Literature DB >> 31742224

Tibial Tunnel Preparation in Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction. A Technical Tip to Lessen the Stress.

S M Javad Mortazavi1,2, Ahmad Ramezanpoor Asl1,2, Hamed Jafari1,2, Hojjat Asgari1,2, Mohamad H Kaseb1,2, Mohammad J Dehghanifiroozabadi1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce a technical tip for the preparation of tibial tunnel in a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction to reduce the chance of popliteal artery injury and duration of the surgery.
METHODS: This study included 18 patients who underwent PCL reconstructions at Imam Khomeini University Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between 2016 and 2017. In all patients, the PCL tibial aimer device was inserted from the anteromedial portal and its tip aimed 8-9 mm below shiny white fibers in PCL facet. Subsequently, the smooth guide pin was inserted from anteromedial tibial cortex and advanced just to the posterior cortex but not through it based on the measurement of tibial tunnel length. Thereafter, the reaming was done over the guide pin. As the pin was engaged in the posterior cortex, it was assured that it would not run before the reamer to the popliteal fossa. The pin was removed when the reamer touched the posterior cortex, and the reaming continued until reamer's head appeared in the PCL facet. Other steps of standard arthroscopic PCL reconstruction were done in this study. All patients were subjected to computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients and the mean duration of surgery were 25±3 years and 95 min, respectively. There was no vascular injury, and the position of the tibial tunnel in all cases was accurate. Moreover, the mean distance between the centers of the tibial tunnel to champagne-glass drop-off of the posterior cortex of tibia was obtained at 7.42 mm (range: 4.6-10.4 mm).
CONCLUSION: This study showed that avoiding the penetration of posterior cortex of the tibia by means of the pin during tibial tunnel preparation for PCL reconstruction is a safe, reproducible, and time-saving technique. This technique eliminates the need for fluoroscopy during the procedure. © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial injury; Neurovascular injury; Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Tibial tunnel

Year:  2019        PMID: 31742224      PMCID: PMC6802555     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  17 in total

1.  The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis.

Authors:  F G Girgis; J L Marshall; A Monajem
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Complications of posterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Sarah R Zawodny; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Anatomic localization of the popliteal artery at the level of the knee joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Selçuk Keser; Ahmet Savranlar; Ahmet Bayar; Suat Can Ulukent; Tülay Ozer; Ibrahim Tuncay
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods.

Authors:  Claude T Moorman; M Siobhan Murphy Zane; Sanjiv Bansai; Stephen J Cina; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Maria Kyriaki Kaseta
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 2: The posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Christopher M LaPrade; Sean D Smith; Matthew T Rasmussen; Mark G Hamming; Coen A Wijdicks; Lars Engebretsen; John A Feagin; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Adam M Johannsen; Colin J Anderson; Coen A Wijdicks; Lars Engebretsen; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring grafts-isokinetic assessment with control group.

Authors:  Tomasz Piontek; Kinga Ciemniewska-Gorzela; Andrzej Szulc; Jakub Naczk; Martyna Wardak; Tadeusz Trzaska; Witold Dudzinski; Monika Grygorowicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Popliteal artery injury during posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marcos Henrique Frauendorf Cenni; Bruno Fajardo do Nascimento; Guilherme Galvão Barreto Carneiro; Rodrigo Cristiano de Andrade; Lúcio Flávio Biondi Pinheiro Júnior; Oscar Pinheiro Nicolai
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-04-23

9.  Magnetic resonance study on the anatomical relationship between the posterior proximal region of the tibia and the popliteal artery.

Authors:  Rogério Franco de Araujo Goes; Augusto Cardoso Filho; Gabriel Novaes Pillar de Oliveira Castro; Fabricio Bolpato Loures; Idemar Monteiro Da Palma; André Kinder; Pedro José Labronici
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-07-30

10.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Retrograde Femoral Technique, Posterior Trans-septal Portal and Full Tibial Tunnel.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Young Jun Choi; Yong In
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.