Literature DB >> 31747029

Perceived Comparative Harm of Cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.

Amy L Nyman1, Jidong Huang2, Scott R Weaver3, Michael P Eriksen2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31747029      PMCID: PMC6902805          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Scientific evidence on the health risks associated with using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) is rapidly evolving. Perceived harm of ENDS is also changing rapidly. The percentage of US adults, including current smokers, who perceive using ENDS as equally or more harmful than smoking cigarettes increased between 2012 and 2015, with rates stable through 2017.[1] Comparative harm perceptions are important factors associated with smokers’ decisions to use ENDS[2,3] and have implications for population health. This study uses data from late 2018 to assess changes in US adults’ comparative harm perceptions of ENDS and cigarettes after a year characterized by intense public debate and regulatory efforts to restrict youth access to ENDS.

Methods

This survey study was approved by the institutional review board at Georgia State University with a waiver of informed consent because the study posed minimal risk to participants, data were deidentified, and the KnowledgePanel[4] invitation to participate in the study contained some elements of informed consent. We followed the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) reporting guideline. Data were obtained from the Tobacco Products and Risk Perceptions Surveys conducted in August through September 2017 and November through December 2018 by the Georgia State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science. The Tobacco Products and Risk Perceptions Survey is an annual cross-sectional survey of a probability sample and representative oversample of preidentified cigarette smokers drawn from KnowledgePanel,[4] a web panel designed to be representative of noninstitutionalized US adults 18 years and older. In total, 5992 US adults completed the 2017 survey (cumulative response rate, 5.8%) and 5989 US adults completed the 2018 survey (cumulative response rate, 6.0%). Study-specific poststratification weights, based on demographic and geographic distributions from the Current Population Surveys as benchmarks for adjustment, were computed using an iterative proportional fitting procedure adjusting for survey nonresponse. Comparative perceived harm of ENDS vs cigarettes was asked of those aware of ENDS and was measured as follows: “Is using electronic vapor products less harmful, about the same, or more harmful than smoking regular cigarettes?” Response options were much less harmful, less harmful, about the same level of harm, more harmful, much more harmful, and I don’t know. Weighted point estimates and 95% CIs were obtained, and differences between 2017 and 2018 data were assessed by χ2 tests of association. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software Complex Samples module version 25 (IBM). P values were 2-sided, and statistical significance was set at less than .05. Analyses were conducted in May and June 2019.

Results

There were 5357 participants (mean [SD] age, 47.5 [17.1] years; 2660 [49.7%] women) in our 2017 sample and 5445 participants (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [17.2] years; 2849 [52.3%] women) in our 2018 sample. After study-specific poststratification weights were included, the 2017 sample included 51.0% women and the 2018 sample included 50.9% women. Between 2017 and 2018, the percentage of US adults who perceived ENDS to be less harmful than cigarettes decreased (29.3% [95% CI, 27.8%-30.7%] vs 25.8% [95% CI, 24.4%-27.2%]), while there was an increase in the proportion of US adults who perceived ENDS to be more harmful (2.4% [95% CI, 2.0%-2.9%] vs 4.4% [95% CI, 3.9%-5.1%]) or much more harmful (1.9% [95% CI, 1.5%-2.5%] vs 3.7% [95% CI, 3.1%-4.4%]) (Table). Between 2017 and 2018, ENDS were increasingly perceived to be much more harmful among current smokers (1.8% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.9%] vs 4.4% [95% CI, 3.1%-6.4%]) and former smokers (1.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-1.9%] vs 3.5% [95% CI, 2.5%-4.8%]). The percentage of adults perceiving ENDS to be equally as harmful as cigarettes also increased from 36.4% (95% CI, 34.9%-38.0%) to 43.0% (95% CI, 41.5%-44.6%), while the percentage of adults uncertain of the comparative harm decreased from 25.3% (95% CI, 24.0%-26.7%) to 19.3% (95% CI, 18.0%-20.5%).
Table.

Perceived Harm of ENDS Relative to Combustible Cigarettes Among US Adults in 2017 and 2018

Smoking StatusRespondents, % (95% CI)aP Valueb
20172018
Overall respondents, No.c53575445
Much less harmful4.7 (4.0-5.4)3.8 (3.2-4.5)<.001
Less harmful29.3 (27.8-30.7)25.8 (24.4-27.2)
About the same level36.4 (34.9-38.0)43.0 (41.5-44.6)
More harmful2.4 (2.0-2.9)4.4 (3.9-5.1)
Much more harmful1.9 (1.5-2.5)3.7 (3.1-4.4)
Do not know25.3 (24.0-26.7)19.3 (18.0-20.5)
Never smokers, No.26532801
Much less harmful3.6 (2.8-4.6)2.3 (1.7-3.0)<.001
Less harmful31.3 (29.3-33.4)27.7 (25.9-29.7)
About the same level37.4 (35.3-39.6)44.7 (42.6-46.8)
More harmful1.9 (1.3-2.6)4.8 (4.0-5.8)
Much more harmful2.5 (1.9-3.3)3.7 (2.9-4.6)
Do not know23.4 (21.6-25.3)16.8 (15.3-18.4)
Former smokers, No.15331505
Much less harmful4.9 (3.8-6.4)5.2 (3.9-6.9)<.001
Less harmful27.5 (25.1-30.1)23.0 (20.6-25.5)
About the same level35.9 (33.1-38.8)41.5 (38.6-44.3)
More harmful2.7 (2.0-3.7)3.3 (2.5-4.4)
Much more harmful1.0 (0.5-1.9)3.5 (2.5-4.8)
Do not know27.9 (25.4-30.6)23.6 (21.2-26.3)
Current smokers, No.11711139
Much less harmful8.0 (6.2-10.4)7.1 (5.3-9.4).001
Less harmful25.5 (22.4-28.8)23.5 (20.6-26.7)
About the same level33.9 (30.5-37.4)39.3 (35.7-43.1)
More harmful3.7 (2.6-5.2)5.2 (3.8-7.0)
Much more harmful1.8 (1.1-2.9)4.4 (3.1-6.4)
Do not know27.1 (23.9-30.5)20.5 (17.7-23.6)
Current ENDS users, No.411460
Much less harmful24.0 (19.3-29.3)19.4 (15.3-24.3).35
Less harmful37.7 (32.0-43.7)39.3 (33.9-44.9)
About the same level20.0 (15.7-25.0)26.1 (21.4-31.5)
More harmful4.2 (2.1-8.0)3.6 (2.0-6.6)
Much more harmful1.2 (0.6-2.4)1.6 (0.7-3.8)
Do not know13.1 (9.4-17.9)9.9 (7.2-13.6)
Dual cigarettes and ENDS users, No.d245228
Much less harmful18.9 (13.6-25.7)19.5 (13.9-26.6).87
Less harmful32.3 (25.1-40.4)34.5 (27.2-42.7)
About the same level30.1 (23.2-38.1)32.7 (24.9-41.5)
More harmful4.1 (1.9-8.5)2.5 (1.0-6.2)
Much more harmful2.1 (0.9-4.5)1.2 (0.3-4.4)
Do not know12.5 (7.8-19.5)9.6 (6.1-14.8)

Abbreviation: ENDS, electronic nicotine delivery systems.

All percentages are weighted.

Based on χ2 tests of association.

Total of never, former, and current smokers.

Not combined with current ENDS users or any smoker group.

Abbreviation: ENDS, electronic nicotine delivery systems. All percentages are weighted. Based on χ2 tests of association. Total of never, former, and current smokers. Not combined with current ENDS users or any smoker group.

Discussion

This survey study including data from late 2018, before the reported lung disease outbreak and deaths associated with vaping of 2019,[5] found an increase in the proportion of US adults who perceived ENDS to be equally or more harmful than cigarettes. Notably, an increase in perceiving ENDS as much more harmful than cigarettes was observed among cigarette smokers, which may influence their decision to try or switch to ENDS use. The increase in perceived risk of ENDS from 2017 to 2018 may be associated with media coverage[6] and the political and regulatory response to the rise in youth ENDS use in 2018. Given the recent surge in reported cases of lung illness associated with vaping and the rapidly evolving evidence, the extent of public uncertainty about the comparative harm of ENDS and cigarettes may have increased since 2018. A limitation of this study is that perceived harm of ENDS vs cigarettes was measured by a general question that did not describe specific health risks associated with product use. Perceptions of harm pertaining to specific diseases may differ from overall risk perceptions associated with ENDS use. In addition, these data were collected before the current vaping-related illness outbreak, and any resulting changes in perception are not captured by this study. Continued monitoring of comparative risk perceptions is warranted.
  4 in total

1.  Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Erin Keely O'Brien; Karl Poonai
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Chul-Joo Lee; Rebekah H Nagler; Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Changing Perceptions of Harm of e-Cigarette vs Cigarette Use Among Adults in 2 US National Surveys From 2012 to 2017.

Authors:  Jidong Huang; Bo Feng; Scott R Weaver; Terry F Pechacek; Paul Slovic; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Product attributes important to US adult consumers' use of electronic nicotine delivery systems: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Leah M Ranney; Erin L Sutfin; Keith Chrzan; Christopher J Wretman; Chineme Enyioha; Clare Meernik; Micah Berman; Gary A Zarkin; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  What are the reasons that smokers reject ENDS? A national probability survey of U.S. Adult smokers, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Scott R Weaver; J Wesley Heath; David L Ashley; Jidong Huang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  The Mediating Effect of E-Cigarette Harm Perception in the Relationship between E-Cigarette Advertising Exposure and E-Cigarette Use.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Shu Xu; Le Li; Omar El-Shahawy; Nicholas Freudenberg; Jenni A Shearston; Scott E Sherman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Risk perception of IQOS™ and cigarettes: Temporal and cross-country comparisons.

Authors:  Suzana AlMoosawi; Martha Bajec; Nelly Mainy; Gerd Kallischnigg; Bertram Zwisele; Karina Fischer; Pierpaolo Magnani; Steve Roulet
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  What Motivates Smokers to Switch to ENDS? A Qualitative Study of Perceptions and Use.

Authors:  Abigail T Evans; Katherine C Henderson; Anna Geier; Scott R Weaver; Claire Adams Spears; David L Ashley; Meredith Fritz; Lisa John; Terry F Pechacek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Smokers' Likelihood to Engage With Information and Misinformation on Twitter About the Relative Harms of e-Cigarette Use: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jessica Liu; Caroline Wright; Philippa Williams; Olga Elizarova; Jennifer Dahne; Jiang Bian; Yunpeng Zhao; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Emotional Responses and Perceived Relative Harm Mediate the Effect of Exposure to Misinformation about E-Cigarettes on Twitter and Intention to Purchase E-Cigarettes among Adult Smokers.

Authors:  Jessica Liu; Caroline Wright; Olga Elizarova; Jennifer Dahne; Jiang Bian; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Information and sin goods: Experimental evidence on cigarettes.

Authors:  Johanna Catherine Maclean; John Buckell
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Developing and Validating Measures of Absolute and Relative E-Cigarette Product Risk Perceptions: Single Items Can Be Surprisingly Comprehensive.

Authors:  Erin Keely O'Brien; Sabeeh A Baig; Alexander Persoskie
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.825

9.  Association of the US Outbreak of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury With Perceived Harm of e-Cigarettes Compared With Cigarettes.

Authors:  Harry Tattan-Birch; Jamie Brown; Lion Shahab; Sarah E Jackson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

10.  News events and their relationship with US vape sales: an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Kamila Janmohamed; Shinpei Nakamura-Sakai; Abdul-Nasah Soale; Laura Forastiere; Frederick L Altice; Navin Kumar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.