| Literature DB >> 31750310 |
Gloria Serena1,2, Daniel Huynh1, Rosiane S Lima1, Luciana M Vise1, Rachel Freire1,2, Laura Ingano1, Maureen M Leonard1,2, Stefania Senger1,2, Alessio Fasano1,2,3.
Abstract
Celiac disease is an immune-mediated enteropathy triggered by ingestion of gluten. Although its pathogenesis has been extensively studied and the contribution from both innate and adaptive immune responses has been reported, little is still known about the contribution of macrophages to the onset or maintenance of the disease. Macrophages are extremely plastic immune cells that can be directed toward a pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotype by the surrounding microenvironment. Of note, gliadin, the most prominent causative agent of the disease, has been reported to trigger the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in this cell population. In the present study, we aimed at investigating how the intestinal milieu and more specifically the epithelium can shape the macrophage response to gliadin. Using patient-derived organoids we showed that the intestinal epithelium derived from celiac disease donors releases anti-inflammatory factors that curb the macrophage response to gliadin. Furthermore, we uncovered that the celiac macrophages were better responders than macrophages derived from non-celiac controls. Finally, we demonstrated that IFNγ released by the epithelium is in part responsible of the observed anti-inflammatory effect. Our data shed light on the cross-talk between the immune system and the epithelium and its critical role in the intestinal homeostasis. Furthermore, we provide more evidence how alterations in the innate immune machinery in celiac patients may contribute to the onset of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: celiac disease; epithelium; gliadin; innate immunity; macrophages
Year: 2019 PMID: 31750310 PMCID: PMC6848268 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Sequences for forward and reverse primers used to measure gene expression by real-time RT-PCR.
| 18S | |
| CD68 | |
| TNFα | |
| IL6 | |
| IL1β | |
| TGFβ |
Figure 1Macrophages phenotype in small intestinal biopsies of celiac patients. (A) Gene expression analysis of CD68, a pan marker for macrophages (MΦ), in small intestinal biopsies from healthy controls (HC n = 12), active celiac patients (CDA n = 17), and celiac patients in remission (CDGF n = 7). Real-time RT-PCR data were normalized to housekeeping gene 18S. (B) Percentage of total CD68+ MΦ in small intestinal lamina propria of HC (n = 4), CDA (n = 4) patients and celiac patients in remission (CDGF n = 3). (C) Representative gating strategy to calculate percentage of CD68+ cells in small intestinal biopsies of HC and CDA patients. (D) Percentage of M1 (CD80+), M2 (CD206+), and M1/M2 (CD80+CD206+) phenotypes in small intestinal lamina propria of HC (n = 4) and CDA (n = 4) patients represented as fold change over non-celiac healthy control group. (E) Representative gating strategy to calculate percentage of CD68+, M1, M2, M1/M2 cells in small intestinal biopsies of HC and CDA patients. CD80+ and CD206+ cells were calculated within the CD68+ cells gate. Statistical analysis was calculated using Mann–Whitney t-test. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2Gliadin triggers a pro-inflammatory response in human primary macrophages. (A) Gene expression for pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in human primary macrophages (MΦ) from healthy (HC n = 8) and celiac (CDGF n = 7) patients stimulated with 1 mg/ml of pepsin-trypsin digested gliadin (PTG). Each bar represents the fold change over untreated control. Real-time RT-qPCR data were normalized to housekeeping gene 18S. (B) Quantification of cytokines secreted by CDGF and HC MΦ untreated (white bars) or stimulated with PTG (stripe bars). (C) Percentage of pro-inflammatory M1 cells (CD80+) out of total MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 4) untreated (UNT) or stimulated with 1 mg/ml of PTG (PTG). (D) Gating strategy to detect CD80+ cells in MΦ untreated or stimulated with PTG. CD80+ cells were gated out of cells that were considered activated MΦ depending on FSC and SSC values. The experiment is representative of the experiment (n = 4). Statistical analysis was calculated using Mann–Whitney t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.005.
Figure 3Celiac epithelium influences macrophages response to gliadin. (A) Experiment design to investigate effect of epithelium on MΦ response to gliadin: organoids derived monolayers from healthy controls (HC n = 5) and celiac patients (CD n = 5) were plated on transwells to form polarized monolayers and treated for 4 h with 1 mg/ml of pepsin-tripsyn gliadin (PTG). Basolateral supernatants were collected and used to stimulate for 24 h human primary MΦ differentiated from circulating monocytes from HC and CDGF patients (see Materials and Methods). Total RNA from MΦ was extracted for gene expression analysis. (B) Gene expression analysis of cytokines in monocytes derived MΦ isolated from HC (n = 7) and CDGF (n = 6) patients and in vitro stimulated, respectively with supernatants of monolayers from HC (black bars n = 5) and CD (white bars n = 5) organoids. Bars represent the fold change of MΦ treated with PTG stimulated organoids over the untreated ones. (C) Percentage of M1 (CD80+), M2 (CD206+), or M1/M2 (CD80+CD206+) phenotypes in MΦ from CDGF (n = 5) patients cultured with CD epithelium. Bars represent the fold change of MΦ treated with PTG stimulated epithelium over the untreated condition. (D) Gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 4) cultured with supernatants from untreated CD monolayers (black bars), monolayers stimulated with PTG (white bars), and monolayers stimulated with PTG and extra PTG added to the MΦ themselves (gray bars). All real-time RT-PCR data were normalized to housekeeping gene 18S. Statistical analysis was calculated using paired Wilcoxon test. *P < 0.05.
Figure 4IFNγ released by the epithelium modulates macrophages response to gliadin in CD. (A) Flow-cytometry analysis evaluating activation of IFNγ receptor (IFNγR) pathway by calculating expression of IFNγR and phosphorylation of its downstream partner STAT1 (pSTAT1). Bars represent fold change of MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 5) treated with supernatants derived from CD organoids stimulated with PTG (white bars) compared to untreated (black bars). (B) Gene expression analysis of IL6 and IL1β in monocyte derived MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 8). Each bars represents fold change of MΦ stimulated with supernatants from CD monolayers treated with PTG and αIFNγ over the cells stimulated only with the PTG treated CD supernatant. (C) Gene expression analysis for IL6 and IL1β in MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 9). Each bar represents fold change of MΦ stimulated with supernatants from HC organoids treated with PTG and IFNγ over the cells stimulated only with the PTG treated HC supernatant. (D) Gene expression analysis of IL6 and IL1β in MΦ from CDGF patients (n = 3). Each bar represents fold change of MΦ stimulated PTG and IFNγ over the cells stimulated only with PTG. All real-time RT-PCR data were normalized to housekeeping gene 18S. Statistical analysis was calculated using paired Wilcoxon. *P < 0.05.
Figure 5Proposed model of epithelium contribution to macrophages' response to gliadin. Upon ingestion, gliadin is partially digested in different peptides that interact with the epithelium triggering increased intestinal permeability (1) and secretion of a vast array of cytokines (2) and chemokines (3). Circulating monocytes are recruited to the intestinal lamina propria by the epithelium released chemokines and here they differentiate into macrophages. Gliadin peptides trigger activation of macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype (4). These cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and initiate a Th1/Th17 immune response. Additionally, recognition of gliadin peptides combined with the effect of IFNγ released from the epithelium and additional unknown epithelium derived cytokines triggers also differentiation of macrophages toward an M1/M2 phenotype whose function is still under study (5).