Literature DB >> 31741255

Obstetric and perinatal complications associated with assisted reproductive treatment in Spain.

Ana Ballesta-Castillejos1, Juan Gomez-Salgado2,3, Julian Rodriguez-Almagro4, Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas5, Antonio Hernández-Martínez6,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although most newborns conceived through assisted reproductive treatments are healthy, there are concerns about the safety of reproductive techniques and their effect on foetal/maternal well-being.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the incidence of obstetric and perinatal complications in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatments in the Spanish Health System.
METHOD: This is a cross-sectional observational study aimed at women who have been mothers between 2013 and 2018 in Spain. The data was collected through an online survey of 42 items that was distributed through lactation associations and postpartum support groups. In the data analysis, crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated, through a multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Five thousand nine hundred forty-two women participated, 2.3% (139) through artificial insemination and 8.2% (486) through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) techniques. Women who underwent IVF had a higher likelihood of suffering problems during pregnancy (OR = 1.71; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 1.37-2.13), delivery (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02), and postpartum (OR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.40-2.69) than women with spontaneous pregnancy. No increased likelihood of neonatal problems was observed in this group except for twin pregnancy (OR = 9.17; 95% CI, 6.02-13.96) and prematurity (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02). No differences were observed between spontaneous pregnancies and those achieved by artificial insemination.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies achieved through IVF present a higher risk of complications before, during and after delivery. However, there is no increased risk of neonatal problems except for a higher likelihood of twin pregnancy and prematurity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertilization in vitro; Morbidity; Obstetric labour complications; Patient safety; Quality of health care; Reproductive techniques assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741255      PMCID: PMC6911128          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01631-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  24 in total

1.  Dilemma of increased obstetric risk in pregnancies following IVF-ET.

Authors:  J Zádori; Z Kozinszky; H Orvos; M Katona; A Pál; L Kovács
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Perinatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand: single versus double embryo transfer.

Authors:  Yueping A Wang; Elizabeth A Sullivan; David L Healy; Deborah A Black
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia.

Authors:  Xi-Kuan Chen; Shi Wu Wen; Jim Bottomley; Graeme N Smith; Arthur Leader; Mark C Walker
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.108

4.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Authors:  Ch De Geyter; C Calhaz-Jorge; M S Kupka; C Wyns; E Mocanu; T Motrenko; G Scaravelli; J Smeenk; S Vidakovic; V Goossens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings.

Authors:  Jorien Seggers; Martina Pontesilli; Anita C J Ravelli; Rebecca C Painter; Mijna Hadders-Algra; Maas Jan Heineman; Sjoerd Repping; Ben Willem J Mol; Tessa J Roseboom; Sabine Ensing
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  P Cavoretto; M Candiani; V Giorgione; A Inversetti; M M Abu-Saba; F Tiberio; C Sigismondi; A Farina
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Jackson; Kimberly A Gibson; Yvonne W Wu; Mary S Croughan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Azam Kouhkan; Mohammad E Khamseh; Reihaneh Pirjani; Ashraf Moini; Arezoo Arabipoor; Saman Maroufizadeh; Roya Hosseini; Hamid Reza Baradaran
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Management of Endocrinopathies in Pregnancy: A Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Daniela Calina; Anca Oana Docea; Kirill Sergeyevich Golokhvast; Stavros Sifakis; Aristides Tsatsakis; Antonis Makrigiannakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Jin-Gai Zhu; Zhang-Bin Yu; Cheng-Yao Jiang; Shu-Ping Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.