Literature DB >> 31742431

Perspectives of Sickle Cell Disease Stakeholders on Heritable Genome Editing.

Brittany M Hollister1, Mariclare C Gatter1, Khadijah E Abdallah1, Alyssa J Armsby2,3, Ashley J Buscetta1, Yen Ji Julia Byeon1, Kayla E Cooper1, Stacy Desine1, Anitra Persaud1,4, Kelly E Ormond2,5, Vence L Bonham1.   

Abstract

Advances in CRISPR technology and the announcement of the first gene-edited babies have sparked a global dialogue about the future of heritable genome editing (HGE). There has been an international call for public input to inform a substantive debate about benefits and risks of HGE. This study investigates the views of the sickle cell disease (SCD) community. We utilized a mixed-methods approach to examine SCD stakeholders' views in the United States. We found SCD stakeholders hold a nuanced view of HGE. Assuming the technology is shown to be safe and effective, they are just as supportive of HGE as genetics professionals, but more supportive than the general public. However, they are also concerned about the potential implications of HGE, despite this support. As discourse surrounding HGE advances, it is crucial to engage disease communities and other key stakeholders whose lives could be altered by these interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742431      PMCID: PMC6919256          DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  20 in total

1.  Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training.

Authors:  Sara E Brownell; Jordan V Price; Lawrence Steinman
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2013-10-15

2.  Germline gene-editing research needs rules.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry.

Authors:  David Cyranoski; Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing.

Authors:  R Alta Charo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The Public and the Gene-Editing Revolution.

Authors:  Robert J Blendon; Mary T Gorski; John M Benson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Rethink public engagement for gene editing.

Authors:  Simon Burall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A Need for Better Understanding Is the Major Determinant for Public Perceptions of Human Gene Editing.

Authors:  Tristan McCaughey; David M Budden; Paul G Sanfilippo; George E C Gooden; Li Fan; Eva Fenwick; Gwyneth Rees; Casimir MacGregor; Lei Si; Christine Chen; Helena Hai Liang; Alice Pébay; Timothy Baldwin; Alex W Hewitt
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  What do we do now?: Responding to claims of germline gene editing in humans.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Yvonne Bombard; Rosario Isasi; Marsha Michie; Kiran Musunuru; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  "Am I my genes?": Questions of identity among individuals confronting genetic disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A CRISPR focus on attitudes and beliefs toward somatic genome editing from stakeholders within the sickle cell disease community.

Authors:  Anitra Persaud; Stacy Desine; Katherine Blizinsky; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Regulating reproductive genetic services: dealing with spiral-shaped processes and techno-scientific imaginaries.

Authors:  Ido Alon; Rosa Urbanos-Garrido; José Guimón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Complete Remission of Vocal Cord Cancer Treated With Low-Dose Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Combined With Interleukin-2 and Hyperthermia.

Authors:  Ralf Kleef; Viktor Bacher; Robert Nagy; Peter Reisegger; Tibor Bakacs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 3.  Harnessing the potential of CRISPR-based platforms to advance the field of hospital medicine.

Authors:  Matthew W McCarthy
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Decision-making about gene therapy in transfusion dependent thalassemia.

Authors:  Maa-Ohui Quarmyne; Diana Ross; Cynthia Sinha; Nitya Bakshi; Jeanne Boudreaux; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.567

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.