BACKGROUND: Although attrition is inevitable in longitudinal epidemiological studies, psychiatric studies are thought to be especially sensitive to attrition. This study aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition at 2-year follow-up in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to examine sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition and the influence of clinical psychiatric characteristics on attrition. In addition, differences in determinants between 3 types of attrition (refusal, noncontact, and not able to participate) were evaluated. RESULTS: The attrition rate at the 2-year follow-up assessment was 12.9% (385/2981), representing 6 deceased persons, 250 refusers, 51 noncontacts, and 78 persons unable to participate because of health reasons. Determinants of attrition were younger age, less years of education, not being of North European descent, being recruited in Amsterdam, no previous participation in research, and having major depressive disorder. Only the effects of age, sampling site, and previous participation in research differed between types of attrition. Furthermore, comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders and higher symptom severity were associated with attrition. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the view that psychiatric epidemiological research is more prone to high attrition rates, this study revealed a relatively low attrition rate. Furthermore, both sociodemographic and psychiatric variables were independent determinants of attrition. Oversampling of subgroups that are at higher risk of dropout may be advisable for future psychiatric cohort studies.
BACKGROUND: Although attrition is inevitable in longitudinal epidemiological studies, psychiatric studies are thought to be especially sensitive to attrition. This study aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition at 2-year follow-up in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. METHODS: Logistic regression was used to examine sociodemographic and psychiatric determinants of attrition and the influence of clinical psychiatric characteristics on attrition. In addition, differences in determinants between 3 types of attrition (refusal, noncontact, and not able to participate) were evaluated. RESULTS: The attrition rate at the 2-year follow-up assessment was 12.9% (385/2981), representing 6 deceased persons, 250 refusers, 51 noncontacts, and 78 persons unable to participate because of health reasons. Determinants of attrition were younger age, less years of education, not being of North European descent, being recruited in Amsterdam, no previous participation in research, and having major depressive disorder. Only the effects of age, sampling site, and previous participation in research differed between types of attrition. Furthermore, comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders and higher symptom severity were associated with attrition. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the view that psychiatric epidemiological research is more prone to high attrition rates, this study revealed a relatively low attrition rate. Furthermore, both sociodemographic and psychiatric variables were independent determinants of attrition. Oversampling of subgroups that are at higher risk of dropout may be advisable for future psychiatric cohort studies.
Authors: Nicole Vogelzangs; Aartjan T F Beekman; Arianne K B van Reedt Dortland; Robert A Schoevers; Erik J Giltay; Peter de Jonge; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Merijn Eikelenboom; Johannes H Smit; Aartjan T F Beekman; Ad J F M Kerkhof; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Jonathan P Stange; Lisanne M Jenkins; Katie L Bessette; Leah R Kling; John S Bark; Robert Shepard; Elissa J Hamlat; Sophie DelDonno; K Luan Phan; Alessandra M Passarotti; Olusola Ajilore; Scott A Langenecker Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2018-11
Authors: Kevin J Sullivan; Anran Liu; Hiroko H Dodge; Carmen Andreescu; Chung-Chou H Chang; Mary Ganguli Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 4.105