ZhongTao Yin1, Fan Zhang1, Jacqueline Smith2, Richard Kuo2, Zhuo-Cheng Hou3. 1. Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. 2. The Roslin Institute & R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK. 3. Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. zchou@cau.edu.cn.
Abstract
Duck (Anas platyrhynchos), one of the most economically important waterfowl, is an ideal model for studying the immune protection mechanism of birds. An incomplete duck reference genome and very limited availability of full-length cDNAs has hindered the identification of alternatively spliced transcripts and slowed down many basic studies in ducks. We applied PacBio Iso-Seq technologies to multiple tissues from duck for use in transcriptome sequencing. We obtained 199,993 full-length transcripts and comprehensively annotated these transcripts. 23,755 lncRNAs were predicted from all identified transcripts and 35,031 alternative splicing events, which divided into 5 models, were accurately predicted from 3,346 genes. Our data constitute a large increase in the known number of both lncRNA, and alternatively spliced transcripts of duck and plays an important role in improving current genome annotation. In addition, the data will be extremely useful for functional studies in other birds.
Duck (Anas platyrhynchos), one of the most economically important waterfowl, is an ideal model for studying the immune protection mechanism of birds. An incomplete duck reference genome and very limited availability of full-length cDNAs has hindered the identification of alternatively spliced transcripts and slowed down many basic studies in ducks. We applied PacBio Iso-Seq technologies to multiple tissues from duck for use in transcriptome sequencing. We obtained 199,993 full-length transcripts and comprehensively annotated these transcripts. 23,755 lncRNAs were predicted from all identified transcripts and 35,031 alternative splicing events, which divided into 5 models, were accurately predicted from 3,346 genes. Our data constitute a large increase in the known number of both lncRNA, and alternatively spliced transcripts of duck and plays an important role in improving current genome annotation. In addition, the data will be extremely useful for functional studies in other birds.
Duck (), one of the most economically important waterfowl, is an ideal model for studying the protection offered by the immune system in birds. Insights have been obtained using various transcriptomic datasets from multiple tissues, developmental times and environmental backgrounds[1-4]. The duck genome reference assembly, released in 2013, used the duck genetic map and the comparative physical map with the aim of completely covering the gene space[5]. The high-quality genome annotations which relied on evidence-based approaches required various transcriptomic datasets. Although short-read sequencing data of duck have accumulated over recent years, full-length (FL) RNAseq datasets are not currently available in domestic ducks, limiting genome annotation and the ability for identifying alternatively spliced genes. In addition, low-quality transcripts assembled from short-read sequencing will reduce the accuracy of annotations[6].Alternative splicing (AS) is prevalent in most eukaryotic genomes, and is a mechanism by which an organism can increase its repertoire of proteins and regulate physiological and developmental processes/pathways[7-11]. The diversity and complexity of AS increase the difficulties faced in genetic research. Studies of AS in duck are scarce, and likewise, there is a lack of such information in most birds due to the absence of detailed full-length cDNA data and high-quality genome annotation[12]. The method of Sanger sequencing of full-length cDNA clones has provided a reliable standard for genome annotation projects[13-15]. Recently, this method has been replaced by cheaper short-read technologies. However, the short-reads make it difficult to define the actual combinations of splice-site, increasing false positive AS prediction. The PacBio single-molecule technology can obtain actual sequences for transcript isoforms of each gene without assembly[16-18]. This technology provides more evidence for AS and improves the accuracy of genome annotation[19-21].There are few studies of AS in ducks (or other birds)[22]. To begin to address this, we carried out PacBio long-read transcriptome sequencing on multiple tissues from duck. We multiplexed eight tissues to ensure coverage of transcript isoforms and pooled them for subsequent sequencing. We obtained a total of 199,993 full-length transcripts ranging in size from 206 bp to 15,233 bp. The number of transcript sequences annotated to NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (Nr), NCBI nucleotide sequences (Nt) and the UniprotKB database is 127,780, 185,435 and 102,539, respectively. Furthermore, there are 116,503, 82,456 and 97,823 transcripts corresponding to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), euKaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG) and Gene Ontology (GO) databases for providing functional annotations, respectively. In addition, a total of 35,031 AS events were detected in the unigenes, while 23,755 lncRNAs were identified in multiple tissues. Our study provides the first comprehensive datasets describing AS events and lncRNA transcripts in Anas platyrhynchos, which will be useful for further AS evolution studies in birds. This data will also serve as an important dataset for genome annotation.
Method
Sample collection and RNA preparation
Duck samples (both adult and embryos) were obtained from Pekin Gold Duck Inc. We collected 8 tissues (pectoralis, heart, uterus, ovary, testis, hypothalamus, pituitary and 13 days-old embryo) in order to obtain comprehensive transcript information. Tissue samples were sampled immediately after euthanization, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. RNA from each tissue was extracted individually (10 μg per tissue) using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration was assessed using a NanoDropTM spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), and RNA integrity number (RIN) values were calculated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) (Table 1).
Table 1
The purity and completeness of RNA for Iso-seq library.
Sample
Library
Accession IDs
Purity
Completeness (RIN)
OD260/280
OD260/230
Pectoralis
Library1
SRX5511971
2.15
1.88
7.9
Hypothalamus
1.83
1.61
8.5
Hypophysis
1.98
1.83
8.2
Uterus
2.04
2.14
8.8
Ovary
Library2
SRX5511972
1.89
1.71
9.2
Testis
2.02
2.13
9.5
Heart
2.02
2.1
8.3
Embryo
2.02
2.2
8.4
The purity and completeness of RNA for Iso-seq library.
Library construction
We built two iso-seq libraries from 8 tissues, in which pectoralis, uterus, hypothalamus, and pituitary were pooled to make one library, and heart, ovary, testis, and embryo were pooled for the other. Equal amounts of RNA from each tissue were mixed (5 μg per tissue) to construct the iso-seq libraries. Sequencing libraries were generated according to PacBio’s iso-seq sequencing protocol. Briefly, the Clontech SMARTER cDNA synthesis kit with Oligo-dT primers was used to generate first- and second-strand cDNA from polyA mRNA. Size fractionation and selection (<4 kb and >4 kb) were performed using the BluePippin™ Size Selection System (Sage Science, Beverly, MA). Two SMRT bell libraries were constructed with the Pacific Biosciences DNA Template Prep Kit 2.0 and SMRT sequencing was then performed using the Pacific Bioscience Sequel System.
Full-length sequencing and analysis pipeline
We combined all raw data and performed initial data processing according to the Iso-seq standard pipeline (Fig. 1). The Circular consensus sequence (CCS) was generated from initial data using the SMRTlink (version 5.1) software[16]. The CCS was classified into full-length and non-full length reads according to the 5′and 3′adapters and the poly(A) tail. Reads containing both the 5′ and 3′ primers and having a poly(A) tail signal preceding the 3′ primer were considered to be full-length reads. Iterative Clustering for Error Correction (ICE) was used to find transcript clusters based on the pairwise alignment and reiterative assignment of full-length reads. The cluster consensus reads were polished with non-full length reads to obtain high-quality isoforms using Arrow software(https://downloads.pacbcloud.com/public/software/installers/smrtlink_5.0.1.9585.zip). The RNA-Seq data from 16 tissues of duck[23] generated by our lab was used to correct nucleotide mismatches in consensus reads with the software LoRDEC[24]. Any redundancy in corrected consensus reads was removed by CD-Hit-Est[25] to obtain final transcripts for the subsequent analysis. To estimate the completeness of our multiple tissue transcriptomic sequencing, we used a benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs (BUSCO) assessment[26]. We used ortholog sets from Aves lineages to examine transcriptome completion. We analyzed the completeness of datasets in processing steps, both corrected, polished consensus data and non-redundant transcript data.
Fig. 1
The standard Iso-Seq pipeline for raw data processing. Raw sequence reads from a Pacbio RSII sequencer were processed using SMRTlink. The full-length reads and non-full-length reads were clustered into consensus transcripts using Arrow. All polished reads were corrected with Illumina short-read data using LoRDEC. All sequence data that removed redundant sequences using CD-Hit-Est were carried on to further analysis.
The standard Iso-Seq pipeline for raw data processing. Raw sequence reads from a Pacbio RSII sequencer were processed using SMRTlink. The full-length reads and non-full-length reads were clustered into consensus transcripts using Arrow. All polished reads were corrected with Illumina short-read data using LoRDEC. All sequence data that removed redundant sequences using CD-Hit-Est were carried on to further analysis.
Functional annotation of PacBio isoforms
The obtained full-length transcripts were annotated by conducting a local BLASTx[27] search against the protein databases, namely the Nr protein database at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), UniProtKB (http://www.expasy.ch/sprot, version:2019-8-14) and KOG. We determined the best match between each transcript and a known sequence based on the bit score. The results with a bit score below 50 were discarded and the highest bit score was considered as the best match. To classify the functions of transcripts based on molecular function, biological process and cellular component features, GO annotation was performed using Metascape[28], while KEGG orthology and pathway annotations were obtained by using KAAS (KEGG Automatic Annotation Server)[29]. ANGLE[30] was used to determine the open reading frame (ORF) of each full-length cDNA sequence. We used high confidence duck protein sequences (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-95/fasta/anas_platyrhynchos/cds/) for ANGLE training and then ran the ANGLE prediction for given sequences.In addition to protein-coding RNAs, long non-coding RNAs constitute a major component of the transcriptome. In order to improve the accuracy of prediction of lncRNA, we used CPC (Coding Potential Calculator)[31], PLEK (the predictor of long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs based on an improved k-mer scheme)[32], Pfam-scan[33] and CNCI (Coding-Non-Coding-Index)[34] to predict the coding potential of transcripts after CD-Hit-Est, respectively. First, PLEK and CNCI were used to predict the coding potential according to the sequence characteristics of transcripts. The sequence of transcripts was compared with the known protein database by BLAST using CPC and searched by homology with Pfam-A and Pfam-B databases, their coding potential being predicted more accurately after comparing with the databases. The transcripts found by all programs were considered candidate lncRNA. Then, candidate lncRNA whose ORF length was longer than 300 bp and also had meaningful blast homology (BLASTX) when searched against the bird protein databases, were then removed. We determined the remaining non protein-coding transcripts as high confidence lncRNAs.
Identification of AS modes
The full-length transcripts were mapped to the reference genome CAU_duck1.0 using GMAP[35]. The alignment file was filtered for 90% alignment coverage and 90% alignment identity and corresponding GFF files generated using cDNA_Cupcake[16]. SUPPA2[36] generates the AS and transcript events from an annotation file (GFF/GTF format). It then generates two files: ioe format for local AS events, and ioi format for transcripts. The ioe file provides for each AS event in a gene and the transcripts that describe either form of the event. The ioi file provides for each transcript in a gene, the set of all transcripts from that gene from which the transcript relative abundance is calculated. The AS event generated by SUPPA2 contained five different types: Alternative 5′/3′ splice-site (A5/A3), Skipping exon (SE), Alternative first/last Exons (AF/AL), Mutually exclusive exons (MX) and Retained intron (RI).
Data Records
The raw full-length data (Table 2) was deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP188279[37]. The short-read RNA-Seq data used for correction was deposited in the SRA under accession number SRX3963450[38], SRX3963443[39], SRX3963442[40], SRX3963441[41], SRX3963440[42], SRX3963439[43], SRX3963438[44], SRX3963437[45], SRX3963436[46], SRX3963435[47], SRX3963434[48], SRX3963433[49], SRX3963432[50], SRX3963431[51], SRX3963429[52], SRX3963428[53]. The full-length transcripts dataset generated from initial data were deposited in the NCBI Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly (TSA) database under accession number GHJL00000000.1[54]. The results of functional annotation and alternative splicing models were deposited in figshare[55]. The CAU_1.0 reference genome of duck was deposited in NCBI Assembly under accession number GCA_002743455.1[56].
Table 2
Read number and length distribution after ISO-Seq analysis.
Subreads
Number
Subreads number
14341324
Average subreads length(bp)
2903
N50(bp)
3259
Classify
CCS
702788
5′-primer
605897
3′-primer
653411
Poly-A
641180
Full length
563320
Flnc
559454
Average flnc read length(bp)
3338
Consensus reads
313565
Correct
Before_correction
After_correction
Total_number
313565
313565
Mean_length(bp)
3653
3698
Min_length(bp)
202
199
Max_length(bp)
15028
15233
N50(bp)
4017
4079
N90(bp)
2325
2341
Cluster
Number of transcripts
Number of Genes
<500 bp
311
169
500–1 kbp
985
541
1 k–2 kbp
29976
14409
2 k–3 kbp
92431
48198
>3 kbp
189862
136676
Total
313565
199993
Read number and length distribution after ISO-Seq analysis.
Technical Validation
Quality control of sequencing analysis
From 77 Gb raw data, we produced 41.62 Gb subreads, which was classified into 702,788 non-chimeric circular consensus (CCS) reads. CCS reads comprised 563,320 full-length reads with an average read length of 3,338 bp. The 313,565 high-quality consensus isoforms and low-quality consensus isoforms were corrected with RNA-Seq data using LoRDEC. 199,993 corrected full-length isoforms were used for further analysis after accounting for redundancy (Table 2). We used Aves lineages (ortholog sets) to examine transcript completion (Table 3). As expected, the percentage of complete BUSCO genes is over 80% in full-length transcripts, both before and after removing redundancy. After the redundant sequences were removed, the complete duplicated sequence decreased by 12.4% and the number of complete single copy genes increased by 10.4%, indicating that the integrity of the full-length transcripts was not compromised by removal of the redundant sequences. Significantly reduced, non-redundant full-length transcript data sets showed high integrity for subsequent analysis.
Table 3
BUSCO analysis of transcript completeness.
BUSCO results
FL_after corrected
FL_NR
Complete BUSCOs
4064
82.7%
3966
80.7%
Complete single-copy BUSCOs
1145
23.3%
1656
33.7%
Complete Duplicated BUSCOs
2919
59.4%
2310
47.00%
Fragmented BUSCOs
251
5.10%
320
6.50%
Missing BUSCOs
600
12.2%
629
12.80%
Total BUSCO groups searched
4915
100%
4915
100%
*FL: full-length.
BUSCO analysis of transcript completeness.*FL: full-length.
Annotation quality control
We annotated full-length transcripts with multiple reference databases for further study of gene function. First, the majority of transcripts (185,435; 92.72%) have similar sequences in Nt. Matches to other databases were as follows: 127,780 (63.89%) to Nr, 102,539 (51.27%) to UniProtKB and 53,570 (26.79%) transcripts aligned to the pfam database using BLASTx.All transcripts were subject to functional annotation and classification. About half of the full-length transcripts were annotated by KEGG, GO and KOG databases. In general, 187,139 (93.57%) transcripts were found in at least one database and 20.81% of the transcripts were found in all databases (Table 4). The metascape website first obtained GO annotations from Gene Ontology (http://geneontology.org/, 2019-07-01)[57]. GO terms were assigned to each isoform based on the corresponding homologs in UniProtKB database. A total of 97,823 (48.91%) transcripts were annotated to multiple GO classification terms. In the “biological process” category, the majority of the transcripts were represented by ‘cellular process’ (63,996), ‘biological regulation’ (55,142) and ‘single-organism process’ (54,805) terms. On the other hand, ‘cell’ (86,603) was the most represented item in the “cellular component” category, while ‘binding’ (62,070) was the most common term in the “molecular function” category (Fig. 2). Further analysis of the KEGG annotations revealed that most transcripts were enriched in signal transduction (13,791), endocrine system (6,935), immune system (5,791), cellular community-eukaryotes (5,744) and transport and catabolism (5,645). With KOG analysis, 82,456 (41.23%) transcripts were annotated and classified into 26 KOG categories. The largest cluster was “Signal transduction mechanisms (T)”, indicating that most of the function represented by these transcripts are for the basic mechanisms controlling cell growth, proliferation, metabolism, and many other processes. The next largest cluster was ‘the general function prediction only (R)’, followed by ‘Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (O)’, ‘Cytoskeleton (Z)’ and ‘Transcription (K)’.
Table 4
Annotation statistics.
Database
Full-length transcripts of Duck
UniProtKB
102539 (51.27%)
Nr
127780 (63.89%)
Nt
185435 (92.72%)
KOG
82456 (41.23%)
GO
97823 (48.91%)
KEGG
116503 (58.25%)
Pfam
53570 (26.79%)
At least one database
187139 (93.57%)
All database
41614 (20.81%)
Fig. 2
GO functional annotations of the Duck (Anas platyrhynchos) full-length transcripts. All GO annotations were classified into three categories according to ‘cellular components’, ‘biological processes’, and ‘molecular functions’. The X-axis shows gene functions. The number of transcripts with GO functions is indicated on the Y-axis.
Annotation statistics.GO functional annotations of the Duck (Anas platyrhynchos) full-length transcripts. All GO annotations were classified into three categories according to ‘cellular components’, ‘biological processes’, and ‘molecular functions’. The X-axis shows gene functions. The number of transcripts with GO functions is indicated on the Y-axis.We obtained 34,364 candidate lncRNAs determined by the coding ability of the predicted sequence. In order to improve the accuracy of predicted lncRNA, sequences with ORF > 300 bp and which aligned against the avian protein databases were excluded, leaving 23,755 remaining sequences. The average gene expression of predicted lncRNAs is much lower than that of protein-coding RNAs (Fig. 3). In addition, the number of exons in lncRNAs is also significantly less than that of protein-coding RNAs. 71.72% of the predicted lncRNAs have only a single exon and only 11.36% of lncRNAs have more than two exons (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Characterization of identified novel lncRNAs. (a) Comparison of isoform expression between lncRNA and protein-coding RNA data. (b) The Number of exons in lncRNAs and protein-coding RNAs. In general, the number of exons in protein-coding RNAs is higher than in lncRNAs. More than 70% of the lncRNAs are represented by single-exon transcripts.
Characterization of identified novel lncRNAs. (a) Comparison of isoform expression between lncRNA and protein-coding RNA data. (b) The Number of exons in lncRNAs and protein-coding RNAs. In general, the number of exons in protein-coding RNAs is higher than in lncRNAs. More than 70% of the lncRNAs are represented by single-exon transcripts.
Quality control of AS events
More than 99% of full-length transcripts were mapped to the reference genome, and 18,328 gene models predicted (Table 5). We identified 35,031 AS events from 3,346 gene models. RI predominated, accounting for 61.86% of alternative transcripts. Except for AL (9.62%) and MX (8.13%), other AS types, such as RI (61.86%), SE (53.44%), A3 (50.30%), A5 (44.98%) and AF (29.63%), are more common in alternative splicing events (Fig. 4). Most genes exhibited only one model of AS, with only 70 genes showing every AS type (Fig. 5). We found that the number of AS events within genes is correlated with the number of exons, indicating that the complexity and diversity of transcription is enhanced by AS as exons increase.
Table 5
Alignment statistics for full-length transcripts after correction with Illumina data.
Alignment results
All full-length transcripts
Percent (%)
Unaligned
1719
0.86%
Multi-mapped
10488
5.24%
Uniquely Mapped
187786
93.90%
qCoverage = 100%
61745
30.87%
qCoverage > =99%:
53135
26.57%
qCoverage > =90%
34568
17.28%
Total number transcripts
199993
100.00%
Fig. 4
The total number of AS events in detected genes and transcripts by SUPPA2 analysis. A3, alternative 3′ splice site; SE, skipped exon; A5, alternative 5′ splice site; AF, alternative first exon; MX, mutually exclusive exon; AL, alternative last exon; RI, retained intron.
Fig. 5
Distribution of alternative splicing events in Genes. (a) Overlap of the different types of AS mechanisms; (b) The number of genes that identified different types of alternative splicing.
Alignment statistics for full-length transcripts after correction with Illumina data.The total number of AS events in detected genes and transcripts by SUPPA2 analysis. A3, alternative 3′ splice site; SE, skipped exon; A5, alternative 5′ splice site; AF, alternative first exon; MX, mutually exclusive exon; AL, alternative last exon; RI, retained intron.Distribution of alternative splicing events in Genes. (a) Overlap of the different types of AS mechanisms; (b) The number of genes that identified different types of alternative splicing.The data provided in this study form the first report of a full-length transcriptomic resource for ducks, which includes predicted lncRNA and AS events identified by Iso-seq technology. These findings will be invaluable for improving genome annotation, examining AS evolution, and conducting functional studies in ducks.
Authors: Robert D Finn; Penelope Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Sean R Eddy; Jaina Mistry; Alex L Mitchell; Simon C Potter; Marco Punta; Matloob Qureshi; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Gustavo A Salazar; John Tate; Alex Bateman Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ralf C Mueller; Patrik Ellström; Kerstin Howe; Marcela Uliano-Silva; Richard I Kuo; Katarzyna Miedzinska; Amanda Warr; Olivier Fedrigo; Bettina Haase; Jacquelyn Mountcastle; William Chow; James Torrance; Jonathan M D Wood; Josef D Järhult; Mahmoud M Naguib; Björn Olsen; Erich D Jarvis; Jacqueline Smith; Lél Eöry; Robert H S Kraus Journal: Gigascience Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 6.524