Knut Magne Augestad1,2,3, Khayam Butt4, Dejan Ignjatovic5,6, Deborah S Keller7, Ravi Kiran7. 1. Department of Postgraduate Surgical Education, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsö, Norway. knut.magne.augestad@unn.no. 2. Department of GI Surgery, Sandnessjøen Regional Hospital, Sandnessjøen, Norway. knut.magne.augestad@unn.no. 3. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. knut.magne.augestad@unn.no. 4. Department of GI Surgery, Nordlandssykehuset, Bodø, Norway. 5. Department of GI Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 7. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the era of competency-based surgical education, VBC has gained increased attention and may enhance the efficacy of surgical education. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the existing evidence of video-based coaching (VBC) and compare VBC to traditional master-apprentice-based surgical education. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing VBC according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE and Researchgate databases were searched for eligible manuscripts. Standard mean difference (SMD) of performance scoring scales was used to assess the effect of VBC versus traditional training without VBC (control). RESULTS: Of 627 studies identified, 24 RCTs were eligible and evaluated. The studies included 778 surgical trainees (n = 386 VBC vs. n = 392 control). 13 performance scoring scales were used to assess technical competence; OSATS-GRS was the most common (n = 15). VBC was provided preoperative (n = 11), intraoperative (n = 1), postoperative (n = 10), and perioperative (n = 2). The majority of studies were unstructured, where identified coaching frameworks were PRACTICE (n = 1), GROW (n = 2) and Wisconsin Coaching Framework (n = 1). There was an effect on performance scoring scales in favor of VBC coaching (SMD 0.87, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, the residents had a larger relative effect (SMD 1.13; 0.61-1.65, p < 0.001) of VBC compared to medical students (SMD 0.43, 0.06-0.81, p < 0.001). The greatest source of potential bias was absence of blinding of the participants and personnel (n = 20). CONCLUSION: Video-based coaching increases technical performance of medical students and surgical residents. There exist significant study and intervention heterogeneity that warrants further exploration, showing the need to structure and standardize video-based coaching tools.
BACKGROUND: In the era of competency-based surgical education, VBC has gained increased attention and may enhance the efficacy of surgical education. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the existing evidence of video-based coaching (VBC) and compare VBC to traditional master-apprentice-based surgical education. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing VBC according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE and Researchgate databases were searched for eligible manuscripts. Standard mean difference (SMD) of performance scoring scales was used to assess the effect of VBC versus traditional training without VBC (control). RESULTS: Of 627 studies identified, 24 RCTs were eligible and evaluated. The studies included 778 surgical trainees (n = 386 VBC vs. n = 392 control). 13 performance scoring scales were used to assess technical competence; OSATS-GRS was the most common (n = 15). VBC was provided preoperative (n = 11), intraoperative (n = 1), postoperative (n = 10), and perioperative (n = 2). The majority of studies were unstructured, where identified coaching frameworks were PRACTICE (n = 1), GROW (n = 2) and Wisconsin Coaching Framework (n = 1). There was an effect on performance scoring scales in favor of VBC coaching (SMD 0.87, p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, the residents had a larger relative effect (SMD 1.13; 0.61-1.65, p < 0.001) of VBC compared to medical students (SMD 0.43, 0.06-0.81, p < 0.001). The greatest source of potential bias was absence of blinding of the participants and personnel (n = 20). CONCLUSION: Video-based coaching increases technical performance of medical students and surgical residents. There exist significant study and intervention heterogeneity that warrants further exploration, showing the need to structure and standardize video-based coaching tools.
Authors: Heather L Beasley; Hala N Ghousseini; Douglas A Wiegmann; Nicole A Brys; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Hala N Ghousseini; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Heather L Beasley; Douglas A Wiegmann Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yue-Yung Hu; Laura M Mazer; Steven J Yule; Alexander F Arriaga; Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Atul A Gawande; Douglas S Smink Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Valerio Celentano; Neil Smart; John McGrath; Ronan A Cahill; Antonino Spinelli; Andreas Obermair; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Pawanindra Lal; Alex M Almoudaris; Charlotte R Hitchins; Gianluca Pellino; Matthew G Browning; Takashi Ishida; Federico Luvisetto; Pinar Cingiloglu; Katherine Gash; Rhiannon Harries; Deena Harji; Francesca Di Candido; Elisa Cassinotti; Frank D McDermott; James E A Berry; Nick J Battersby; Esther Platt; Nicholas J Campain; Barrie D Keeler; Luigi Boni; Sharmila Gupta; John P Griffith; Austin G Acheson; Tom D Cecil; Mark G Coleman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ryan Daniel; Tyler McKechnie; Colin C Kruse; Marc Levin; Yung Lee; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Cagla Eskicioglu Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Mary E Byrnes; Tedi A Engler; Sudha Pavuluri R Quamme; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Geneviève Chartrand; Mikael Soucisse; Pierre Dubé; Jean-Sébastien Trépanier; Pierre Drolet; Lucas Sideris Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: B Joseph Elmunzer; Catharine M Walsh; Gretchen Guiton; Jose Serrano; Amitabh Chak; Steven Edmundowicz; Richard S Kwon; Daniel Mullady; Georgios I Papachristou; Grace Elta; Todd H Baron; Patrick Yachimski; Evan L Fogel; Peter V Draganov; Jason R Taylor; James Scheiman; Vikesh K Singh; Shyam Varadarajulu; Field F Willingham; Gregory A Cote; Peter B Cotton; Violette Simon; Rebecca Spitzer; Rajesh Keswani; Sachin Wani Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 9.427