Literature DB >> 31742599

High-throughput phenotyping with deep learning gives insight into the genetic architecture of flowering time in wheat.

Xu Wang1, Hong Xuan2, Byron Evers1, Sandesh Shrestha1, Robert Pless2, Jesse Poland1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of plant traits with precision and speed on large populations has emerged as a critical bottleneck in connecting genotype to phenotype in genetics and breeding. This bottleneck limits advancements in understanding plant genomes and the development of improved, high-yielding crop varieties.
RESULTS: Here we demonstrate the application of deep learning on proximal imaging from a mobile field vehicle to directly estimate plant morphology and developmental stages in wheat under field conditions. We developed and trained a convolutional neural network with image datasets labeled from expert visual scores and used this "breeder-trained" network to classify wheat morphology and developmental stages. For both morphological (awned) and phenological (flowering time) traits, we demonstrate high heritability and very high accuracy against the "ground-truth" values from visual scoring. Using the traits predicted by the network, we tested genotype-to-phenotype association using the deep learning phenotypes and uncovered novel epistatic interactions for flowering time. Enabled by the time-series high-throughput phenotyping, we describe a new phenotype as the rate of flowering and show heritable genetic control for this trait.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a field-based high-throughput phenotyping approach using deep learning that can directly measure morphological and developmental phenotypes in genetic populations from field-based imaging. The deep learning approach presented here gives a conceptual advancement in high-throughput plant phenotyping because it can potentially estimate any trait in any plant species for which the combination of breeder scores and high-resolution images can be obtained, capturing the expert knowledge from breeders, geneticists, pathologists, and physiologists to train the networks.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  convolutional neural network; deep learning; genetic architecture; plant breeding; wheat

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742599      PMCID: PMC6862935          DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


  18 in total

1.  In the eye of the beholder: the effect of rater variability and different rating scales on QTL mapping.

Authors:  Jesse A Poland; Rebecca J Nelson
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Automated Identification of Northern Leaf Blight-Infected Maize Plants from Field Imagery Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Chad DeChant; Tyr Wiesner-Hanks; Siyuan Chen; Ethan L Stewart; Jason Yosinski; Michael A Gore; Rebecca J Nelson; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world.

Authors:  Mark Tester; Peter Langridge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Cole Trapnell; Mihai Pop; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach.

Authors:  Jesse A Poland; Patrick J Brown; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An explainable deep machine vision framework for plant stress phenotyping.

Authors:  Sambuddha Ghosal; David Blystone; Asheesh K Singh; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Arti Singh; Soumik Sarkar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Field-Based High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping Reveals the Temporal Patterns of Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Stress-Responsive Traits in Cotton.

Authors:  Duke Pauli; Pedro Andrade-Sanchez; A Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Elodie Gazave; Andrew N French; John Heun; Douglas J Hunsaker; Alexander E Lipka; Tim L Setter; Robert J Strand; Kelly R Thorp; Sam Wang; Jeffrey W White; Michael A Gore
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Deep machine learning provides state-of-the-art performance in image-based plant phenotyping.

Authors:  Michael P Pound; Jonathan A Atkinson; Alexandra J Townsend; Michael H Wilson; Marcus Griffiths; Aaron S Jackson; Adrian Bulat; Georgios Tzimiropoulos; Darren M Wells; Erik H Murchie; Tony P Pridmore; Andrew P French
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  Detection and analysis of wheat spikes using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Md Mehedi Hasan; Joshua P Chopin; Hamid Laga; Stanley J Miklavcic
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.993

View more
  12 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Image Analysis: Leaf Disease Segmentation.

Authors:  Monica F Danilevicz; Philipp Emanuel Bayer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Advanced high-throughput plant phenotyping techniques for genome-wide association studies: A review.

Authors:  Qinlin Xiao; Xiulin Bai; Chu Zhang; Yong He
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 3.  Advancements in Genomic and Behavioral Neuroscience Analysis for the Study of Normal and Pathological Brain Function.

Authors:  Annalisa M Baratta; Adam J Brandner; Sonja L Plasil; Rachel C Rice; Sean P Farris
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Bottlenecks and opportunities in field-based high-throughput phenotyping for heat and drought stress.

Authors:  Nathan T Hein; Ignacio A Ciampitti; S V Krishna Jagadish
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 5.  Conventional and Molecular Techniques from Simple Breeding to Speed Breeding in Crop Plants: Recent Advances and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Sunny Ahmar; Rafaqat Ali Gill; Ki-Hong Jung; Aroosha Faheem; Muhammad Uzair Qasim; Mustansar Mubeen; Weijun Zhou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.

Authors:  Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; José Alberto Barrón-López; Johannes W R Martini; Silvia Berenice Fajardo-Flores; Laura S Gaytan-Lugo; Pedro C Santana-Mancilla; José Crossa
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Deep Segmentation of Point Clouds of Wheat.

Authors:  Morteza Ghahremani; Kevin Williams; Fiona M K Corke; Bernard Tiddeman; Yonghuai Liu; John H Doonan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  DeepFlower: a deep learning-based approach to characterize flowering patterns of cotton plants in the field.

Authors:  Yu Jiang; Changying Li; Rui Xu; Shangpeng Sun; Jon S Robertson; Andrew H Paterson
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.993

Review 9.  Review: Application of Artificial Intelligence in Phenomics.

Authors:  Shona Nabwire; Hyun-Kwon Suh; Moon S Kim; Insuck Baek; Byoung-Kwan Cho
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Quantification of spatial metal accumulation patterns in Noccaea caerulescens by X-ray fluorescence image processing for genetic studies.

Authors:  Lucas van der Zee; Amelia Corzo Remigio; Lachlan W Casey; Imam Purwadi; Jitpanu Yamjabok; Antony van der Ent; Gert Kootstra; Mark G M Aarts
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.