Literature DB >> 31747343

A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right.

Patrick S Forscher1,2, Nour S Kteily3.   

Abstract

The 2016 U.S. presidential election coincided with the rise of the "alternative right," or alt-right. Alt-right associates have wielded considerable influence on the current administration and on social discourse, but the movement's loose organizational structure has led to disparate portrayals of its members' psychology and made it difficult to decipher its aims and reach. To systematically explore the alt-right's psychology, we recruited two U.S. samples: An exploratory sample through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (N = 827, alt-right n = 447) and a larger, nationally representative sample through the National Opinion Research Center's Amerispeak panel (N = 1,283, alt-right n = 71-160, depending on the definition). We estimate that 6% of the U.S. population and 10% of Trump voters identify as alt-right. Alt-right adherents reported a psychological profile more reflective of the desire for group-based dominance than economic anxiety. Although both the alt-right and non-alt-right Trump voters differed substantially from non-alt-right, non-Trump voters, the alt-right and Trump voters were quite similar, differing mainly in the alt-right's especially high enthusiasm for Trump, suspicion of mainstream media, trust in alternative media, and desire for collective action on behalf of Whites. We argue for renewed consideration of overt forms of bias in contemporary intergroup research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alt-right; extremism; intergroup relations; political psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31747343      PMCID: PMC6980479          DOI: 10.1177/1745691619868208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  16 in total

Review 1.  An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.

Authors:  P Glick; S T Fiske
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action.

Authors:  Nicole Tausch; Julia C Becker; Russell Spears; Oliver Christ; Rim Saab; Purnima Singh; Roomana N Siddiqui
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-07

3.  The unthinking or confident extremist? Political extremists are more likely than moderates to reject experimenter-generated anchors.

Authors:  Mark J Brandt; Anthony M Evans; Jarret T Crawford
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-15

4.  Fear among the extremes: how political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation.

Authors:  Jan-Willem van Prooijen; André P M Krouwel; Max Boiten; Lennart Eendebak
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-02-04

Review 5.  Whites See Racism as a Zero-Sum Game That They Are Now Losing.

Authors:  Michael I Norton; Samuel R Sommers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05

6.  At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives.

Authors:  Peter H Ditto; Brittany S Liu; Cory J Clark; Sean P Wojcik; Eric E Chen; Rebecca H Grady; Jared B Celniker; Joanne F Zinger
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-31

7.  On the precipice of a "majority-minority" America: perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans' political ideology.

Authors:  Maureen A Craig; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-04-03

8.  The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization.

Authors:  Nour Kteily; Emile Bruneau; Adam Waytz; Sarah Cotterill
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-06-29

9.  Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election.

Authors:  John Bryden; Eric Silverman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measuring extremist archetypes: Scale development and validation.

Authors:  Milan Obaidi; Sara W Skaar; Simon Ozer; Jonas R Kunst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Tara C Dennehy; Andrew S Baron
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.