Literature DB >> 12223173

EMG-angle relationship of the hamstring muscles during maximum knee flexion.

Hideaki Onishi1, Ryo Yagi, Mineo Oyama, Kiyokazu Akasaka, Kouji Ihashi, Yasunobu Handa.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the EMG-joint angle relationship during voluntary contraction with maximum effort and the differences in activity among three hamstring muscles during knee flexion. Ten healthy subjects performed maximum voluntary isometric and isokinetic knee flexion. The isometric tests were performed for 5 s at knee angles of 60 and 90 degrees. The isokinetic test, which consisted of knee flexion from 0 to 120 degrees in the prone position, was performed at an angular velocity of 30 degrees /s (0.523 rad/s). The knee flexion torque was measured using a KIN-COM isokinetic dynamometer. The individual EMG activity of the hamstrings, i.e. the semitendinosus, semimembranosus, long head of the biceps femoris and short head of the biceps femoris muscles, was detected using a bipolar fine wire electrode. With isometric testing, the knee flexion torque at 60 degrees knee flexion was greater than that at 90 degrees. The mean peak isokinetic torque occurred from 15 to 30 degrees knee flexion angle and then the torque decreased as the knee angle increased (p<0.01). The EMG activity of the hamstring muscles varied with the change in knee flexion angle except for the short head of the biceps femoris muscle under isometric condition. With isometric contraction, the integrated EMGs of the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles at a knee flexion angle of 60 degrees were significantly lower than that at 90 degrees. During maximum isokinetic contraction, the integrated EMGs of the semitendinosus, semimembranosus and short head of the biceps femoris muscles increased significantly as the knee angle increased from 0 to 105 degrees of knee flexion (p<0.05). On the other hand, the integrated EMG of the long head of the biceps femoris muscle at a knee angle of 60 degrees was significantly greater than that at 90 degrees knee flexion with isometric testing (p<0.01). During maximum isokinetic contraction, the integrated EMG was the greatest at a knee angle between 15 and 30 degrees, and then significantly decreased as the knee angle increased from 30 to 120 degrees (p<0.01). These results demonstrate that the EMG activity of hamstring muscles during maximum isometric and isokinetic knee flexion varies with change in muscle length or joint angle, and that the activity of the long head of the biceps femoris muscle differs considerably from the other three heads of hamstrings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12223173     DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00033-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  33 in total

Review 1.  Hamstring strain injuries: factors that lead to injury and re-injury.

Authors:  David A Opar; Morgan D Williams; Anthony J Shield
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Differences in the electromyographic activity of the hamstring muscles during maximal eccentric knee flexion.

Authors:  Ayako Higashihara; Takashi Ono; Jun Kubota; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscle activity as a function of wrist joint angle during two-digit grasping.

Authors:  Jamie A Johnston; Lisa R Bobich; Marco Santello
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Electromyographic evaluation of high-intensity elastic resistance exercises for lower extremity muscles during bed rest.

Authors:  Jonas Vinstrup; Sebastian Skals; Joaquin Calatayud; Markus Due Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Matheus Daros Pinto; Mikel Izquierdo; Yuling Wang; Mette K Zebis; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Selective contribution of each hamstring muscle to anterior cruciate ligament protection and tibiofemoral joint stability in leg-extension exercise: a simulation study.

Authors:  Andrea Biscarini; Fabio Massimo Botti; Vito Enrico Pettorossi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Model-based estimation of knee stiffness.

Authors:  Serge Pfeifer; Heike Vallery; Michael Hardegger; Robert Riener; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Influence of Altered Knee Angle and Muscular Contraction Type on Electromyographic Activity of Hamstring Muscles during 45° Hip Extension Exercise.

Authors:  Taspol Keerasomboon; Shinshiro Mineta; Norikazu Hirose
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Dynamics of Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Contraction.

Authors:  Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Pranati Pillutla; Zhaoyan Zhang; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Effects of working posture and roof slope on activation of lower limb muscles during shingle installation.

Authors:  Amrita Dutta; Scott P Breloff; Fei Dai; Erik W Sinsel; Christopher M Warren; Robert E Carey; John Z Wu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.