Literature DB >> 31748424

Effect of lidocaine cream analgesia for chest drain tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Shin-Nosuke Watanabe1, Kazuhiro Imai2, Tetsu Kimura3, Yoshitaro Saito1, Shinogu Takashima1, Ikuo Matsuzaki1, Nobuyasu Kurihara1, Maiko Atari1, Tsubasa Matsuo1, Hidenobu Iwai1, Yusuke Sato1, Satoru Motoyama1, Kyoko Nomura4, Toshiaki Nishikawa3, Yoshihiro Minamiya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain management makes an important contribution to good respiratory care and early recovery after thoracic surgery. Although the development of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has led to improved patient outcomes, chest tube removal could be distressful experience for many patients. The aim of this trial was to test whether the addition of lidocaine cream would have a significant impact on the pain treatment during chest tube removal from patients who had undergone VATS for lung cancer.
METHODS: This clinical trial was a double-blind randomized study. Forty patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer amenable to lobectomy/segmentectomy were enrolled. All patients had standard perioperative care. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either epidural anesthesia plus placebo cream (placebo, Group P) or epidural anesthesia plus 7% lidocaine cream cutaneously around the chest tube insertion site and on the skin over the tube's course 20 min (Group L) before chest drain removal.
RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were higher in Group P (median 5, IQR, 3.25-8) than in Group L (median 2, IQR, 1-3). Pain intensities measured using a PainVision system were also higher in Group P (median 296.7, IQR, 216.9-563.5) than Group L (median 41.2, IQR, 11.8-97.0). VAS scores and the pain intensity associated with chest drain removal were significantly lower in Group L than Group P (p=0.0002 vs p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Analgesia using lidocaine cream is a very simple way to reduce the pain of chest tube removal after VATS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000013824. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute pain; pain measurement; postoperative pain

Year:  2019        PMID: 31748424     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  4 in total

1.  Optimal Timing of Intravenous Acetaminophen Administration for Postoperative Analgesia.

Authors:  Maho Shinoda; Akiko Nishimura; Erika Sugiyama; Hitoshi Sato; Takehiko Iijima
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Evaluation of Eye-Pain Severity between Dry-Eye Subtypes.

Authors:  Yamato Yoshikawa; Norihiko Yokoi; Hiroaki Kato; Rieko Sakai; Aoi Komuro; Yukiko Sonomura; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Chie Sotozono
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Randomized controlled trial of an alternative drainage strategy vs routine chest tube insertion for postoperative pain after thoracoscopic wedge resection.

Authors:  Shoucun Wei; Guangyan Zhang; Jue Ma; Lidan Nong; Jiatao Zhang; Wenzhao Zhong; Jianxiu Cui
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Lidocaine inhibited migration of NSCLCA549 cells via the CXCR4 regulation.

Authors:  Baichun Xing; Linlin Yang; Yanan Cui
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.828

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.