Literature DB >> 3174037

Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy with alternative surgical techniques.

I L McAllister1, S M Meyers, H Zegarra, F A Gutman, Z N Zakov, G J Beck.   

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy, the authors conducted a retrospective study of 56 cases of uncomplicated retinal detachments (RDs) treated with this technique (follow-up, 6-18 months). These were compared with 28 similar cases treated with a Lincoff balloon and 78 similar cases treated with a scleral buckle. The long-term success rates for these three groups were 71, 64, and 96%, with the incidence of new breaks being 20, 18, and 1.3% respectively. In aphakic or pseudophakic patients with an absent or ruptured posterior capsule, the success rate for pneumatic retinopexy was only 43%. In phakic and aphakic patients with an intact posterior capsule, the success rate for pneumatic retinopexy improved to 81%. These data suggest that this technique is less effective in aphakic or pseudophakic patients with an absent or ruptured posterior capsule and that careful follow-up to detect new breaks is necessary in all cases. A prospective randomized study is needed to verify these data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3174037     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33079-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

Review 1.  View 3: The case for pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  E R Holz; W F Mieler
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  The complication of pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  G F Hilton; P E Tornambe; D A Brinton; T P Flood; S Green; W S Grizzard; M E Hammer; S R Leff; L Mascuilli; C M Morgan
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1990

3.  Perfluorocarbon gases in the suprachoroidal space of rabbit eyes.

Authors:  R N Mittl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  [Scleral buckling surgery and pneumatic retinopexy. Techniques, indications and results].

Authors:  H Hoerauf; H Heimann; L Hansen; H Laqua
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Management of persistent loculated subretinal fluid after pneumatic retinopexy.

Authors:  H Desatnik; A Alhalel; G Treister; J Moisseiev
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Pneumatic retinopexy: the evolution of case selection and surgical technique. A twelve-year study of 302 eyes.

Authors:  P E Tornambe
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

7.  Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Mulvihill; T Fulcher; V Datta; R Acheson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Pneumatic retinopexy with drainage of subretinal fluid.

Authors:  K Gündüz; I Günalp
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Anatomic, Visual, and Financial Outcomes for Traditional and Nontraditional Primary Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Jesse J Jung; John Cheng; Jane Y Pan; Daniel A Brinton; Quan V Hoang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY IN RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.

Authors:  R P Gupta; M Deshpande; A Bharadwaj; V K Baranwal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.