F Prayer1, S Röhrich1, J Pan2, J Hofmanninger2, G Langs2, H Prosch3. 1. Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. 2. Computational Imaging and Research Lab, Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich. 3. Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. helmut.prosch@meduniwien.ac.at.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and management in patients with lung disease through automated detection, quantification, classification, and prediction of disease progression. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Owing to unspecific symptoms, few well-defined CT disease patterns, and varying prognosis, interstitial lungs disease represents a focus of AI-based research. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Supervised and unsupervised machine learning can identify CT disease patterns using features which may allow the analysis of associations with specific diseases and outcomes. PERFORMANCE: Machine learning on the one hand improves computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules. On the other hand it enables further characterization of pulmonary nodules, which may improve resource effectiveness regarding lung cancer screening programs. ACHIEVEMENTS: There are several challenges regarding AI-based CT data analysis. Besides the need for powerful algorithms, expert annotations and extensive training data sets that reflect physiologic and pathologic variability are required for effective machine learning. Comparability and reproducibility of AI research deserve consideration due to a lack of standardization in this emerging field. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: This review article presents the state of the art and the challenges concerning AI in lung imaging with special consideration of interstitial lung disease, and detection and consideration of pulmonary nodules.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and management in patients with lung disease through automated detection, quantification, classification, and prediction of disease progression. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Owing to unspecific symptoms, few well-defined CT disease patterns, and varying prognosis, interstitial lungs disease represents a focus of AI-based research. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Supervised and unsupervised machine learning can identify CT disease patterns using features which may allow the analysis of associations with specific diseases and outcomes. PERFORMANCE: Machine learning on the one hand improves computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules. On the other hand it enables further characterization of pulmonary nodules, which may improve resource effectiveness regarding lung cancer screening programs. ACHIEVEMENTS: There are several challenges regarding AI-based CT data analysis. Besides the need for powerful algorithms, expert annotations and extensive training data sets that reflect physiologic and pathologic variability are required for effective machine learning. Comparability and reproducibility of AI research deserve consideration due to a lack of standardization in this emerging field. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: This review article presents the state of the art and the challenges concerning AI in lung imaging with special consideration of interstitial lung disease, and detection and consideration of pulmonary nodules.
Authors: Mingchen Gao; Ulas Bagci; Le Lu; Aaron Wu; Mario Buty; Hoo-Chang Shin; Holger Roth; Georgios Z Papadakis; Adrien Depeursinge; Ronald M Summers; Ziyue Xu; Daniel J Mollura Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis Date: 2016-06-06
Authors: Ahmed Hosny; Chintan Parmar; John Quackenbush; Lawrence H Schwartz; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Samuel Y Ash; Rola Harmouche; Diego Lassala Lopez Vallejo; Julian A Villalba; Kris Ostridge; River Gunville; Carolyn E Come; Jorge Onieva Onieva; James C Ross; Gary M Hunninghake; Souheil Y El-Chemaly; Tracy J Doyle; Pietro Nardelli; Gonzalo V Sanchez-Ferrero; Hilary J Goldberg; Ivan O Rosas; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko Journal: Respir Res Date: 2017-03-07
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Patrick Grossmann; Yongqiang Tan; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Naiyer Rizvi; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Grace Hyun J Kim; Stephan S Weigt; John A Belperio; Matthew S Brown; Yu Shi; Joshua H Lai; Jonathan G Goldin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 5.315