; Joshua I Barzilay; Lawrence Blonde; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Michael A Bush; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Michael B Davidson; Daniel Einhorn; W Timothy Garvey; George Grunberger; Yehuda Handelsman; Irl B Hirsch; Paul S Jellinger; Janet B McGill; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Paul D Rosenblit; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Michael H Davidson
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.443

View more
  1 in total

1.  ALERT-LDL: adherence to guidelines in the treatment of patients with dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Giorgio Bosso; Mariarosaria De Luca; Giovanni Alma; Vincenzo Carbone; Ferdinando Ferrara; Biagio Fimiani; Franco Guarnaccia; Alessandro Iandolo; Sabato Murolo; Maurizio Olivares; Emanuele Romeo; Giosuè Santoro; Antonio Valvano; Giovanni Zito; Ugo Oliviero
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.397

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.