BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People's perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, compared with cigarettes, may influence their product use decisions. We tested if perceiving e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes predicted whether cigarette and e-cigarette dual users switched their product use status 1 year later, becoming exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, or non-users of both product types. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of waves 2 (2014-15) and 3 (2015-16) of the prospective, national Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who reported using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 2 reported their perceptions of e-cigarette harm at wave 2, and reported whether they used cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 3 (n = 2211). MEASUREMENTS: The key predictor was wave 2 perceptions of e-cigarette harm compared with cigarettes ('less harmful,' 'about the same', 'more harmful' or 'don't know'). The key outcome was wave 3 past 30-day use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, classified into four categories: exclusive e-cigarette use (i.e. use of e-cigarettes but not cigarettes), exclusive cigarette smoking (i.e. use of cigarettes but not e-cigarettes), dual use of both product types and non-use of both product types. FINDINGS: At wave 2, 59.4% of dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes [95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.9, 61.9]. Compared with those with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users 1 year later [7.5 versus 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.7-4.8], more likely to remain dual users (39.6 versus 29.9%; aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8), less likely to become exclusive cigarette smokers (44.8 versus 59.4%; aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.7) and similarly likely to become non-users of both product types (8.2 versus 8.0%; aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: US adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes who perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes appear to be more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use, more likely to remain dual users and less likely to switch to exclusive cigarette use 1 year later than dual users with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People's perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, compared with cigarettes, may influence their product use decisions. We tested if perceiving e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes predicted whether cigarette and e-cigarette dual users switched their product use status 1 year later, becoming exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, or non-users of both product types. DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of waves 2 (2014-15) and 3 (2015-16) of the prospective, national Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who reported using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 2 reported their perceptions of e-cigarette harm at wave 2, and reported whether they used cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 3 (n = 2211). MEASUREMENTS: The key predictor was wave 2 perceptions of e-cigarette harm compared with cigarettes ('less harmful,' 'about the same', 'more harmful' or 'don't know'). The key outcome was wave 3 past 30-day use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, classified into four categories: exclusive e-cigarette use (i.e. use of e-cigarettes but not cigarettes), exclusive cigarette smoking (i.e. use of cigarettes but not e-cigarettes), dual use of both product types and non-use of both product types. FINDINGS: At wave 2, 59.4% of dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes [95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.9, 61.9]. Compared with those with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users 1 year later [7.5 versus 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.7-4.8], more likely to remain dual users (39.6 versus 29.9%; aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8), less likely to become exclusive cigarette smokers (44.8 versus 59.4%; aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.7) and similarly likely to become non-users of both product types (8.2 versus 8.0%; aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: US adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes who perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes appear to be more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use, more likely to remain dual users and less likely to switch to exclusive cigarette use 1 year later than dual users with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Terry Gordon; Emma Karey; Meghan E Rebuli; Yael-Natalie H Escobar; Ilona Jaspers; Lung Chi Chen Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 16.459
Authors: Victor Martinez-Loredo; Alba González-Roz; Lynne Dawkins; Desmond Singh; James G Murphy; James MacKillop Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Tara Elton-Marshall; Pete Driezen; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Alexander Persoskie; Olivia Wackowski; Kelvin Choi; Annette Kaufman; David Strong; Shannon Gravely; Kristie Taylor; Jonathan Kwan; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Mark Travers; Andrew Hyland Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Patricia A Cioe; Alana N Mercurio; William Lechner; Catherine C Costantino; Jennifer W Tidey; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher W Kahler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong; Edward Sutanto; Ruth Loewen; Janine Ouimet; Steve S Xu; Anne C K Quah; Mary E Thompson; Christian Boudreau; Grace Li; Maciej L Goniewicz; Itsuro Yoshimi; Yumiko Mochizuki; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; Takahiro Tabuchi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shannon Gravely; Pete Driezen; Christina N Kyriakos; Mary E Thompson; James Balmford; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Ute Mons; Yannis Tountas; Kinga Janik-Koncewicz; Witold Zatoński; Antigona C Trofor; Constantine I Vardavas; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367