| Literature DB >> 31754813 |
Szu-Yu Chen1, Ming-Hsin Lai2, Chih-Wei Tung3, Dong-Hong Wu2, Fang-Yu Chang4, Tsung-Chun Lin5, Chia-Lin Chung6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice bakanae disease has emerged as a new threat to rice production. In recent years, an increase in the occurrence and severity of bakanae disease has been reported in several areas in Asia. Although bakanae disease affects rice yield and quality, little is known about the genetics of bakanae resistance in rice. The lack of large-scale screens for bakanae resistance in rice germplasm has also limited the development and deployment of resistant varieties.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium fujikuroi; Genome-wide association mapping; Rice diversity panel 1
Year: 2019 PMID: 31754813 PMCID: PMC6872702 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-019-0337-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Bakanae resistance QTLs mapped from previous studies
| QTL | Chr. | QTL region (Mb)a | PVE (%)b | Mapping population | Trait | Publication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.62–1.04 | – | 0–4 disease scale | Volante et al. | ||
| 1 | 3.10–3.36* | 24.74 | F14 RILs | mortality rate | Fiyaz et al. | |
| 1 | 4.65–8.41* | 6.49 | F14 RILs | mortality rate | Fiyaz et al. | |
| 1 | 13.54–15.13 | 20.20 | F2:4 RILs | proportion of healthy plants | Lee et al. | |
| 1 | 22.56–24.10 | – | F2 and F3 | mortality rate | Ji et al. | |
| 1 | 23.21–23.72 | 65 | BC6F4 | proportion of healthy plants | Hur et al. | |
| 1 | 23.64–23.67 | – | BC7F4 | proportion of healthy plants | Lee et al. | |
| 1 | 23.32–23.34* | 4.76 | F14 RILs | mortality rate | Fiyaz et al. | |
| 1 | 34.10–34.95* | 13.40 | Double haploid | Difference in seedling length | Yang et al. 2006 | |
| 3 | 21.43–21.78 | 9.10 | F14 RILs | mortality rate | Fiyaz et al. | |
| 4 | 31.16–31.75 | – | 0–4 disease scale | Volante et al. | ||
| 10 | 18.72–19.23* | 13.30 | Double haploid | Difference in seedling length | Yang et al. 2006 |
aThe genomic position is based on the MSU7 Nipponbare reference genome
bPhenotypic variation explained
*QTL region was estimated using the physical positions of the markers
Fig. 1Distribution of bakanae disease resistance scores. The histograms show the distribution of resistance scores in the all population, and boxplots show the phenotypic distributions of the all population and the two subgroups. (a and b) Disease severity index; (c and d) Colonization rate
Fig. 2Correlation between disease severity index and colonization rate. r: Pearson correlation coefficient
Fig. 3Genome-wide association mapping in the Rice Diversity Panel 1. Loci significantly associated with bakanae resistance were identified for (a) disease severity index in the all population, (b) disease severity index in the indica subgroup, and (c) colonization rate in the all population. Manhattan plots on the left show significant genomic regions identified for disease severity index (a and b) and colonization rate (c). X axis: rice chromosomes; Y axis: -Log10(P). Q-Q plots on the right show the fitness of the selected models used for different traits in the all population or subgroups. X axis: expected –Log10(P); Y axis: observed –Log10(P)
Candidate QTLs associated with resistance to bakanae disease
| QTL | Population | Trait | Chr | QTL region (bp)a | Genes within region | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severity index | 1 | 401,383-426,527 | 5 | 0.27 | ||
| All | Severity index | 1 | 2,254,725-2,329,243 | 10 | 0.18 | |
| All | Colonization rate | 1 | 22,088,636-22,248,843 | 12 | 0.28 | |
| Severity index | 1 | 23,631,992-23,640,231 | 3 | 0.25 | ||
| All | Colonization rate | 3 | 27,480,288-27,635,650 | 12 | 0.19 | |
| All | Severity index | 3 | 27,480,288-27,635,650 | 12 | 0.22 | |
| All | Colonization rate | 4 | 22,371,038-22,428,157 | 14 | 0.33 | |
| All | Severity index | 6 | 3,276,254-3,639,339 | 49 | 0.22 | |
| All | Colonization rate | 6 | 4,866,345-5,059,806 | 29 | 0.28 | |
| Severity index | 6 | 25,298,288-25,638,876 | 19 | 0.20 | ||
| All | Severity index | 8 | 6,142,736-6,239,144 | 15 | 0.28 | |
| Severity index | 10 | 5,678,051-6,024,705 | 20 | 0.25 | ||
| All | Severity index | 10 | 6,849,663-6,864,693 | 1 | 0.21 | |
| Severity index | 10 | 9,090,969-9,337,961 | 16 | 0.26 | ||
| All | Severity index | 11 | 22,576,995-22,582,906 | 1 | 0.13 |
aThe genomic position is based on the MSU7 Nipponbare reference genome
bR2 represents the phenotypic variation explained by the most significant SNP in the QTL
Fig. 4Linkage mapping in the IR64 x Nipponbare population. (a) QTLs detected by composite interval mapping. The horizontal lines represent the logarithm of odds (LOD) thresholds at 90% (purple), 95% (blue), and 99% (red) confidence levels based on 1000 permutations; (b) Genetic map of 7466 bin markers; (c) Frequency distribution of the disease severity index in the 132 recombinant inbred lines
Fig. 5The location and sequence analysis of qBK1.7. (a) The positions of qBK1.7 and previously identified QTLs. (b) Manhattan plots showing the results from genome-wide association study (GWAS) and linkage mapping in this study. (c) Analysis of the association between bakanae resistance and qBK1.7 sequences across 11 accessions carrying the resistance haplotype and 9 accessions carrying the susceptibility haplotype. The pink, gray, and blue bars represent the predicted exons, introns, and untranslated regions, respectively, obtained from The Rice Annotation Project website