Literature DB >> 16226163

Can low-density lipoprotein be too low? The safety and efficacy of achieving very low low-density lipoprotein with intensive statin therapy: a PROVE IT-TIMI 22 substudy.

Stephen D Wiviott1, Christopher P Cannon, David A Morrow, Kausik K Ray, Marc A Pfeffer, Eugene Braunwald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of achieving very low calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels with intensive statin therapy.
BACKGROUND: Intensive statin therapy reduces clinical events occurring after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may result in LDL levels markedly lower than guideline levels. Prior epidemiologic and preclinical studies raise concerns about the safety of very low cholesterol levels.
METHODS: The Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) study compared intensive therapy (atorvastatin, 80 mg) and moderate therapy (pravastatin, 40 mg) in patients after ACS. Patients treated with atorvastatin were divided by four-month LDL values into groups: >100, >80 to 100 (reference-range-meeting guidelines), >60 to 80, >40 to 60, and <40 mg/dl. Baseline, clinical, and safety data were compared among groups achieving guideline recommendation levels or lower.
RESULTS: Among 1,825 patients with four-month LDL, 91% were at goal (<100 mg/dl). The distribution was >80 to 100 mg/dl (14%), >60 to 80 mg/dl (31%), >40 to 60 mg/dl (34%), and <40 mg/dl (11%). Those with lower LDL levels were more often male, older, and diabetic, and had lower baseline LDL levels. They had prior statin therapy and fewer prior myocardial infarctions (MI). There were no significant differences in safety parameters, including muscle, liver, or retinal abnormalities, intracranial hemorrhage, or death, in the very low LDL groups. The <40 mg/dl and 40 to 60 mg/dl groups had fewer major cardiac events (death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia, revascularization).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients treated with an accepted LDL goal (80 to 100 mg/dl), there was no adverse effect on safety with lower achieved LDL levels, and apparent improved clinical efficacy. These data identify no intrinsic safety concern of achieving low LDL and, therefore, a strategy of intensive treatment need not be altered in patients achieving very low LDL levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226163     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  70 in total

1.  Selective release of newly synthesised and newly captured GABA from synaptosomes by potassium depolarisation.

Authors:  L D Ryan; R Roskoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Myo-Myo: Yes, papa. Eating sugar? No, papa! Modulating the myocardial menu for imaging coronary inflammation...

Authors:  Jagat Narula; H William Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement--recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ruth McPherson; Jiri Frohlich; George Fodor; Jacques Genest
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  The effect of intensive lipid lowering on coronary atheroma and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Emma S Houslay; Jaydeep Sarma; Neal G Uren
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Optimal low-density lipoprotein levels: evidence from epidemiology and clinical trials.

Authors:  Josh Todd; John A Farmer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in asymptomatic diabetic patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Ajay Yerramasu; Shreenidhi Venuraju Maggae; Avijit Lahiri; Dhakshinamurthy Vijay Anand
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Recommendations for management of dyslipidemia in high cardiovascular risk patients.

Authors:  Manoela B Braga; Anatoly Langer; Lawrence A Leiter
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Problems and possible solutions for therapy with statins.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Is There an Ideal Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level? Confusion regarding Lipid Guidelines, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets, and Medical Management.

Authors:  Thomas F Whayne
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-12-12

Review 10.  Targeting LDL Cholesterol: Beyond Absolute Goals Toward Personalized Risk.

Authors:  Morton Leibowitz; Chandra Cohen-Stavi; Sanjay Basu; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.