| Literature DB >> 31750304 |
Felipe A Navarrete1, Luis Aguila1, David Martin-Hidalgo1,2, Darya A Tourzani1, Guillermina M Luque3, Goli Ardestani1, Francisco A Garcia-Vazquez4,5, Lonny R Levin6, Jochen Buck6, Alberto Darszon7, Mariano G Buffone3, Jesse Mager1, Rafael A Fissore1, Ana M Salicioni1, María G Gervasi1, Pablo E Visconti1.
Abstract
To become fertile, mammalian sperm must undergo a series of biochemical and physiological changes known as capacitation. These changes involve crosstalk between metabolic and signaling pathways and can be recapitulated in vitro. In this work, sperm were incubated in the absence of exogenous nutrients (starved) until they were no longer able to move. Once immotile, energy substrates were added back to the media and sperm motility was rescued. Following rescue, a significantly higher percentage of starved sperm attained hyperactivated motility and displayed increased ability to fertilize in vitro when compared with sperm persistently incubated in standard capacitation media. Remarkably, the effects of this treatment continue beyond fertilization as starved and rescued sperm promoted higher rates of embryo development, and once transferred to pseudo-pregnant females, blastocysts derived from treated sperm produced significantly more pups. In addition, the starvation and rescue protocol increased fertilization and embryo development rates in sperm from a severely sub-fertile mouse model, and when combined with temporal increase in Ca2+ ion levels, this methodology significantly improved fertilization and embryo development rates in sperm of sterile CatSper1 KO mice model. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) does not work in the agriculturally relevant bovine system. Here, we show that transient nutrient starvation of bovine sperm significantly enhanced ICSI success in this species. These data reveal that the conditions under which sperm are treated impact post-fertilization development and suggest that this "starvation and rescue method" can be used to improve assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in other mammalian species, including humans.Entities:
Keywords: ICSI; IVF; blastocyst; capacitation; embryo transfer; sperm
Year: 2019 PMID: 31750304 PMCID: PMC6848031 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) treatment improves sperm motility. Experimental conditions non-capacitated (NON-CAP), capacitated (CAP), sperm energy restriction without recovery (-) or sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) were established by the incubation in different media as indicated in the section “Materials and Methods.” After treatment under the different conditions, sperm motility was analyzed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Two different strains of mice were analyzed, as follows: (A) Percentage of total motility for sperm of the outbred mice strain CD1. (B) Percentage of hyperactivated motility (out of total motile) for sperm of the outbred mice strain CD1. (C) Percentage of total motility for sperm of the inbred mouse strain C57BL/6J. (D) Percentage of hyperactivated motility (out of total motile) for sperm of the inbred mouse strain C57BL/6J. In each panel, significant differences are indicated as: ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n = 5.
FIGURE 2Sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) treatment improves fertilization and embryo development rates in C57BL/6J male mice. Sperm obtained from C57BL/6J mice were incubated in C-TYH, containing glucose and pyruvate (CAP) or in F-TYH media, not containing nutrients; sperm in this medium will then be rescued by energy sources replenishment as explained in the section “Materials and Methods,” and the treatment abbreviated (SER). After treatment (CAP or SER) sperm from each condition were added to the insemination drops containing cumulus-enclosed female oocytes (COCs). (A) Percentage of fertilization calculated as percentage of oocytes that reached a two-cell embryo stage after heterologous fertilization between CD-1 female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm (n = 38, total number of oocytes CAP = 2030, total number of oocytes SER = 2024). (B) Percentage of blastocyst development calculated as percentage of two-cell embryos that reached 3.5-day blastocyst stage corresponding to embryo cultures after heterologous CD-1 female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm IVF (n = 38). (C) Percentage of total blastocyst development calculated as the percentage of 3.5-day blastocyst stage embryos out of the total number of inseminated eggs corresponding to embryo cultures after heterologous CD-1 female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm IVF (n = 38). (D) Percentage of fertilization calculated as percentage of oocytes that reached two-cell embryo stage after homologous fertilization between C57BL/6J female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm (n = 15, total number of oocytes CAP = 608, total number of oocytes SER = 685). (E) Percentage of blastocyst development calculated as percentage of the two-cell embryos that reached 3.5-day blastocyst stage from embryo cultures after homologous C57BL/6J female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm IVF (n = 15). (F) Percentage of total blastocyst development calculated as the percentage of 3.5-day blastocyst stage embryos out of the total number of inseminated eggs from embryo cultures after homologous C57BL/6J female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm IVF (n = 15). In each panel, significant differences are indicated as ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (G) Representative images of two-cell embryos obtained after heterologous, CD-1 female oocytes and C57BL/6J sperm, SER, or control IVF. Scale bar = 100 μm. (H) Representative images of heterologous IVF-derived blastocyst development at 3.5 days. Scale bar = 100 μm.
FIGURE 3Sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) treatment impacts on embryonic parameters and implantation potential after non-surgical embryo transfer. A fraction of the blastocysts derived from CAP or SER treatments as described in Figure 2 were used to evaluate the impact of these treatments in blastocyst potential. (A) Blastocysts derived from CAP- or SER-treated sperm were transferred to pseudo-pregnant recipient female mice. The total number of pups obtained from either CAP or SER treatment (n = 15) is indicated. Image shown is representative of a litter obtained after transfer of SER-derived embryos. (B) Percentage of pups born per number of embryos transferred is indicated. (C) Blastocysts derived from CAP- or SER-treated sperm were stained with Hoechst as indicated in the section “Materials and Methods.” The number of stained nuclei that represents the number of cells in each blastocyst was counted (n = 3, 35 blastocysts/treatment counted). Representative images of stained embryos are shown. Scale bar = 25 μm. (D) Blastocyst derived from CAP or SER-treated sperm were assayed for outgrowth in vitro as explained in the section “Materials and Methods” (n = 10, 205 and 210 blastocysts counted for CAP and SER-derived blastocysts, respectively). In each panel, significant differences are indicated as: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Experiments represented in this figure were done using blastocysts obtained by heterologous fertilization.
FIGURE 4Sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) treatment rescues sperm fertilization capacity and embryo development of a sub-fertile mouse strain. Sperm obtained from FerDR/DR mice were treated under CAP or SER conditions and used for insemination as described in the section “Materials and Methods.” (A) Percentage of fertilization of FerDR/DR sperm calculated as percentage of oocytes that reached two-cell embryo stage. (B) Percentage of blastocyst development calculated as percentage of the two-cell embryos that reached 3.5-day blastocyst stage. (C) Percentage of total blastocyst formation calculated as the percentage of 3.5-day blastocyst stage embryos out of the total number of inseminated eggs. (D) Representative image of a recipient female with its embryo-transferred pups. A total of three embryo transfers (ET) were performed as indicated in Supplementary Table S1. In each panel, significant differences are indicated as ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5Combination of sperm energy restriction and recovery (SER) treatment and A23187 (transient treatment) rescues sperm fertilization capacity and embryo development of infertile CatSper1 KO mice. Sperm from CatSper1 KO mice were incubated in four conditions as detailed in the section “Materials and Methods.” Briefly, the experimental conditions applied were: (1) capacitating conditions in the presence of glucose and pyruvate (CAP); (2) A23187 transient treatment (A23187 WASH); (3) capacitating conditions in the absence of glucose and pyruvate followed by replenishment of energy substrates (SER); and (4) SER treatment followed by A23187 transient treatment (SER + A23187 WASH). Sperm were used for IVF of cumulus-enclosed CD1 female oocytes. After 18 h, two-cell embryos were transferred to KSOM media and further incubated for a total of 3.5 days until blastocyst stage. (A) Percentage of fertilization calculated as percentage of oocytes that reached two-cell embryo stage. (B) Percentage of blastocyst development calculated as percentage of the two-cell embryos that reached 3.5-day blastocyst stage. (C) Representative image of 3.5-day blastocysts formation from combined SER treatment followed by A23187 transient treatment. Arrows indicate blastocysts hatching. (D) Results showing total 3.5-day blastocysts obtained from either SER-treated alone, or SER + A23187-treated sperm, that were NSET-transferred to pseudo-pregnant female recipients (n = 3), and the number of pups born after 21 days of gestation. In each panel, significant differences are indicated as ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Effect of SER treatment on the in vitro development of bovine embryos generated by ICSI, piezoelectric-aided.
| ICSI control | 5 (80) | 13 (16)b | 0 (0)b |
| ICSI + SER | 5 (84) | 42 (50)a | 7 (17)a |