Literature DB >> 31738436

Factors Associated with Attrition of Adult Participants in a Longitudinal Database: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study.

Alyssa M Bamer1, Kara McMullen1, Nicole Gibran2, Radha Holavanahalli3, Jeffrey C Schneider4, Gretchen J Carrougher2, Shelley Wiechman2, Audrey Wolfe4, Dagmar Amtmann1.   

Abstract

Participant attrition in longitudinal studies can lead to substantial bias in study results, especially when attrition is nonrandom. A previous study of the Burn Model System (BMS) database prior to 2002 identified participant and study-related factors related to attrition. The purpose of the current study was to examine changes in attrition rates in the BMS longitudinal database since 2002 and to revisit factors associated with attrition. Individuals 18 years and older enrolled in the BMS database between 2002 and 2018 were included in this study. Stepwise logistic regression models identified factors significantly associated with attrition at 6, 12, and 24 months postburn injury. The percentage of individuals lost to follow-up was 26% at 6 months, 33% at 12 months, and 42% at 24 months. Factors associated with increased risk of loss to follow-up across two or more time points include male sex, lower TBSA burn size, being unemployed at the time of burn, shorter duration of acute hospital stay, younger age, not having private health insurance or workers' compensation, and a history of drug abuse. Retention levels in the BMS have improved by at least 10% at all time points since 2002. The BMS and other longitudinal burn research projects can use these results to identify individuals at high risk for attrition who may require additional retention efforts. Results also indicate potential sources of bias in research projects utilizing the BMS database. © American Burn Association 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31738436      PMCID: PMC9121819          DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.819


  21 in total

1.  The 2000 Clinical Research Award. Describing and predicting distress and satisfaction with life for burn survivors.

Authors:  D R Patterson; J T Ptacek; F Cromes; J A Fauerbach; L Engrav
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

2.  Biased estimation of the odds ratio in case-control studies due to the use of ad hoc methods of correcting for missing values for confounding variables.

Authors:  W Vach; M Blettner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.

Authors:  John W Graham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?

Authors:  Mary S Fewtrell; Kathy Kennedy; Atul Singhal; Richard M Martin; Andy Ness; Mijna Hadders-Algra; Berthold Koletzko; Alan Lucas
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Does problem behaviour affect attrition from a cohort study on adolescent mental health?

Authors:  Sari A Fröjd; Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino; Mauri J Marttunen
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).

Authors:  Femke Lamers; Adriaan W Hoogendoorn; Johannes H Smit; Richard van Dyck; Frans G Zitman; Willem A Nolen; Brenda W Penninx
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.735

7.  Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up.

Authors:  John D Corrigan; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; Jennifer Bogner; Marcel Dijkers; Melissa Sendroy Terrill; Gale Whiteneck
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies.

Authors:  Mark D Chatfield; Carol E Brayne; Fiona E Matthews
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Work status and attrition from longitudinal studies are influenced by psychiatric disorder.

Authors:  J A Fauerbach; J Lawrence; S Stevens; A Munster
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1998 May-Jun

Review 10.  Review of retention strategies in longitudinal studies and application to follow-up of ICU survivors.

Authors:  Catherine M Tansey; Andrea L Matté; Dale Needham; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  7 in total

1.  Correlates related to follow-up in a community engagement program in North Central Florida.

Authors:  Ayodeji Otufowora; Yiyang Liu; Deepthi S Varma; Catherine W Striley; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2020-09-19

2.  The relation between satisfaction with appearance and race and ethnicity: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research burn model system study.

Authors:  Felicia Mata-Greve; Shelley A Wiechman; Kara McMullen; Kimberly Roaten; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Early Laser for Burn Scars (ELABS): protocol for a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars with Pulsed Dye Laser and standard care compared to standard care alone [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

Authors:  Mark Brewin; Sharon Docherty; Vanessa Heaslip; Katie Breheny; Jonathon Pleat; Shelley Rhodes; Paul P M van Zuijlen; Mamta Shah
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2022-01-18

4.  Adolescents with and without head and neck burns: comparison of long-term outcomes in the burn model system national database.

Authors:  Benjamin B Wang; Khushbu F Patel; Audrey E Wolfe; Shelley Wiechman; Kara McMullen; Nicole S Gibran; Karen Kowalske; Walter J Meyer; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Burn model system national longitudinal database representativeness by race, ethnicity, gender, and age.

Authors:  Audrey E Wolfe; Olivia R Stockly; Cailin Abouzeid; Silvanys L Rodríguez-Mercedes; Laura E Flores; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran; Radha Holavanahalli; Kara McMullen; Nhi-Ha Trinh; Ross Zafonte; Julie K Silver; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.218

6.  Improving retention of community-recruited participants in HIV prevention research through Saturday household visits; findings from the HPTN 071 (PopART) study in South Africa.

Authors:  N F Bell-Mandla; R Sloot; G Maarman; S Griffith; A Moore; S Floyd; R Hayes; S Fidler; H Ayles; P Bock
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 7.  Psychological, functional and social outcomes in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors over time: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Natalie K Bradford; Fiona E J McDonald; Helen Bibby; Cindy Kok; Pandora Patterson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.955

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.