Literature DB >> 31741861

Comparison of contrast sensitivity based on the surgical results for intermittent exotropia.

Hae Rang Kim1, Soo Jung Lee1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare contrast sensitivity (CS) based on the surgical results for intermittent exotropia (IXT) and to examine the relationship between CS and photophobia.
METHODS: Medical records of the patients who underwent bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for IXT between 4 and 12 years old were reviewed retrospectively. They were categorized based on the surgical results; successful correction group (n=36) and overcorrection group (esotropia ≥10 PD at 3mo postoperatively, n=18). Using CGT-2000 test for CS was performed binocularly, and subjective reports of photophobia was investigated preoperatively and at 3mo postoperatively. Objective photophobia was defined as a significant decrease in CS in the presence of glare.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, there was no difference in CS between the groups. Postoperatively, under mesopic conditions, significant improvement of CS was observed at 6.3°, 4°, and 2.5° in the successful correction group and at 6.3° and 4° in the overcorrection group, regardless of glare. Under photopic conditions, at all visual angles except 0.64°, improvement in CS was noted in both groups while CS worsened significantly at 0.64° in the overcorrection group postoperatively. At all visual angles under photopic conditions postoperatively, regardless of glare, CS in the overcorrected group was significantly worse than that in the successful correction group, and CS was significantly decreased by addition of glare in both groups. All patients except one (96.4%) in the successful correction group and 8 patients (61.5%) in overcorrection group showed improvement of photophobia postoperatively, which correlated with CS under photopic conditions (P=0.001, 0.03).
CONCLUSION: After surgery for IXT, CS under photopic conditions improve at all visual angles except 0.64°, while CS is significantly worse in the overcorrection group postoperatively at 0.64°. Subjective photophobia have significant correlation with CS under photopic conditions, and may be used as an objective indicator of photophobia. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast sensitivity; intermittent exotropia; overcorrection; photophobia; success

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741861      PMCID: PMC6848877          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.11.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  19 in total

1.  Photophobia: mechanism and implications.

Authors:  J E LEBENSOHN
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  Fumiki Okamoto; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.

Authors:  Deirdre Townley; Caitriona Kirwan; Michael O'Keefe
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Effects of strabismus on responsivity, spatial resolution, and contrast sensitivity of cat lateral geniculate neurons.

Authors:  K R Jones; R E Kalil; P D Spear
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The relationship of age when motor alignment is achieved and the subsequent development of stereopsis in infantile esotropia.

Authors:  Eren Çerman; Muhsin Eraslan; Mehdi S Öğüt
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Symptoms in Children with Intermittent Exotropia and Their Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Laura Liebermann; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2016-11-11

7.  Outcome study of surgical alignment before six months of age for congenital esotropia.

Authors:  M R Ing
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Contrast Sensitivity after Pars Plana Vitrectomy: Comparison between Macula-On and Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Hajime Kawamura; Masato Fujikawa; Osamu Sawada; Tomoko Sawada; Yoshitsugu Saishin; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Contrast sensitivity in children with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. A study of the effect of treatment.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-02

10.  Comparing the Shape of Contrast Sensitivity Functions for Normal and Low Vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changes in contrast sensitivity after surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Young Hwan Bae; Dong Gyu Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Comparison of two different contrast sensitivity devices in young adults with normal visual acuity with or without refractive surgery.

Authors:  Hyunjean Jung; Sung Uk Han; Sangyeop Kim; Hyunmin Ahn; Ikhyun Jun; Hyung Keun Lee; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Factors Affecting Contrast Sensitivity in Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Ji Min Kwon; Soo Jung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.