| Literature DB >> 35795701 |
Dan Hou1, Binjie Yang1, Yangdan Li2, Ming Sun1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the utility of the scoring system for screening and early warning of cervical cancer based on big data analysis.Entities:
Keywords: big data analysis; cervical cancer screening; intervention measures; scoring system for early warning; utility
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795701 PMCID: PMC9251193 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.920956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Clinical data of study subjects.
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| 18–26 years | 13.10 (55/420) |
| 27–40 years | 28.33 (119/420) |
| 41–60 years | 42.62 (179/420) |
| >60 years | 15.95 (67/420) |
|
| |
| <18.5 | 10.95 (46/420) |
| 18.5–24.9 | 40.24 (169/420) |
| 25.0–29.9 | 34.29 (144/420) |
| ≥30.0 | 14.52 (61/420) |
|
| |
| Employee of organizations, enterprises, public institutions | 10.00 (42/420) |
| Service personnel | 32.38 (136/420) |
| Farmer | 20.24 (85/420) |
| Worker | 15.00 (63/420) |
| Self-employed entrepreneur | 16.43 (69/420) |
| Others | 5.95 (25/420) |
|
| |
| Rural area | 57.86% (243/420) |
| Urban area | 42.14% (177/420) |
|
| |
| Junior college and above | 18.81% (79/420) |
| Senior high school | 35.00% (147/420) |
| Junior high school and below | 39.52% (166/420) |
| Illiteracy | 6.67% (28/420) |
|
| |
| Medical insurance | 54.52 (229/420) |
| Self-paying | 45.48 (191/420) |
|
| |
| ≥3,000 | 49.52 (208/420) |
| <3,000 | 50.48 (212/420) |
Figure 1Clinical diagnostic efficacy of the rating questionnaire for screening and early warning of cervical cancer.
Comparison of the coincidence rate, specificity and sensitivity of early warning score diagnosis.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.848 | 0.028 | 97.22% | 86.46% | 0.794-0.902 |
Comparison of various high-risk HPV infections in different cervical cancer lesions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 24 | 34 | 26 | 8 |
| 18 | 27 | 32 | 26 | 7 |
| 31 | 31 | 25 | 30 | 6 |
| 33 | 34 | 27 | 26 | 5 |
| 35 | 36 | 23 | 26 | 7 |
| 39 | 40 | 30 | 18 | 4 |
| 45 | 38 | 28 | 19 | 7 |
| 51 | 35 | 29 | 22 | 6 |
| 52 | 34 | 32 | 22 | 4 |
| 56 | 32 | 29 | 26 | 5 |
| 58 | 36 | 30 | 21 | 5 |
| 59 | 33 | 28 | 27 | 4 |
| 66 | 32 | 36 | 18 | 6 |
| 68 | 29 | 35 | 23 | 5 |
Control effect on high-risk population above the threshold [n(%)].
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Before intervention | 35 (38.04%) | 57 (61.96%) | 28 (30.43%) | 31 (33.70%) | 24 (26.09%) | 9 (9.78%) |
| After intervention | 21 (22.83%) | 36 (39.13%) | 16 (17.39%) | 22 (23.91%) | 22 (23.91%) | 8 (8.70%) |
| X2 | 5.031 | 9.588 | 4.301 | 2.417 | 0.116 | 0.065 |
| P | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | 0.143 | 0.733 | 0.799 |