Literature DB >> 26417569

Magnetic resonance study on the anatomical relationship between the posterior proximal region of the tibia and the popliteal artery.

Rogério Franco de Araujo Goes1, Augusto Cardoso Filho1, Gabriel Novaes Pillar de Oliveira Castro1, Fabricio Bolpato Loures1, Idemar Monteiro Da Palma2, André Kinder3, Pedro José Labronici1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and describe the distance from the popliteal artery to three specific areas of the proximal region of the tibia, with the knee extended, by means of magnetic resonance.
METHODS: Images of 100 knees of patients who underwent magnetic resonance examinations were analyzed. The location of the popliteal artery was measured in three different areas of the posterior proximal region of the tibia. The first measurement was made at the level of the knee joint (tibial plateau). The second was 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau. The third was at the level of the anterior tuberosity of the tibia (ATT).
RESULTS: The distances between the popliteal artery and the tibial plateau and ATT region were significantly greater in males than in females. The distances between the popliteal artery and the regions 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and the ATT were significantly greater in the age group over 36 years than in the group ≤36 years.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the anatomical position of the popliteal artery, as demonstrated through magnetic resonance studies, is of great relevance in planning surgical procedures that involve the knee joint. In this manner, devastating iatrogenic injuries can be avoided, particularly in regions that are proximal to the tibial plateau and in young patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Knee; Magnetic resonance; Popliteal artery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417569      PMCID: PMC4563072          DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


Introduction

Posterior neurovascular structures of the proximal region of the tibia can be injured during surgical procedures. The chances that iatrogenic injuries to the popliteal artery might occur, with formation of pseudoaneurysm, may be up to around 37.5%. Vascular complications have been reported in procedures such as arthroscopic surgery, upper tibial osteotomy, osteotomy at the level of the anterior tuberosity of the tibia (ATT) and fixation of fractures of the tibial plateau.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Although rare, vascular injury is one of the complications that may compromise the results from total knee arthroplasty (TKA).7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Its incidence is approximately 0.2%.19, 20, 21 The risk of vascular injury is greater among patients with previous vascular insufficiency.22, 23, 24, 25 Direct laceration of the artery during TKA is also rare.12, 18, 26 This injury has also been described during reconstruction of anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and also during meniscectomy through arthroscopy. In normal anatomical situations, the popliteal artery is located laterally to the intercondylar fossa and passes obliquely along the medial border of the popliteal muscle, where it divides in to the anterior and posterior tibial arteries.6, 21, 22 The inferior lateral genicular artery originates 1–2 cm below the joint line and circles the tibia deeply. The inferior medial genicular artery originates posteriorly between the soleus muscle and the lateral head of the gastrocnemius. Several authors have identified the location of the popliteal artery in knees with osteoarthrosis or in the knees of cadavers, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), arteriography or ultrasonography.23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 The objective of the present study was to analyze the distance to the popliteal artery with the knee extended, in three specific areas of the proximal region of the tibia, by means of MRI, and to compare the results between patients over and under 36 years of age.

Materials and methods

Between May and August 2012, the positioning of the popliteal artery in 100 knees of patients undergoing MRI examinations was retrospectively analyzed. All the images were obtained with the knee completely extended. The images were chosen by excluding patients who presented histories of fractures, tumors or deformities of the knee, or previous surgical procedures. Patients whose MRI presented any soft-tissue or bone abnormalities in the proximal region of the tibia were also excluded. The MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T machine (Magneton Essenza®, Siemens, Germany), with the patient in dorsal decubitus and the knee joint completely extended. The following sequences were obtained: T1-weighted sagittal sequence with repetition time (RT) of 540 ms, echo time (ET) of 13 ms, thickness of 4 mm, field of view (FOV) of 160/160 mm and matrix of 230/7384; and proton density-weighted with fat suppression in the axial plane (RT 3920, ET 35, thickness 3 mm, FOV 160/160 and matrix 192/320), sagittal plane (RT 2800, ET 35, thickness 4, FOV 160/160 and matrix 230/320) and coronal plane (RT 2550, ET: 32, thickness 3.5, FOV 160/160 and matrix 224/320). The distance from the popliteal artery to the posterior tibial cortex was measured and processed in a Leonardo Siemens workstation in three different areas of the proximal region of the tibia. The first measurement was made at the level of the knee joint, where injuries can occur, especially due to arthroscopic procedures. The second was made 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau, at the location where the cut is made during TKA. The third was made at the level of the anterior tuberosity of the tibia (ATT), where proximal osteotomy of the tibia is performed. The measurements were obtained by means of MRI, on TI sagittal slices with the knee completely extended. At all levels, the posterior cortex of the proximal region of the tibia and the anterior wall of the popliteal artery were used as references (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Location of the distance measurements between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex, at the level of the ATT and at 9 mm from the joint on the tibial plateau.

Characterization of the sample

Table 1 presents a descriptive analysis on the study sample of 100 knees, regarding the distances (in mm) in the three regions, which were defined thus: the tibial plateau at the level of the joint interline; 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau; and at the level of the ATT.
Table 1

Description of the distances in the three regions, in the sample of 100 knees.

RegionMeanSDMedianMinimumMaximum
Tibial plateau (mm)9.543.608.902.2817.47
9 mm distally (mm)6.592.466.193.0012.70
ATT (mm)12.972.7413.037.6119.31

SD, standard deviation.

Statistical analysis

The descriptive analysis presented the observed data in the form of tables, expressed using means, standard deviations and medians, along with illustrative graphs. The inferential analysis was composed of the following methods: Numerical variables were compared between pairs of subgroups using the Mann–Whitney test; and Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) was used to measure the degree of association between the distance measurements analyzed, i.e. between pairs of numerical variables. It can range from −1 to 1. The closer it is to 1 or −1, the stronger the association is; and the closer it is to zero, the weaker the relationship between the two variables is. Non-parametric methods were used, because the variables did not present normal (Gaussian) distribution, given the wide dispersion of the data and rejection of the hypothesis of normality according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The criterion used for determining significance was the level of 5%. The statistical analysis was processed using the SAS 6.11 computer software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The first objective was to ascertain whether there were any significant differences in the distances between the popliteal artery and the three regions (tibial plateau, 9 m distally to the tibial plateau and ATT) in the study sample of 100 knees, with regard to sex and age group. Table 2, Table 3 present the mean, standard deviation (SD) and median of the distances to the three regions, according to sex and age group (≤36 years and >36 years), respectively, and the corresponding descriptive levels from the Mann–Whitney test.
Table 2

Analysis on the distances from the three regions according to sex.

VariableMale (n = 56)
Female (n = 44)
p valuea
Mean ± SDMedianMean ± SDMedian
DistanceAge (years)37.3 ± 15.23444.0 ± 19.2430.078
Tibial plateau (mm)10.1 ± 3.510.18.8 ± 3.68.10.037
9 mm distally (mm)6.7 ± 2.46.56.4 ± 2.55.80.46
ATT (mm)13.5 ± 2.513.712.3 ± 2.912.50.016

SD, standard deviation.

Mann–Whitney test.

Table 3

Analysis on the distances from the three regions according to age group.

Variable≤36 years (n = 47)
>36 years (n = 53)
p valuea
Mean ± SDMedianMean ± SDMedian
Distance
Tibial plateau (mm)9.0 ± 3.68.610.1 ± 3.69.00.14
9 mm distally (mm)5.9 ± 2.25.67.2 ± 2.56.80.006
ATT (mm)12.1 ± 2.612.413.8 ± 2.613.30.005

SD, standard deviation.

Mann–Whitney test.

It was observed that the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex at the level of the tibial plateau (p = 0.037) and at the level of the ATT (p = 0.016) was significantly greater among males than among females. There was no significant difference (at the 5% level) in that distance, in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau (p = 0.46) between the sexes. It was demonstrated that the distances between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau (p = 0.006) and at the ATT level (p = 0.005) were significantly greater in the age group over 36 years than in the group ≤36 years. There was no significant difference (at the 5% level) in the distance in the region of the tibial plateau (p = 0.14) between the age groups. The second objective was to ascertain whether there was any correlation between age and the distances in the three regions (tibial plateau, 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and ATT) and between the three distances, in the sample of 100 knees (Table 4).
Table 4

Correlation between the distances from the three regions.

Distance from the region
Tibial plateau9 mm distallyATT
Age (years)rs0.1510.2380.258
p0.130.0170.010
9 mm distally (cm)rs0.770
p0.0001
ATT (cm)rs0.3650.523
p0.00020.0001

r, Spearman correlation coefficient; p, descriptive level.

The following was observed: The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau presented a significant direct correlation with age, in years (r = 0.238; p = 0.017), although this correlation was of low strength; The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region of the ATT presented a significant direct correlation with age, in years (r = 0.258; p = 0.017), although this correlation too was of low strength; and The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region of the tibial plateau did not present any significant correlation at the 5% level with age in years (p = 0.13). Fig. 2, Fig. 3 illustrate the correlation of age with the distances between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the regions 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and at the level of the ATT, respectively.
Fig. 2

Age dispersion according to distance from the popliteal artery to the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau.

Fig. 3

Age dispersion according to distance from the popliteal artery to the posterior tibial cortex in the ATT region.

The following was observed: The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau presented a significant direct correlation (r = 0.770; p = 0.0001); The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region of the tibial plateau presented a significant direct correlation with the ATT distance (r = 0.365; p = 0.0002), although this correlation too was of low strength; and The distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau presented a significant direct correlation with the distance in the ATT region (r = 0.523; p = 0.0001). Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 illustrate the correlations between the distance measurements in the regions studied.
Fig. 4

Dispersion of the distances between the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and the level of the tibial plateau.

Fig. 5

Dispersion of the distances between the distal region and the tibial plateau and ATT.

Fig. 6

Dispersion of the distances between the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and the region at the ATT level.

Discussion

The popliteal artery is the most anterior structure of the neurovascular bundle of the posterior region of the knee. It is a fixed structure and is closest to the joint in the region of the insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament, near to the fibrous arcade of the soleus muscle. In surgery involving the proximal region of the tibia, iatrogenic injuries to the posterior neurovascular structures are devastating and may put the limb at risk. This danger zone is located slightly laterally to the intercondylar fossa. Small reported on 12 cases of vascular injuries, which represented 0.54% of all complications in the case series. There were nine cases of direct trauma to the popliteal artery, one of displacement of the fibrous arcade and two of nonspecific injuries. Tawes et al. reported on three cases in which the popliteal artery was injured during arthroscopic meniscectomy but this was diagnosed only later on, which led to amputation. More than 50% of the patients with injuries to the popliteal artery present deficient circulation, despite presenting a palpable distal pulse. Yang et al. studied the neurovascular structures in the proximal region of the tibia. They found that the artery was lateral to the midline of the tibia, especially in female patients. There was a great difference in distance between the neurovascular structures and the posterior cortex of the tibia. This means that greater care should be taken when surgery requires access to the posterior cortex. This difference in distance was similar to what was reported by Zaidi et al. at the level of the joint line, but slightly smaller than the distance reported by Smith et al. at the level of the tibial cut for total knee arthroplasty. Our study demonstrated that in the general sample, the distances to the popliteal artery in the three regions studied (tibial plateau, which corresponds to arthroscopic surgery; 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau, which corresponds to the tibial cut for total knee arthroplasty; and at the level of the ATT, which corresponds to proximal osteotomy of the tibia) was 9.54 mm (SD: 3.60), 6.59 mm (SD: 2.46) and 12.97 mm (SD: 2.74), respectively. Comparison according to sex showed that in the male patients, the distances between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the regions of the distal plateau and the ATT were greater than those in the female patients. This means that even greater care needs to be taken when procedures are performed on female patients. Pace and Wahl analyzed knees from cadavers in order to study the posterior region of the knee and observed that the mean age of the specimens studied was 70 years. However, they reported that they did not know how this might change the anatomical relationships, in comparison with young individuals. Our study correlated the distances between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in three anatomical regions of the knee joint with the patients’ ages. Using a cutoff line of 36 years, the distances between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the regions 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau and at the level of the ATT showed that the greater the patient's age was, the greater this distance was r = 0.258; p = 0.017; and r = 0.238; p = 0.017, respectively. Several studies have reported occurrences of iatrogenic neurovascular injuries in the popliteal fossa during arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), which may have been caused by a guidewire or by a drill bit.35, 36 Matava et al. analyzed 14 knees from cadavers and showed that the popliteal artery was located posteriorly and laterally to the insertion of the PCL and anteriorly to the popliteal vein and sciatic nerve, in all the knees when extended (0° or 180°) and when flexed at 45°, 60° and 90°. Keser et al. reported that at the level of the knee joint, the popliteal artery was located posteriorly to the insertion of the PCL in 19 cases (5.7%). This location may cause injury to the popliteal artery in cases of repair to or excision of the posterior cornu of the lateral meniscus, and also in procedures for PCL reconstruction. Ahn et al. performed arthroscopic PCL reconstruction with slight release of the posterior capsule at the level of its insertion. Using angiography, they measured the distance between the tibial insertion of the PCL and the popliteal artery before and after capsule release. They found that the distance from the midpoint of the PCL to the popliteal artery became significantly greater after capsule release: from 4.4 ± 3.2 mm to 14.7 ± 4.1 mm. Cosgarea et al. analyzed knees from cadavers and observed that the mean distance from the midpoint of the PCL to the popliteal artery was 29.1 ± 11 mm (range from 18 to 55 mm). Pace and Wahl found that the mean distance from the PCL to the popliteal artery was 19 mm, with the knee flexed at 90° at the level of the joint line. In the present study, the means obtained from MRI showed that at the level of the knee joint, the mean distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex was 9.54 mm (range from 2.80 to 17.47 mm). It was also observed that in relation to sex, this distance at the level of the tibial plateau was significantly greater among males than among females (10.1 ± 3.5 mm and 8.8 ± 3.6 mm, respectively). The incidence of vascular injury after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is fortunately minimal (estimated at around 0.2%).9, 40 In the present study, the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex was analyzed in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau, which is the location where, on average, the cut for placement of the tibial component is made in TKA procedures. Ninomiya et al. conducted a study on cadavers by means of MRI, in order to investigate the mechanism for popliteal artery injury during TKA, and observed that this artery was located laterally to the tibial plateau in 95% of the specimens. Proximity to the posterior joint capsule makes the artery susceptible to injury during TKA. Takeda et al. emphasized the importance of greater case in positioning separators, with use of an oscillatory saw and osteotomes in the posterior region of the knee during TKA. They observed that along the arc of knee flexion, the positioning of the popliteal artery varied among individuals who had undergone TKA. Mureebe et al. reported two cases of patients who presented injuries to the popliteal artery after TKA and required artery reconstruction surgery to save the limb. Our study demonstrated through MRI that the mean distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau was 6.59 mm (range from 3 to 12.70). This was the location at which the artery was closest to the posterior tibial cortex. We did not find any significant difference between the sexes regarding the distances measured between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the three regions of the proximal tibia that were evaluated. However, in relation to age group, the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex in the region 9 mm distally to the tibial plateau was significantly greater in the age group over 36 years. This means that the greater the patient's age was (p = 0.006), the greater the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex (age ≤ 36 years, 5.9 ± 2.2 mm and >36 years, 7.2 ± 2.5 mm). Although rare, injury to the popliteal artery during proximal osteotomy of the tibia at the level of the anterior tuberosity may have devastating consequences. Osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity, which involves violation of the posterior tibial cortex using drill bits and screws, may give rise to injury to the popliteal artery. Only a few studies in the literature have demonstrated direct injury to the popliteal artery during proximal osteotomy of the tibia.6, 45 Zaidi et al. studied the positioning of the popliteal artery in 20 knees, by means of duplex ultrasonography at the level of the region in which the proximal osteotomy would be performed. In 12 knees (60%), the artery was located close to the tibia, with the knee flexed at 90°. Some studies have shown the presence of pseudoaneurysm subsequent to proximal tibial isteotomy.46, 47 Kim et al. reported that the popliteal artery became separated from the posterior tibial cortex when the knee was flexed at 90°. However, when the angle of the osteotomy cut was greater than 30°, in the coronal plane, it was seen that there could be a risk of injury to neurovascular structures. Smith et al. studied nine volunteers by means of MRI, with the knee completely extended and flexed at 90°, and demonstrated that even with the knee flexed at 90°, this did not mean that the popliteal vessels were safe during the surgical procedure. Our study using MRI showed that at the level of the ATT, the mean distance was 12.97 mm and the range was from 7.61 mm to 19.31 mm. This was the location at which the artery was found to be furthest from the posterior tibial cortex. It was also observed that among males, the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex at the level of the ATT was significantly greater (13.5 ± 2.5 mm and 12.3 ± 2.9 mm, respectively). In relation to age group, the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex at the level of the ATT was significantly greater in patients over the age of 36 years. This means that the greater the age was, the more distant from the posterior tibial cortex the popliteal artery was located. The greatest limitation of our study was that the measurements on the three regions of the knee were only ascertained with the knee extended. There is major controversy in the literature regarding the extent to which knee flexion may increase the distance between the popliteal neurovascular structures and the posterior tibial cortex. Some authors have argued that in all regions of the knee, the distance between the popliteal artery and the posterior tibial cortex would increase with the knee flexed. However, other authors have maintained that even with the knee flexed, there would not be any changed in the distance in the region 9 mm from the tibial plateau (TKA level) or at the level of valgus osteotomy of the tibia.6, 26, 28, 30

Conclusion

Knowledge of the anatomical position of the popliteal artery, as demonstrated through MRI, is of great relevance in planning surgical procedures that involve the knee joint. Through this, devastating iatrogenic injuries can be avoided. Thus, procedures closer to the tibial plateau become more dangerous, particularly in young patients.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  43 in total

1.  Injury to the popliteal artery and its anatomic location in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J T Ninomiya; J C Dean; V M Goldberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Proximity of the popliteal artery to the PCL during simulated knee arthroscopy: implications for establishing the posterior trans-septal portal.

Authors:  Andrew J Cosgarea; Dennis E Kramer; Michael S Bahk; William G Totty; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Popliteal vessels in knee surgery. A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  P N Smith; J Gelinas; K Kennedy; L Thain; C H Rorabeck; R B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Complications in arthroscopy: the knee and other joints. Committee on Complications of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Danger to the popliteal artery in high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  S H Zaidi; A G Cobb; G Bentley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05

6.  Mechanisms of arterial injuries associated with total hip replacement.

Authors:  J C Aust; C E Bredenberg; D G Murray
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-03

7.  False aneurysm of the popliteal artery: a rare complication of total knee replacement.

Authors:  C D Karkos; G J Thomson; S P D'Souza; V Prasad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Popliteal artery injury complicating arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Authors:  D Potter; W Morris-Jones
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Increasing the distance between the posterior cruciate ligament and the popliteal neurovascular bundle by a limited posterior capsular release during arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric angiographic study.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Joon Ho Wang; Sang Hak Lee; Jae Chul Yoo; Woo Joo Jeon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The mechanisms of severe arterial injury in surgery of the hip joint.

Authors:  B Nachbur; R P Meyer; K Verkkala; R Zürcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tibial Tunnel Preparation in Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Reconstruction. A Technical Tip to Lessen the Stress.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Ahmad Ramezanpoor Asl; Hamed Jafari; Hojjat Asgari; Mohamad H Kaseb; Mohammad J Dehghanifiroozabadi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.