| Literature DB >> 31741657 |
Yang Zhang1,2, Chaoyue Chen1,2, Zerong Tian1,2, Yangfan Cheng2, Jianguo Xu1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: To differentiate pituitary adenoma from Rathke cleft cyst in magnetic resonance (MR) scan by combing MR image features with texture features.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31741657 PMCID: PMC6854938 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6584636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Characteristics of patients and lesions.
| Characteristics | Pituitary adenoma ( | Rathke cleft cyst ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year), mean (range) | 48.57 (18∼73) | 45.19 (21∼68) |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 39 | 23 |
| Female | 44 | 27 |
| Tumor size (mm) | ||
| Mean ± SD | 25.72 ± 9.01 | 21.14 ± 7.91 |
| Range | 7∼50.5 | 8∼38.3 |
| Tumor location | ||
| Intrasellar | 26 | 15 |
| Intrasellar and suprasellar | 57 | 35 |
| Days between MRI and surgery (day), mean (range) | 13.87 (1∼101) | 15.02 (1∼68) |
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1Examples of pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst on the contrast-enhanced image and T2WI. (a) Typical pituitary adenoma. (b) Typical Rathke cleft cyst. (c) Atypical pituitary adenoma (cystic pituitary adenoma after necrosis). (d) Atypical Rathke cleft cyst.
Differences of qualitative MR image features between pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst in the training group.
| Qualitative MR image features | Pituitary adenoma, | Rathke cleft cyst, |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Flow voids | |||
| Presence | 3 (4) | 2 (5) | 0.866 |
| Absence | 65 (96) | 38 (95) | (Fisher's exact tests) |
| Signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced images | |||
| Hypointense or isointense | 3 (4) | 30 (75) |
|
| Hyperintense | 65 (96) | 10 (25) | (chi-square tests) |
| Heterogeneity on the contrast-enhanced images | |||
| Homogenous | 34 (50) | 25 (62.5) | 0.208 |
| Heterogeneous | 34 (50) | 15 (37.5) | (chi-square tests) |
| Signal intensity on T2WI | |||
| Hypointense or isointense | 35 (64) | 14 (40) | 0.028 |
| Hyperintense | 20 (36) | 21 (60) | (chi-square tests) |
| Heterogeneity on T2WI | |||
| Homogenous | 27 (49) | 20 (57) | 0.456 |
| Heterogeneous | 28 (51) | 15 (43) | (chi-square tests) |
MR, magnetic resonance; T2WI, T2-weighted image. Correction adjusted level of significance p=0.01.
Differences of texture features between pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst on the contrast-enhanced image and T2WI based on the Mann–Whitney U test.
| Texture feature, mean (range) | Contrast-enhanced image | T2WI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pituitary adenoma | Rathke cleft cyst |
| Pituitary adenoma | Rathke cleft cyst |
| |
| Histo | ||||||
| Energy | 0.05 (0.02∼0.14) | 0.07 (0.03∼0.13) |
| 0.05 (0.03∼0.13) | 0.05 (0.02∼0.14) | 0.263 |
| Entropy | 1.42 (1.00∼1.75) | 1.33 (1.07∼1.59) |
| 1.40 (1.11∼1.62) | 1.45 (1.07∼1.68) | 0.078 |
| Kurtosis | 4.93 (1.70∼41.27) | 8.82 (2.91∼21.31) |
| 6.07 (1.59∼28.98) | 5.40 (1.51∼20.23) | 0.599 |
| Skewness | 0.25 (−1.19∼4.67) | 1.25 (−1.72∼3.23) |
| 0.27 (−2.87∼3.34) | −0.43 (−3.37∼1.56) |
|
|
| ||||||
| GLCM | ||||||
| Correlation | 0.58 (0.27∼0.85) | 0.44 (0.09∼0.82) |
| 0.52 (0.11∼0.89) | 0.45 (−0.34∼0.86) | 0.173 |
| Contrast | 41.01 (6.64∼161.70) | 43.19 (4.54∼154.60) | 0.600 | 49.76 (11.81∼146.29) | 84.69 (9.40∼717.59) | 0.028 |
| Dissimilarity | 4.31 (1.66∼9.10) | 3.98 (1.39∼8.74) | 0.310 | 4.60 (2.25∼8.63) | 5.64 (1.852∼22.209) | 0.108 |
| Energy | 0.01 (0.00∼0.03) | 0.01 (0.00∼0.04) |
| 0.01 (0.00∼0.03) | 0.01 (0.00∼0.03) | 0.566 |
| Entropy | 2.60 (1.76∼3.08) | 2.34 (1.87∼2.85) |
| 2.60 (1.91∼3.00) | 2.52 (1.85∼2.98) | 0.579 |
| Homogeneity | 0.30 (0.21∼0.54) | 0.40 (0.25∼0.57) |
| 0.30 (0.22∼0.51) | 0.34 (0.16∼0.53) | 0.984 |
T2WI, T2-weighted image; Histo, histogram-based matrix; GLCM, grey-level co-occurrence matrix.
Figure 2Boxplot of nine significantly different texture features in discriminating pituitary adenoma from Rathke cleft cyst. (a)∼(h) Texture features from the contrast-enhanced image; (i) texture features from T2WI.
Binary logistic regression analysis on texture features.
| Texture features | OR | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced image | Histo | Skewness | 0.352 | 0.166∼0.748 |
|
| Kurtosis | 1.395 | 0.496∼3.922 | 0.528 | ||
| GLCM | Correlation | 2.734 | 1.391∼5.372 |
| |
| Dissimilarity | 1.643 | 0.79∼3.415 | 0.183 | ||
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Histo, histogram-based matrix; GLCM, grey-level co-occurrence matrix.
Figure 3ROC curves of two independent predictors from the contrast-enhanced image in discrimination between pituitary adenoma and Rathke cleft cyst.
The diagnostic ability of independent predictors in discriminating pituitary adenoma from Rathke cleft cyst in the training group.
| Texture features | AUC | Standard error | 95% CI | Cutoff point | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced image | ||||||
| Histo-Skewness | 0.80 | 0.056 | 0.707∼0.867 | 1.005 | 97.06 | 67.50 |
| GLCM-Correlation | 0.75 | 0.053 | 0.655∼0.827 | 0.450 | 85.29 | 58.97 |
Histo, histogram-based matrix; GLCM, grey-level co-occurrence matrix; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4Relationship between MR image feature (signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image) and texture features (Histo-Skewness and GLCM-Correlation from the contrast-enhanced image).
The results of the receiver operating characteristics curve for relationship between MR image feature (signal intensity on the contrast-enhanced image) and texture features from the contrast-enhanced image.
| Texture features |
| AUC | Standard error | 95% CI | Cutoff point | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced image | |||||||
| Histo-Skewness |
| 0.85 | 0.050 | 0.768∼0.911 | 1.005 | 93.33 | 72.73 |
| GLCM-Correlation |
| 0.74 | 0.059 | 0.649∼0.822 | 0.450 | 85.33 | 68.75 |
Histo, histogram-based matrix; GLCM, grey-level co-occurrence matrix; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.