Literature DB >> 31737920

Correlation between cribriform/intraductal prostatic adenocarcinoma and percent Gleason pattern 4 to a 22-gene genomic classifier.

Alexander S Taylor1, Todd M Morgan2,3, David G Wallington4, Arul M Chinnaiyan1,2,3,5,6, Daniel E Spratt4,5, Rohit Mehra1,3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Decipher test measures expression of 22 RNA biomarkers associated with aggressive prostate cancer used to improve risk stratification of patients to help guide management. To date, Decipher's genomic classification has not been extensively correlated with specific histologic growth patterns in prostatic adenocarcinoma. With a growing understanding of the clinical aggressiveness associated with cribriform growth pattern (CF), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), and percent Gleason pattern 4 (G4%), we sought to determine if their presence was associated with an increased genomic risk as measured by the Decipher assay.
DESIGN: Clinical use of the Decipher assay was performed on the highest Gleason score (GS) tumor nodule of prostatectomy specimens from a prospective cohort of 48 patients, with GS varying from 7 through 9 to help guide clinical risk stratification. The tumors were reviewed for CF, IDC, and G4%, which were then compared to the Decipher score (0-1) and risk stratification (high vs not high).
RESULTS: The presence of CF/IDC was significantly associated with Decipher risk score (P = .007), with a high-risk Decipher score in 22% vs 56% of patients without or with CF/IDC. On binary logistic regression analysis, G4% (odds ratio [OR] 1.04 per percent increase [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06]; P = .0004) and CF predominant (OR, 9.60 [95%CI, 1.48-62.16]; P = .02) were significantly associated with a high-risk GC score. IDC did not reach significance (OR, 1.92 [95%CI, 0.65-5.67]; P = .24).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings add to an expanding knowledge base that supports G4% and CF/IDC as molecularly unique and clinically relevant features in prostatic adenocarcinoma. These histologic features should be standardly reported as they are associated with more aggressive prostate cancer. Future work should determine the independent information of these histologic findings that are relative to genomic assessment on long-term outcomes.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason pattern 4; cribriform; genomic; intraductal; metastasis; mortality; prostate cancer; risk stratification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737920      PMCID: PMC8208239          DOI: 10.1002/pros.23926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  17 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Novel Integrated Clinical-Genomic Risk Group Classification for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Jingbin Zhang; María Santiago-Jiménez; Robert T Dess; John W Davis; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Christopher J Kane; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova; Firas Abdollah; Ashley E Ross; Adam Cole; Edward Uchio; Josh M Randall; Hao Nguyen; Shuang G Zhao; Rohit Mehra; Andrew G Glass; Lucia L C Lam; Jijumon Chelliserry; Marguerite du Plessis; Voleak Choeurng; Maria Aranes; Tyler Kolisnik; Jennifer Margrave; Jason Alter; Jennifer Jordan; Christine Buerki; Kasra Yousefi; Zaid Haddad; Elai Davicioni; Edouard J Trabulsi; Stacy Loeb; Ashutosh Tewari; Peter R Carroll; Sheila Weinmann; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; R Jeffrey Karnes; Felix Y Feng; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.

Authors:  Adam I Cole; Todd M Morgan; Daniel E Spratt; Ganesh S Palapattu; Chang He; Scott A Tomlins; Alon Z Weizer; Felix Y Feng; Angela Wu; Javed Siddiqui; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi P Kunju; David C Miller; Brent K Hollenbeck; John T Wei; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Luca Incrocci; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Patient-specific Meta-analysis of 2 Clinical Validation Studies to Predict Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Using the 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Nan Zhang; Michael R Crager; Tara Maddala; Anne Dee; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Jeffry P Simko; Matthew R Cooperberg; Shiv Srivastava; Inger L Rosner; June M Chan; Phillip G Febbo; Peter R Carroll; Jennifer Cullen; H Jeffrey Lawrence
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the Performance of the Decipher Genomic Classifier in High-Risk Men After Prostatectomy to Predict Development of Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Kasra Yousefi; Samineh Deheshi; Ashley E Ross; Robert B Den; Edward M Schaeffer; Bruce J Trock; Jingbin Zhang; Andrew G Glass; Adam P Dicker; Firas Abdollah; Shuang G Zhao; Lucia L C Lam; Marguerite du Plessis; Voleak Choeurng; Zaid Haddad; Christine Buerki; Elai Davicioni; Sheila Weinmann; Stephen J Freedland; Eric A Klein; R Jeffrey Karnes; Felix Y Feng
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Eric J Bergstralh; Elai Davicioni; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Anirban P Mitra; Anamaria Crisan; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Lucia L Lam; Rachel Carlson; Darby J S Thompson; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Timothy J Triche; Thomas Kollmeyer; Karla V Ballman; Peter C Black; George G Klee; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fei Dong; Ping Yang; Chaofu Wang; Shulin Wu; Yu Xiao; W Scott McDougal; Robert H Young; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeffry P Simko; Janet E Cowan; Julia E Reid; Azita Djalilvand; Satish Bhatnagar; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Gregory P Swanson; Steven Stone; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bonnie Choy; Shane M Pearce; Blake B Anderson; Arieh L Shalhav; Gregory Zagaja; Scott E Eggener; Gladell P Paner
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients.

Authors:  R B Den; M Santiago-Jimenez; J Alter; M Schliekelman; J R Wagner; J F Renzulli Ii; D I Lee; C G Brito; K Monahan; B Gburek; N Kella; G Vallabhan; F Abdollah; E J Trabulsi; C D Lallas; L G Gomella; T L Woodlief; Z Haddad; L L C Lam; S Deheshi; Q Wang; V Choeurng; M du Plessis; J Jordan; B Parks; H Shin; C Buerki; K Yousefi; E Davicioni; V R Patel; N L Shah
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  10 in total

1.  The impact of multiparametric MRI features to identify the presence of prevalent cribriform pattern in the peripheral zone tumors.

Authors:  Caterina Gaudiano; Lorenzo Bianchi; Antonio De Cinque; Beniamino Corcioni; Francesca Giunchi; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Eugenio Brunocilla; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Oncological outcomes of cribriform histology pattern in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Ivan Russo; Timo Soeterik; Ignacio Puche-Sanz; Giuseppe Broggi; Arturo Lo Giudice; Cosimo De Nunzio; Riccardo Lombardo; Giancarlo Marra; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.455

3.  Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Y Greenland; Matthew R Cooperberg; Anthony C Wong; Emily Chan; Peter R Carroll; Jeffry P Simko; Bradley A Stohr
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-01

Review 4.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Esther I Verhoef; Eva Hollemans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  A distinct repertoire of cancer-associated fibroblasts is enriched in cribriform prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Brenda L Rios; Elysa M Wolf; Colby Tubbs; Hong Yuen Wong; Kerry R Schaffer; Tamara L Lotan; Giovanna A Giannico; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 7.  Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.

Authors:  Helen Pantazopoulos; Mame-Kany Diop; Andrée-Anne Grosset; Frédérique Rouleau-Gagné; Afnan Al-Saleh; Teodora Boblea; Dominique Trudel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth.

Authors:  Savannah R Duenweg; Xi Fang; Samuel A Bobholz; Allison K Lowman; Michael Brehler; Fitzgerald Kyereme; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Kenneth M Jacobsohn; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-03-02

9.  Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies.

Authors:  L Lucia Rijstenberg; Tim Hansum; Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.778

10.  Effect of core needle biopsy number on intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) diagnosis in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Kato; Akihiro Hirakawa; Yumiko Kobayashi; Akiyuki Yamamoto; Yushi Naito; Kosuke Tochigi; Tomoyasu Sano; Shohei Ishida; Yasuhito Funahashi; Takashi Fujita; Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Ryohei Hattori; Toyonori Tsuzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.402

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.