| Literature DB >> 31752961 |
Yong Wei1, Jiatian Wang1, Zhangyao Song1, Yulan He1, Zihao Zheng1, Peiyang Fan1, Dizi Yang1, Guofa Zhou2, Daibin Zhong2, Xueli Zheng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, is one of the 100 worst invasive species in the world and the vector for several arboviruses including dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses. Understanding the population spatial genetic structure, migration, and gene flow of vector species is critical to effectively preventing and controlling vector-borne diseases. Little is known about the population structure and genetic differentiation of native Ae. albopictus in China. The aim of this study was to examine the patterns of the spatial genetic structures of native Ae. albopictus populations, and their relationship to dengue incidence, on a large geographical scale.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes albopictus; Dengue; Gene flow; Genetic diversity; Microsatellite; Population structure
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31752961 PMCID: PMC6873696 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3801-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Geographical locations of Ae. albopictus sampling sites in China. Abbreviations: LS, Lingshui; QZ, Qiongzhong; BS, Baisha; CM, Chengmai; ZJ, Zhanjiang; MM, Maoming; SZ, Shenzhen; GZ, Guangzhou; JY, Jieyang; MZ, Meizhou; JH, Jinghong; WZ, Wuzhou; RJ, Rongjiang; GY, Guiyang; CQ, Chongqing; TN, Tongnan; MS, Meishan; CS, Changsha; GAZ, Ganzhou; NC, Nanchang; WH, Wuhan; JZ, Jingzhou; AK, Ankang; LX, Lanxi; SX, Shaoxing; HZ, Hangzhou; ZMD, Zhumadian; KF, Kaifeng; LY, Linyi; LF, Linfen; SJZ, Shijiazhuang; TJ, Tianjin; BJ, Beijing; SY, Shenyang
Sampling information of Ae. albopictus collection in China
| Province | Sample sites | Abbreviation | Sample size | Latitude | Longitude | Collection date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hainan | Lingshui | LS | 32 | 18°30ʹ27″N | 110°01ʹ59″E | August 2016 |
| Qiongzhong | QZ | 32 | 19°02ʹ06″N | 109°50ʹ03″E | August 2016 | |
| Baisha | BS | 22 | 19°13ʹ37″N | 109°26ʹ51″E | August 2016 | |
| Chengmai | CM | 32 | 19°44ʹ25″N | 110°00ʹ02″E | September 2016 | |
| Guangdong | Zhanjiang | ZJ | 32 | 21°05ʹ37″N | 109°42ʹ60″E | September 2018 |
| Maoming | MM | 28 | 21°31ʹ55″N | 111°0ʹ31″E | August 2018 | |
| Shenzhen | SZ | 32 | 22°32ʹ26″N | 113°59ʹ56″E | September 2018 | |
| Guangzhou | GZ | 32 | 23°11ʹ15″N | 113°19ʹ42″E | June 2018 | |
| Jieyang | JY | 32 | 23°37ʹ43″N | 116°16ʹ43″E | August 2018 | |
| Meizhou | MZ | 32 | 24°08ʹ11″N | 115°40ʹ26″E | August 2018 | |
| Yunnan | Jinghong | JH | 25 | 22°0ʹ32″N | 100°48ʹ0″E | April 2018 |
| Guangxi | Wuzhou | WZ | 33 | 23°22ʹ51″N | 110°54ʹ58″E | October 2018 |
| Guizhou | Rongjiang | RJ | 32 | 25°56ʹ31″N | 108°31ʹ40″E | August 2018 |
| Guiyang | GY | 31 | 26°33ʹ24″N | 106°45ʹ36″E | August 2018 | |
| Chongqing | Chongqing | CQ | 32 | 29°30ʹ32″N | 106°28ʹ36″E | June 2018 |
| Tongnan | TN | 28 | 30°09ʹ59″N | 105°49ʹ54″E | June 2018 | |
| Sichuan | Meishan | MS | 32 | 30°11ʹ55″N | 103°52ʹ01″E | September 2018 |
| Hunan | Changsha | CS | 32 | 28°14ʹ25″N | 113°04ʹ15″E | July 2018 |
| Jiangxi | Ganzhou | GAZ | 32 | 25°52ʹ18″N | 115°01ʹ29″E | September 2018 |
| Nanchang | NC | 30 | 28°40ʹ54″N | 115°54ʹ27″E | July 2018 | |
| Hubei | Wuhan | WH | 31 | 30°30ʹ30″N | 114°22ʹ39″E | July 2018 |
| Jingzhou | JZ | 28 | 29°50ʹ11″N | 112°28ʹ15″E | July 2018 | |
| Shanxi (west) | Ankang | AK | 18 | 32°36ʹ21″N | 108°25ʹ57″E | September 2018 |
| Zhejiang | Lanxi | LX | 32 | 29°13ʹ16″N | 119°28ʹ35″E | October 2018 |
| Shaoxing | SX | 27 | 29°50ʹ51″N | 120°30ʹ04″E | August 2018 | |
| Hangzhou | HZ | 25 | 30°18ʹ42″N | 120°07ʹ09″E | August 2018 | |
| Henan | Zhumadian | ZMD | 32 | 32°58ʹ34″N | 114°0ʹ27″E | August 2018 |
| Kaifeng | KF | 32 | 34°47ʹ53″N | 114°18ʹ05″E | August 2018 | |
| Shandong | Linyi | LY | 31 | 35°20ʹ18″N | 118°09ʹ06″E | August 2018 |
| Shanxi (east) | Linfen | LF | 32 | 36°10ʹ34″N | 111°36ʹ01″E | September 2018 |
| Hebei | Shijiazhuang | SJZ | 32 | 37°54ʹ55″N | 114°27ʹ49″E | August 2018 |
| Tianjin | Tianjin | TJ | 32 | 39°06ʹ19″N | 117°10ʹ41″E | August 2018 |
| Beijing | Beijing | BJ | 30 | 39°51ʹ36″N | 116°11ʹ45″E | August 2018 |
| Liaoning | Shenyang | SY | 28 | 41°52ʹ28″N | 123°33ʹ36″E | August 2018 |
Genetic relatedness between samples in Ae. albopictus population
| Kinship | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Within populations | ||
| Half sibling | 559 | 0.107 |
| Full sibling | 68 | 0.013 |
| Total | 627 | 0.120 |
| Between populations | ||
| Half sibling | 5882 | 1.125 |
| Full sibling | 82 | 0.016 |
| Total | 5964 | 1.141 |
| Total pairwise comparisons | 522,753 | |
Abbreviation: n, number of comparisons
Genetic indices for genetic markers of Ae. albopictus from China
| Locus | No. of alleles | Estimated null allele frequency | PIC | SI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aealbmic9 | 8 | – | 0.642 | 1.309 | 0.775 | 0.672 |
| Aealbmic10 | 9 | 0.137 | 0.547 | 1.051 | 0.573 | 0.586 |
| Aealbmic8 | 11 | – | 0.816 | 1.785 | 0.761 | 0.809 |
| Aealbmic12 | 11 | 0.317 | 0.819 | 1.850 | 0.574 | 0.812 |
| Aealbmic6 | 10 | – | 0.453 | 0.947 | 0.462 | 0.456 |
| Aealbmic5 | 14 | 0.108 | 0.661 | 1.364 | 0.570 | 0.667 |
| Aealbmic16 | 15 | 0.102 | 0.716 | 1.591 | 0.599 | 0.708 |
| ALB-TRI-6 | 16 | 0.091 | 0.846 | 1.973 | 0.629 | 0.824 |
| ALB-DI-6 | 13 | – | 0.744 | 1.569 | 0.485 | 0.743 |
| ALB-DI-4 | 9 | 0.139 | 0.447 | 0.880 | 0.394 | 0.466 |
| Aealbmic3 | 14 | 0.154 | 0.815 | 1.846 | 0.664 | 0.791 |
| ALB-TRI-33 | 10 | – | 0.722 | 1.451 | 0.721 | 0.721 |
| Aealbmic11 | 13 | 0.122 | 0.752 | 1.560 | 0.544 | 0.744 |
| Mean | 11.769 | 0.691 | 1.475 | 0.596 | 0.692 |
Abbreviations: PIC, polymorphic information content; SI, Shannonʼs index; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity
Fig. 2Genetic structure of Ae. albopictus within 34 locations. Each vertical bar in the plots represents an individual sample and each color represents a cluster, where the color of the bar indicates the probability of assignment to each of K optimal clusters (different colors) determined using Evanno et al.’s ΔK methods. a K = 2 for all populations. b K = 2 for 18 populations in southern and western areas. c K = 3 for 16 populations in central, eastern, and northern areas
Fig. 3Principal coordinates analysis based on co-dominant genotypic genetic distance, displaying genetic similarities among populations of Ae. albopictus sampled from different regions in China
Analysis of molecular variance of populations from seven different clusters
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Fixation index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 4 | 121.507 | 0.060 | 1.30 | ||
| Among populations within groups | 29 | 250.076 | 0.061 | 1.32 | ||
| Among individuals within populations | 943 | 4837.406 | 0.653 | 14.21 | ||
| Within individuals | 977 | 3735.000 | 3.823 | 83.16 | ||
| Total | 1953 | 8943.989 | 4.597 |
Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom
Fig. 4Genetic landscape shape plot showing patterns of spatial genetic distance for 34 populations of Ae. albopictus. The GLS interpolation analysis is shown in Surfer software, where X- and Y-axes correspond to geographical locations and the different colors of image regions represent genetic distances
Fig. 5Correlation between genetic distance [FST/(1 − FST)] and geographical distance [Ln (km)] for all locations in China. The relationship was significant (Mantel test; R2 = 0.245, P = 0.01)
The correlation of dengue incidence with six genetic indices among Ae. albopictus populations in different provinces
| Province | Allelic richness | Private allelic richness | SI | Annual dengue casesa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hainan | 7.171 | 0.181 | 4.754 | 1.748 | 0.548 | 0.278 | 56 |
| Guangdong | 6.453 | 0.047 | 3.983 | 1.559 | 0.633 | 0.093 | 9541 |
| Yunnan | 7.263 | 0.418 | 4.718 | 1.682 | 0.592 | 0.204 | 1548 |
| Guangxi | 6.183 | 0.094 | 3.542 | 1.459 | 0.591 | 0.152 | 371 |
| Guizhou | 6.106 | 0.005 | 3.784 | 1.487 | 0.577 | 0.159 | 3 |
| Chongqing | 6.530 | 0.029 | 4.485 | 1.586 | 0.647 | 0.081 | 42 |
| Sichuan | 6.320 | 0.016 | 4.000 | 1.530 | 0.561 | 0.214 | 20 |
| Hunan | 5.506 | 0.025 | 3.539 | 1.359 | 0.518 | 0.209 | 37 |
| Jiangxi | 6.379 | 0.090 | 3.982 | 1.539 | 0.553 | 0.195 | 16 |
| Hubei | 5.994 | 0.052 | 3.949 | 1.490 | 0.546 | 0.213 | 23 |
| Shanxi (west) | 5.579 | 0.000 | 3.657 | 1.394 | 0.644 | 0.028 | 11 |
| Zhejiang | 5.704 | 0.129 | 3.678 | 1.409 | 0.628 | 0.018 | 59 |
| Henan | 6.134 | 0.094 | 3.981 | 1.530 | 0.658 | 0.059 | 17 |
| Shandong | 5.811 | 0.002 | 3.917 | 1.447 | 0.582 | 0.136 | 9 |
| Shanxi (east) | 5.697 | 0.011 | 3.785 | 1.422 | 0.551 | 0.183 | 1 |
| Hebei | 5.827 | 0.001 | 3.855 | 1.434 | 0.564 | 0.133 | 8 |
| Tianjin | 5.713 | 0.002 | 3.435 | 1.359 | 0.633 | 0.031 | 4 |
| Beijing | 5.653 | 0.000 | 3.455 | 1.379 | 0.600 | 0.076 | 69 |
| Liaoning | 4.904 | 0.001 | 3.183 | 1.236 | 0.597 | 0.001 | 7 |
| Pearson’s correlation coefficientb | 0.530 | 0.551 | 0.353 | 0.455 | 0.210 | 0.089 | |
| 0.020 | 0.015 | 0.139 | 0.051 | 0.388 | 0.717 |
aFrom 2011 to 2015 (per 100,000,000 persons)
bThe annual dengue case data was rescaled with a log transformation using the equation Ln (µ), where µ is the number of cases per 100,000,000 people
Abbreviations: Ne, effective number of alleles; SI, Shannonʼs index; Ho, observed heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient