Literature DB >> 31278802

Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users.

Alexander Persoskie1, Erin Keely O'Brien1, Karl Poonai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People's perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, compared with cigarettes, may influence their product use decisions. We tested if perceiving e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes predicted whether cigarette and e-cigarette dual users switched their product use status 1 year later, becoming exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, or non-users of both product types.
DESIGN: Longitudinal analyses of waves 2 (2014-15) and 3 (2015-16) of the prospective, national Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who reported using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 2 reported their perceptions of e-cigarette harm at wave 2, and reported whether they used cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 3 (n = 2211). MEASUREMENTS: The key predictor was wave 2 perceptions of e-cigarette harm compared with cigarettes ('less harmful,' 'about the same', 'more harmful' or 'don't know'). The key outcome was wave 3 past 30-day use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, classified into four categories: exclusive e-cigarette use (i.e. use of e-cigarettes but not cigarettes), exclusive cigarette smoking (i.e. use of cigarettes but not e-cigarettes), dual use of both product types and non-use of both product types.
FINDINGS: At wave 2, 59.4% of dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes [95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.9, 61.9]. Compared with those with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users 1 year later [7.5 versus 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.7-4.8], more likely to remain dual users (39.6 versus 29.9%; aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8), less likely to become exclusive cigarette smokers (44.8 versus 59.4%; aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.7) and similarly likely to become non-users of both product types (8.2 versus 8.0%; aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7).
CONCLUSIONS: US adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes who perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes appear to be more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use, more likely to remain dual users and less likely to switch to exclusive cigarette use 1 year later than dual users with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-cigarette; ENDS; harm perception; perceived relative harm; product substitution; product use transitions; product-switching

Year:  2019        PMID: 31278802     DOI: 10.1111/add.14730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  15 in total

Review 1.  E-Cigarette Toxicology.

Authors:  Terry Gordon; Emma Karey; Meghan E Rebuli; Yael-Natalie H Escobar; Ilona Jaspers; Lung Chi Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 16.459

2.  Perceived harm of heated tobacco products, e-cigarettes, and nicotine replacement therapy compared with conventional cigarettes among ever and current heated tobacco users.

Authors:  Melinda Pénzes; Tamás Joó; Róbert Urbán
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Is E-cigarette Use Associated With Persistence or Discontinuation of Combustible Cigarettes? A 24-Month Longitudinal Investigation in Young Adult Binge Drinkers.

Authors:  Victor Martinez-Loredo; Alba González-Roz; Lynne Dawkins; Desmond Singh; James G Murphy; James MacKillop
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.825

Review 4.  Multiple Tobacco Product Use Conceptual Framework: A 2021 Update on Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Rubenstein; Lauren R Pacek; F Joseph McClernon
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.825

5.  Adult perceptions of the relative harm of tobacco products and subsequent tobacco product use: Longitudinal findings from waves 1 and 2 of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study.

Authors:  Tara Elton-Marshall; Pete Driezen; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Alexander Persoskie; Olivia Wackowski; Kelvin Choi; Annette Kaufman; David Strong; Shannon Gravely; Kristie Taylor; Jonathan Kwan; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Mark Travers; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) cue reactivity in dual users: A combined analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Emma I Brett; Ashley Vena; Krista Miloslavich; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.852

7.  Perceived Comparative Harm of Cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Amy L Nyman; Jidong Huang; Scott R Weaver; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01

8.  A pilot study to examine the acceptability and health effects of electronic cigarettes in HIV-positive smokers.

Authors:  Patricia A Cioe; Alana N Mercurio; William Lechner; Catherine C Costantino; Jennifer W Tidey; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.852

9.  Perceptions of Harmfulness of Heated Tobacco Products Compared to Combustible Cigarettes among Adult Smokers in Japan: Findings from the 2018 ITC Japan Survey.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong; Edward Sutanto; Ruth Loewen; Janine Ouimet; Steve S Xu; Anne C K Quah; Mary E Thompson; Christian Boudreau; Grace Li; Maciej L Goniewicz; Itsuro Yoshimi; Yumiko Mochizuki; Tara Elton-Marshall; James F Thrasher; Takahiro Tabuchi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  European adult smokers' perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes: cohort findings from the 2016 and 2018 EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Pete Driezen; Christina N Kyriakos; Mary E Thompson; James Balmford; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Ute Mons; Yannis Tountas; Kinga Janik-Koncewicz; Witold Zatoński; Antigona C Trofor; Constantine I Vardavas; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.