| Literature DB >> 31752321 |
Ruizhu Hu1,2, Tinglin Huang1,2, Tianwei Wang3, Huixin Wang3, Xiao Long4.
Abstract
The circulating pellet fluidized bed (CPFB) softening method is a highly efficient and environmentally friendly softening technology that can be used to reduce water hardness during the pretreatment process of circulating water in thermal power plants. The performance of chemical crystallization CPFB reactors was tested for increasing the concentration ratio and softening the circulating water in a thermal power plant in Dingzhou, Hebei. The results show that usage of CPFB reactors removed water hardness and Ca2+ ions with efficiencies exceeding 60% and 90%, respectively. The size of the particles discharged from the reactors was approximately 1-3 mm, and the content of CaO in these particles was found to be greater than 50%. All the discharged particles were reused in the desulfurization system in the power plant. The operational cost of the CPFB system is US$0.074 per cubic meter of water. After adopting the proposed CPFB softening method in the Dingzhou Power Plant, the concentration ratio of the circulation cooling water was increased from 4.5 to more than 9. In addition, the amount of replenished water and sewage discharge were both reduced by 150 m3/h, and the amount of scale inhibitor used in the system was reduced by more than 30%. These improvements contribute to approximately US$200,000 in annual savings in the power plant. In summary, the CPFB softening method demonstrated a high hardness removal rate, strong economic benefits, and remarkable environmental and social benefits. Therefore, this method seems ideal for softening replenished circulating cooling water, increasing the concentration ratio of the water and achieving zero liquid discharge (ZLD) in thermal power plants.Entities:
Keywords: circulating cooling water; circulating pellet fluidized bed; concentration ratio; thermal power plant; zero liquid discharge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31752321 PMCID: PMC6887961 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Summary of the water quality parameters of the circulating water.
| pH | Turbidity (NTU) | Total Alkalinity (mM) | HCO3− (mM) | Total Hardness (mM) | Ca2+ (mM) | Mg2+ (mM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5–7.7 | <1 | 3.1–3.5 | 3.1–3.5 | 2.3–2.75 | 1.6–1.75 | 0.7–1.0 |
Figure 1Flow chart of the circulating pellet fluidized bed softening system.
Figure 2Flow chart of the dynamic scale-inhibition simulation test.
Figure 3Hardness and Ca2+ ion removal performance of circulating pellet fluidized beds (CPFBs). ((a)-hardness and Ca2+ ion removal performance of circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) #1 at different dates; (b)-hardness and Ca2+ ion removal performance of circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) #2 at different dates; (c)-hardness and Ca2+ ion removal performance of circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) #3 at different dates).
Figure 4Dosage and cost of the chemicals used in the system under different pH conditions.
Figure 5Alkalinity removal performance of the CPFBs. ((a)-alkalinity removal performance of the circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) 1# at different dates; (b)-alkalinity removal performance of the circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) 2# at different dates; (c)-alkalinity removal performance of the circulating pellet fluidized bed(CPFB) 3# at different dates).
Figure 6SEM image of the particles discharged from the system.
Composition analysis results of the particles generated by the CPFB.
| Items | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | K2O | MnO2 | Fe2O3 | CaO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Determined Based on the Oxide Product of Different Elements) | |||||||
| Analysis results | 0.74% | 0.07% | 2.99% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 1.33% | 51.10% |
The results of dynamic scale-inhibition test.
| Water Sample | Klimit | 85% Klimit | Cl−limit (mg/L) | Ca2+limit (mg/L) | ΔB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water discharged from the CPFBR system | 10.82 | 9.20 | 238 | 92.58 | −0.20 | Chemicals were added to the water sample up to a concentration of 8.5 mg/L; acid was added to the water sample to control the p-alkalinity (≤1.0 mM) |
Suggested control parameters for circulating water.
| Indicator | Concentration Ratio | Calcium Ion (mg/L) | Hardness (mM) | P-Alkalinity (mM) | Total Alkalinity (mM) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circulating water | ≤9.20 | ≤77.28 | ≤20.08 | ≤1.0 | ≤6.6 | ≤8.75 |
The results of scale-inhibition reduction test.
| Operating Conditions | Klimit | 85% Klimit | Cl−limit (mg/L) | Ca2+limit (mg/L) | ΔB | Control Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.64 | 5.64 | 146 | 52.99 | 0.19 | Scale inhibitor concentration = 8.5 mg/L |
| 2 | 10.91 | 9.27 | 240 | 91.18 | −0.18 | Scale inhibitor concentration = 6.0 mg/L, p-alkalinity ≤ 1.0 mM, controlled by adding acid |
Figure 7Amount of water replenished to and amount of wastewater discharged from the circulating water system for different concentration ratios.
Evaluation of the economic benefits (US dollars).
| Number | Indicator | Quantity | Unit Cost | Economic Benefit (dollars per year) | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reduction in replenishing water (m3/h) | 150 | $0.398 per m3 | 480977 | Operating for 335 days a year |
| 2 | Reduction in waste discharge (m3/h) | 150 | $0.072 per m3 | 87134 | Operating for 335 days a year |
| 3 | Reduction in scale inhibitor dosage (mg/L) | 2.5 | $1.156 per ton | 22499 | Average water usage rate = 1000 m3/h |
| 4 | Amount of water replenished to the circulating water (m3/h) | 1050 | $0.072 per m3 | 390150 | Current real water volume 6,722,400 m3/y |
| 5 | Cost savings per year | 200459 |