Literature DB >> 31748245

Oncologic outcome after completing or abandoning (radical) hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of lymph node positivity; ABRAX (ABandoning RAd hyst in cerviX cancer).

Lukas Dostalek1, Ingo Runnebaum2, Francesco Raspagliesi3, Ignace Vergote4,5, Ladislav Dusek6, Jiri Jarkovsky7, David Cibula8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with intraoperative detection of lymph node involvement remains controversial. The most significant aspect is the decision regarding the completion of the cervical procedure, such as hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, or a fertility sparing procedure. PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the ABandoning RAd hyst in cerviX cancer (ABRAX) trial is to determine whether the completion of the cervical procedure (ie, radical hysterectomy) improves oncological outcome in patients with intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement before they are referred for definitive chemoradiation. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that, in patients with intraoperative lymph node involvement, completion of radical hysterectomy or other cervical procedure does not improve the oncological outcome of definitive chemoradiation. TRIAL
DESIGN: The ABRAX trial is a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. Patients with negative lymph nodes in clinical staging, in whom lymph node involvement is detected intraoperatively, are included. Completion or abandonment of the planned cervical procedure stratifies the cohort into two subgroups in which oncological outcome and morbidity will be compared. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with early stage (pT1a-pT2b) cervical cancer, who did not have positive lymph nodes on preoperative imaging, who were scheduled for primary surgical treatment, and in whom metastatic involvement of pelvic lymph node was found during surgery either as a grossly (macroscopically) involved or on intraoperative pathology assessment will be enrolled. Patients can be included irrespective of surgical approach (minimal invasive surgery or laparotomy) and type of cervical procedure performed (hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, or a fertility sparing procedure). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint of this retrospective study is a progression free survival in two subgroups with abandoned or completed cervical procedure followed by definitive chemoradiation in both groups. SAMPLE SIZE: The assumed sample size is 718 patients (in total for both groups). ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING
RESULTS: Estimated end of data collection: December 2019; estimated date of presenting results: Q2/3 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04037124. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; radiation; sentinel lymph node and lympadenectomy; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31748245     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

1.  Utility of Scoring System for Screening and Early Warning of Cervical Cancer Based on Big Data Analysis.

Authors:  Dan Hou; Binjie Yang; Yangdan Li; Ming Sun
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 2.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2020.

Authors:  Yoo Young Lee; Min Chul Choi; Jeong Yeol Park; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Tumor Volume Predicts High-Risk Patients and Guides Initial Chemoradiotherapy for Early Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhang; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang; Keng Shen; Yonglan He; Huadan Xue
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Assessment of ESGO Quality Indicators in Cervical Cancer Surgery: A Real-World Study in a High-Volume Chinese Hospital.

Authors:  Yan Ding; Xuyin Zhang; Junjun Qiu; Jianfeng Zhang; Keqin Hua
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Does completion of radical hysterectomy improve oncological outcomes of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of nodal involvement?: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cui Hu; Yu Xu; Qianwen Zhang; Qing Liu; Yi Du; Ya Jia; Yue-Dong He; Ai Zheng; Hui Xu; Shuang-Shuang Cui; Yong Tian; Lin Ran; Fengmei Ke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Estimation risk of lymph nodal invasion in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: Cervical cancer application.

Authors:  Benedetta Guani; Thomas Gaillard; Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin; Vincent Balaya; Anis Feki; Xavier Paoletti; Patrice Mathevet; Marie Plante; Fabrice Lecuru
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Risk factors for postoperative pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with cervical cancer: evidences for management strategies.

Authors:  Meng Li; Qing Tian
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.