| Literature DB >> 31748839 |
Stephanie Inhuber1, Nico Sollmann2, Sarah Schlaeger2,3, Michael Dieckmeyer2,3, Egon Burian2, Caroline Kohlmeyer4, Dimitrios C Karampinos3, Jan S Kirschke2, Thomas Baum2, Florian Kreuzpointner4, Ansgar Schwirtz4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of the thigh muscle fat composition using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide surrogate markers in subjects suffering from various musculoskeletal disorders including knee osteoarthritis or neuromuscular diseases. However, little is known about the relationship with muscle strength. Therefore, we investigated the associations of thigh muscle fat with isometric strength measurements.Entities:
Keywords: Healthy volunteers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscle contraction (isometric); Muscle strength; Thigh
Year: 2019 PMID: 31748839 PMCID: PMC6868073 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0123-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol Exp ISSN: 2509-9280
Fig. 1Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and placement of regions of interest (ROIs). a Representative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) map. b PDFF map with superimposition of manually segmented muscle compartments defined as ROIs: (1) right quadriceps muscle, (2) left quadriceps muscle, (3) right ischiocrural muscles, and (4) left ischiocrural muscles. The red lines around the thigh represent the segmentation of the entire thigh contour
Fig. 2Setup for measurements of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with a rotational dynamometer
Proton density fat fraction (PDFF), relative cross-sectional area (relCSA), and relative maximum voluntary isometric contraction (relMVIC) in extension and flexion
| Males | Females | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDFF and relCSA | ||||
| PDFF quadriceps (%) | Left | 2.7 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 0.162 |
| Right | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 1.3 | 0.105 | |
| PDFF ischiocrural (%) | Left | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 4.6 ± 2.0 | 0.091 |
| Right | 2.6 ± 1.9 | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 0.025 | |
| relCSA quadriceps (%) | Left | 26.5 ± 4.0 | 21.3 ± 4.1 | 0.010 |
| Right | 25.8 ± 4.2 | 21.8 ± 3.7 | 0.035 | |
| relCSA ischiocrural (%) | Left | 8.3 ± 2.4 | 6.0 ± 2.4 | 0.045 |
| Right | 7.5 ± 3.0 | 6.6 ± 1.6 | 0.418 | |
| RelMVIC in extension and flexion | ||||
| relMVIC in extension (N*m3/kg) | Left | 8.0 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| Right | 8.8 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 | |
| relMVIC in flexion (N*m3/kg) | Left | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
| Right | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 | |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
Correlation between the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) or relative cross-sectional area (relCSA) and relative maximum voluntary isometric contraction (relMVIC) in extension and flexion (males and females together)
| relMVIC | relCSA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | Right | Left | Right | |||
| Extension | PDFF | -0.649 0.002 | -0.612 0.004 | -0.284 0.225 | -0.308 0.186 | |
| relCSA | 0.585 0.007 | 0.448 0.048 | – | – | ||
| Flexion | PDFF | -0.446 0.049 | -0.676 0.001 | -0.125 0.599 | -0.173 0.465 | |
| relCSA | 0.238 0.312 | 0.207 0.380 | – | – | ||
Fig. 3Correlation between the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and relative maximum voluntary isometric contraction (relMVIC). Plots showing the association between the left or right relMVIC in extension or flexion (in N*m3/kg) and the PDFF (in %) of the left or right quadriceps or ischiocrural muscles
Fig. 4Correlation between the relative cross-sectional area (relCSA) and relative maximum voluntary isometric contraction (relMVIC). Plots showing the association between the left or right relMVIC in extension or flexion (in N*m3/kg) and the relative CSA (in %) of the left or right quadriceps or ischiocrural muscles