Literature DB >> 31749277

Detection of anti-domain I antibodies by chemiluminescence enables the identification of high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome patients: A multicenter multiplatform study.

Dongmei Yin1,2, Walid Chayoua1,2, Hilde Kelchtermans1,2, Philip G de Groot2, Gary W Moore3, Jean-Christophe Gris4,5, Stéphane Zuily6, Jacek Musial7, Bas de Laat1,2, Katrien M J Devreese8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies predominantly on detecting antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Antibodies against a domain I (DI) epitope of anti-β2glycoprotein I (β2GPI) proved to be pathogenic, but are not included in the current classification criteria.
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the clinical value of detecting anti-DI IgG in APS. PATIENTS/
METHODS: From eight European centers 1005 patients were enrolled. Anti-cardiolipin (CL) and anti-β2GPI were detected by four commercially available solid phase assays; anti-DI IgG by the QUANTA Flash® β2GPI domain I assay.
RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) of anti-DI IgG for thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity proved to be higher than those of the conventional assays. Upon restriction to patients positive for anti-β2GPI IgG, anti-DI IgG positivity still resulted in significant ORs. When anti-DI IgG was added to the criteria aPLs or used as a substitute for anti-β2GPI IgG/anti-CL IgG, ORs for clinical symptoms hardly improved. Upon removing anti-DI positive patients, lupus anticoagulant remained significantly correlated with clinical complications. Anti-DI IgG are mainly present in high-risk triple positive patients, showing higher levels. Combined anti-DI and triple positivity confers a higher risk for clinical symptoms compared to only triple positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of anti-DI IgG resulted in higher ORs for clinical manifestations than the current APS classification criteria. Regardless of the platform used to detect anti-β2GPI/anti-CL, addition of anti-DI IgG measured by QUANTA Flash® did not improve the clinical associations, possibly due to reduced exposure of the pathogenic epitope of DI. Our results demonstrate that anti-DI IgG potentially helps in identifying high-risk patients.
© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiphospholipid syndrome; domain I; multicenter; pregnancy morbidity; thrombosis; β2-glycoprotein I

Year:  2020        PMID: 31749277     DOI: 10.1111/jth.14682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  4 in total

1.  Antiphospholipid Antibodies and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: From Coagulation to the Clinic.

Authors:  Rita Selby; Jameel Abdulrehman
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 2.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.

Authors:  Arne Vandevelde; Katrien M J Devreese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Current Promising Biomarkers and Methods in the Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review.

Authors:  Pavla Bradacova; Ludek Slavik; Jana Ulehlova; Adela Skoumalova; Jana Ullrychova; Jana Prochazkova; Antonin Hlusi; Gayane Manukyan; Eva Kriegova
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-02-08

4.  Role of antiphospholipid antibodies in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Katrien M J Devreese; Stéphane Zuily; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2021-11-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.