Literature DB >> 31749071

A quantitative high-resolution computational mechanics cell model for growing and regenerating tissues.

Paul Van Liedekerke1,2, Johannes Neitsch3, Tim Johann4, Enrico Warmt5, Ismael Gonzàlez-Valverde6, Stefan Hoehme3,7, Steffen Grosser5, Josef Kaes5, Dirk Drasdo8,9,10.   

Abstract

Mathematical models are increasingly designed to guide experiments in biology, biotechnology, as well as to assist in medical decision making. They are in particular important to understand emergent collective cell behavior. For this purpose, the models, despite still abstractions of reality, need to be quantitative in all aspects relevant for the question of interest. This paper considers as showcase example the regeneration of liver after drug-induced depletion of hepatocytes, in which the surviving and dividing hepatocytes must squeeze in between the blood vessels of a network to refill the emerged lesions. Here, the cells' response to mechanical stress might significantly impact the regeneration process. We present a 3D high-resolution cell-based model integrating information from measurements in order to obtain a refined and quantitative understanding of the impact of cell-biomechanical effects on the closure of drug-induced lesions in liver. Our model represents each cell individually and is constructed by a discrete, physically scalable network of viscoelastic elements, capable of mimicking realistic cell deformation and supplying information at subcellular scales. The cells have the capability to migrate, grow, and divide, and the nature and parameters of their mechanical elements can be inferred from comparisons with optical stretcher experiments. Due to triangulation of the cell surface, interactions of cells with arbitrarily shaped (triangulated) structures such as blood vessels can be captured naturally. Comparing our simulations with those of so-called center-based models, in which cells have a largely rigid shape and forces are exerted between cell centers, we find that the migration forces a cell needs to exert on its environment to close a tissue lesion, is much smaller than predicted by center-based models. To stress generality of the approach, the liver simulations were complemented by monolayer and multicellular spheroid growth simulations. In summary, our model can give quantitative insight in many tissue organization processes, permits hypothesis testing in silico, and guide experiments in situations in which cell mechanics is considered important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell mechanics; Cell-based model; High resolution cell model; Liver regeneration; Optical stretcher

Year:  2019        PMID: 31749071      PMCID: PMC7005086          DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01204-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  66 in total

1.  Dynamical organization of the cytoskeletal cortex probed by micropipette aspiration.

Authors:  Jan Brugués; Benoit Maugis; Jaume Casademunt; Pierre Nassoy; François Amblard; Pierre Sens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling cell rheology with the Subcellular Element Model.

Authors:  Sebastian A Sandersius; Timothy J Newman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Role of cortical tension in bleb growth.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Tinevez; Ulrike Schulze; Guillaume Salbreux; Julia Roensch; Jean-François Joanny; Ewa Paluch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  LBIBCell: a cell-based simulation environment for morphogenetic problems.

Authors:  Simon Tanaka; David Sichau; Dagmar Iber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Alexander G Fletcher; Miriam Osterfield; Ruth E Baker; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Compressive stress inhibits proliferation in tumor spheroids through a volume limitation.

Authors:  Morgan Delarue; Fabien Montel; Danijela Vignjevic; Jacques Prost; Jean-François Joanny; Giovanni Cappello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The universal dynamics of tumor growth.

Authors:  Antonio Brú; Sonia Albertos; José Luis Subiza; José López García-Asenjo; Isabel Brú
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A cell-based computational model of early embryogenesis coupling mechanical behaviour and gene regulation.

Authors:  Julien Delile; Matthieu Herrmann; Nadine Peyriéras; René Doursat
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Quantitative cell-based model predicts mechanical stress response of growing tumor spheroids over various growth conditions and cell lines.

Authors:  Paul Van Liedekerke; Johannes Neitsch; Tim Johann; Kevin Alessandri; Pierre Nassoy; Dirk Drasdo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Immersed Boundary Models for Quantifying Flow-Induced Mechanical Stimuli on Stem Cells Seeded on 3D Scaffolds in Perfusion Bioreactors.

Authors:  Yann Guyot; Bart Smeets; Tim Odenthal; Ramesh Subramani; Frank P Luyten; Herman Ramon; Ioannis Papantoniou; Liesbet Geris
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Generation, Transmission, and Regulation of Mechanical Forces in Embryonic Morphogenesis.

Authors:  Joseph Sutlive; Haning Xiu; Yunfeng Chen; Kun Gou; Fengzhu Xiong; Ming Guo; Zi Chen
Journal:  Small       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  Non-destructive monitoring of 3D cell cultures: new technologies and applications.

Authors:  Marilisa Cortesi; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 3.  Bridging from single to collective cell migration: A review of models and links to experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Buttenschön; Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Quantitative modeling identifies critical cell mechanics driving bile duct lumen formation.

Authors:  Paul Van Liedekerke; Lila Gannoun; Axelle Loriot; Tim Johann; Frédéric P Lemaigre; Dirk Drasdo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Bayesian calibration of a stochastic, multiscale agent-based model for predicting in vitro tumor growth.

Authors:  Ernesto A B F Lima; Danial Faghihi; Russell Philley; Jianchen Yang; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  spheresDT/Mpacts-PiCS: Cell Tracking and Shape Retrieval in Membrane-labeled Embryos.

Authors:  Wim Thiels; Bart Smeets; Maxim Cuvelier; Francesca Caroti; Rob Jelier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.