Pavla Bradacova1,2, Ludek Slavik2, Jana Ulehlova2, Adela Skoumalova3, Jana Ullrychova1, Jana Prochazkova2, Antonin Hlusi2, Gayane Manukyan4, Eva Kriegova4. 1. Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Department Clinical Hematology, 40113 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Internal Medicine III-Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic. 4. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and Faculty Hospital, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods-the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipinIgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods-the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).
Authors: A Tripodi; V Chantarangkul; M Cini; K Devreese; J S Dlott; R Giacomello; E Gray; C Legnani; M E Martinuzzo; P Pradella; A Siegemund; S Subramanian; P Suchon; S Testa Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Walid Chayoua; Hilde Kelchtermans; Jean-Christophe Gris; Gary W Moore; Jacek Musiał; Denis Wahl; Philip G de Groot; Bas de Laat; Katrien M J Devreese Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Walid Chayoua; Hilde Kelchtermans; Gary W Moore; Jean-Christophe Gris; Jacek Musial; Denis Wahl; Stéphane Zuily; Francesca Gianniello; Pierre Fontana; Jasper Remijn; Rolf T Urbanus; Bas de Laat; Katrien M J Devreese Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: M Sorice; T Griggi; A Circella; T Garofalo; F d'Agostino; V Pittoni; G M Pontieri; L Lenti; G Valesini Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 1994-07-12 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: R Cervera; R Serrano; G J Pons-Estel; L Ceberio-Hualde; Y Shoenfeld; E de Ramón; V Buonaiuto; S Jacobsen; M M Zeher; T Tarr; A Tincani; M Taglietti; G Theodossiades; E Nomikou; M Galeazzi; F Bellisai; P L Meroni; R H W M Derksen; P G D de Groot; M Baleva; M Mosca; S Bombardieri; F Houssiau; J-C Gris; I Quéré; E Hachulla; C Vasconcelos; A Fernández-Nebro; M Haro; Z Amoura; M Miyara; M Tektonidou; G Espinosa; M L Bertolaccini; M A Khamashta Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 19.103