| Literature DB >> 33503963 |
Yamato Yoshikawa1,2, Norihiko Yokoi2, Hiroaki Kato2, Rieko Sakai2, Aoi Komuro2, Yukiko Sonomura2, Tsunehiko Ikeda1, Chie Sotozono2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess eye pain between dry eye (DE) subtypes using questionnaires and the PainVision® (Osachi) apparatus. This study involved 52 eyes of 52 DE patients with eye pain (43 females and 9 males; mean age: 64.2 ± 13.2 (mean ± SD) years) who were classified into three DE subtypes (aqueous deficient DE (ADDE); decreased wettability DE (DWDE); and increased evaporation DE (IEDE)) based on fluorescein breakup pattern. In all subjects, severity of eye pain was evaluated using PainVision®, the DE-symptom-questionnaire visual analog scale (DSQ-VAS), and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2). The severity of eye pain was compared between the three DE subtypes. PainVision® findings revealed greater severity of eye pain in ADDE and DWDE than in IEDE (p < 0.05, respectively), despite no difference being found in each questionnaire. A significant correlation was found between eye pain in DSQ-VAS and continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, and total pain in SF-MPQ-2 (R = 0.50, 0.49, 0.47, and 0.56, respectively) (all: p < 0.001). Greater severity of eye pain was found in ADDE and DWDE than in IEDE, and PainVision® was found useful for the objective assessment of eye pain.Entities:
Keywords: breakup pattern; dry eye; eye fatigue; eye pain; heavy eyelids; pain quantitative measuring device; questionnaire
Year: 2021 PMID: 33503963 PMCID: PMC7911415 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418