Literature DB >> 31750128

A Short Term Comparison of Cartilage with Temporalis Fascia Graft Tympanoplasty in Paediatric and Adolescent Population.

Neeraj Narayan Mathur1, Vinoth Manimaran1, Anupal Deka1.   

Abstract

To compare the anatomic and functional outcomes of the cartilage and temporalis fascia graft materials in type 1 tympanoplasty in paediatric and adolescent population. A total of 55 patients aged <18 years who required type 1 tympanoplasty were selected. 30 patients underwent cartilage palisade tympanoplasty and 25 using temporalis fascia grafts. The age, the side of the operated ear, the operative technique, pre- and post operative pure tone and impedance audiological results, and the status of the graft were noted. Graft was considered taken up if there was successful closure of tympanic membrane perforation. At the end of 6 months, the graft take rate for cartilage was 90% and for temporalis fascia it was 80% (p > 0.05). ABG closure ratio in cartilage group was 58.54 ± 23.10% and in temporalis fascia group was 56.46 ± 27.4% (p > 0.05). Pre operatively all patients had type B tympanogram in both the groups. While post operatively either type A or C curve was seen in 80% patients of cartilage and 68% patients of temporalis fascia group. Hearing outcomes and graft success rates were high in both fascia and cartilage graft groups but not significantly different. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Pediatric; Temporalis fascia; Tympanoplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 31750128      PMCID: PMC6841860          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1140-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  18 in total

1.  Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.

Authors:  Arman Tek; Murat Karaman; Celil Uslu; Tülay Habeşoğlu; Yasin Kılıçarslan; Ruhi Durmuş; Senem Esen; Erol Egeli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Tympanometric volume: a predictor of success of tympanoplasty in children.

Authors:  Daniel Merenda; Kazunari Koike; Majid Shafiei; Hassan Ramadan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties.

Authors:  Sule Demirci; Arzu Tuzuner; Hatice Karadas; Cemile Acıkgoz; Refik Caylan; Ethem Erdal Samim
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Neeraj Narayan Mathur; Santosha Ram Choudhary; Abhishek Bhardwaj
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

Authors:  P Lee; G Kelly; R P Mills
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

6.  Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Inci Alkan Demirpehlivan; Kazim Onal; Secil Arslanoglu; Murat Songu; Ejder Ciger; Nazan Can
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty.

Authors:  J L Dornhoffer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Tympanoplasty in children. The Boston Children's Hospital experience.

Authors:  W M Koch; E M Friedman; T J McGill; G B Healy
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-01

9.  Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases.

Authors:  J L Sheehy; R G Anderson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty : influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Hatice Emir; Kursat Ceylan; Zeynep Kizilkaya; Hakan Gocmen; Hakki Uzunkulaoglu; Erdal Samim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.