Literature DB >> 31737800

"Sclero-DALK": New approach for treatment of superficial corneal leukoma.

Laura Escudero Bodenlle1, Emeterio Orduña Domingo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Present a new technique to perform a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) that could be an alternative to the "Big Bubble" or the Melles technique. OBSERVATIONS: The case concerns a 48 years old man who presents superficial corneal leukoma in the left eye secondary to ocular trauma 14 years ago. Sclero-DALK is performed under general anesthesia obtaining an excellent visual and refractive result. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Sclero-DALK is a novelty in surgical treatment of corneal surface opacities. It offers the same advantages than conventional DALK since it is also a non-penetrating extraocular technique. Better final visual acuities are expected with this technique in comparision with PK and the conventional DALK because less residual stroma can be remained since we acces directly to the predescemetic space.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal leukoma; Corneal surgery; Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; Deep non-perforating sclerotomy; Penetrating keratoplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737800      PMCID: PMC6849143          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2019.100561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep        ISSN: 2451-9936


Introduction

Corneal scarring is a frequent cause of visual loss., It can be caused by different factors, such us dystrophies, infections, and ocular trauma. Traditionally, penetrating keratoplasty (PK) has been the procedure of choice in such cases of severe corneal scarring., However, in pathologies where there is no endothelial involvement, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) may be a better alternative., Postoperative complications including rejection and intraocular pressure elevation are more frequent in PK. DALK offers an alternative procedure that may lessen those risks because the recipient Descemet's membrane (DM) and endothelium are preserved. However, intraoperative perforation of the DM is a significant complication. At the same time, DALK carries the potential danger of decreased visual acuity due to possible opacification at the interface layers.9, 10, 11 We report a new approach for treatment of corneal leukoma which can decrease the risk of DM perforation and may report better postoperative visual acuity, since less residual estroma is remained.

Case presentation

The case concerns a 48 years old man referred to the Corneal Diseases Department for superficial corneal leukoma in the left eye (LE) secondary to ocular trauma 14 years ago. The initial clinical findings showed an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 1 in the right eye (RE) and 0,3 in the LE, with previous refraction of +0.75 (RE) and +2.50–2 x 10° (LE). In the slit lamp evaluation we objectify a central corneal leukoma with anterior stromal opacities and epithelial edema in temporal area, in his LE(Fig. 1). The RE showed no alterations.
Fig. 1

Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showing superficial corneal leukoma before surgery.

Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showing superficial corneal leukoma before surgery. Intraocular pressure and fundus were normal in both eyes. The patient complains of low vision in his LE. A deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with a scleral approach (Sclero-Dalk) is proposed and he accepted. Corneal thickness as measured by anterior segment optic coherence tomography (OCT) was 530 μm. Non-contact specular microscopy showed normal endothelial mosaic pattern and a cell density of 2473.4 cells/mm2 Sclero-DALK is performed under general anesthesia. It consists of the creation of a deep sclerotomy through which we directly approach the predescemetic space. Using a Mermoud spatula, we penetrate this space and introduce a cannula with viscoelastic, achieving dissection of the DM. Subsequently the same process is continued as for the realization of a conventional DALK. As a postoperative treatment, we used dexamethasone and tobramycin drops every 4 hours. The day after surgery, the corneal graft was transparent with a small air bubble in the anterior chamber; UCVA was 0.2 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

24 hours after Sclero-DALK surgery.

24 hours after Sclero-DALK surgery. One week after surgery VA had improved to 0.3. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showed diffuse edema in the temporal area of the cornea (Fig. 3). The anterior segment OCT revealed a small detachment of DM in the temporal periincisional zone (Fig. 4), so it was decided to introduce an air bubble in the anterior chamber, through a lower temporal paracentesis, obtaining the repositioning of the membrane. The patient was left in absolute rest in supine position for 2 hours and then, half of the air was removed. (Fig. 5, Fig. 6).
Fig. 3

One week after Sclero-DALK surgery.Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showing diffuse edema in the temporal area of the cornea.

Fig. 4

Anterior segment OCT of the left cornea. Descemet membrane detachment in the periincisional zone (left image) and Descemet membrane reposition after air injection (right image).

Fig. 5

Immediately after air injection.

Fig. 6

Two hours after air injection.

One week after Sclero-DALK surgery.Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showing diffuse edema in the temporal area of the cornea. Anterior segment OCT of the left cornea. Descemet membrane detachment in the periincisional zone (left image) and Descemet membrane reposition after air injection (right image). Immediately after air injection. Two hours after air injection. At 4 weeks postoperatively, corneal transparency was recovered. (Fig. 7). UCVA was 0.4. The treatment is modified to fluorometolone eye drops every 6 hours.
Fig. 7

Transparent corneal graft, one month after surgery.

Transparent corneal graft, one month after surgery. Three months after surgery, UCVA was 0.5. Keratometry in LE was 48.12/44.37 × 183°. Suture removal was initiated (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8

Transparent corneal graft, 3 months after Sclero-DALK surgery. The image on the right shows the scleral approach area.

Transparent corneal graft, 3 months after Sclero-DALK surgery. The image on the right shows the scleral approach area. At present, the patient does not refer any symptoms. His best corrected visual acuity (−1.50–4.50 × 50°) is 0.8 and he does not need any treatment. (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9

Slit lamp biomicroscopy and anterior segment OCT at 8 months after Sclero-DALK surgery).

Slit lamp biomicroscopy and anterior segment OCT at 8 months after Sclero-DALK surgery).

Discussion

The Sclero-Dalk technique come up in order to find an alternative to the “Big Bubble” technique for deep lamellar corneal transplants realization. It is performed under general anesthesia. We begin the surgery by performing a limbic peritomy and a 4 × 4mm deep sclerotomy wich allows us to get to the schlemm canal (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10

Creation of the deep sclerotomy.

Creation of the deep sclerotomy. A paracentesis is performed and the aqueous humor of the anterior chamber is evacuated. Once we visualize Schlemm canal, we are certain that we are in predescemetic space level which is further dissected by penetrating into the cornea with the Mermoud spatula. Sodium hyaluoronate can be injected through a flat cannula deep into the predescemetic space. Injection of the viscoelastic substance between the deep stroma and Descemet's membrane facilitates the separation of the layers (Fig. 11, Fig. 12).
Fig. 11

Viscodissection through the sclerotomy approach.

Fig. 12

Viscodissection through the sclerotomy approach.

Viscodissection through the sclerotomy approach. Viscodissection through the sclerotomy approach. The anterior corneal surface is cut with a suction trephine set and is completed with Vannas scissors. (Fig. 13, Fig. 14). The stromal lamella is removed and the DM is exposed.
Fig. 13

Cutting the anterior corneal surface.

Fig. 14

Cutting the anterior corneal surface.

Cutting the anterior corneal surface. Cutting the anterior corneal surface. The DM is irrigated until the viscoelastic is completely removed (Fig. 17). A descemet stripped donor corneal button (0.25 mm greater than the size of the corneal receptor trepanation performed) from a fresh cornea, is prepared by the surgeon (Fig. 15, Fig. 16), and subsequently placed at the predescemet's level of the recipient one and sutured to the host cornea by 16-interrupted 10–0 monofilament nylon sutures. (Fig. 18). Sclera and conjunctiva are sutured and cefuroxime intracamerular (0,1ml) is injected at the end of surgery.
Fig. 17

Irrigation to remove viscoelastic.

Fig. 15

Donor scleral corneal ring on the Hessburg-Barron Punch block (left image).

Fig. 16

Endothelium is removed with its Descemet Membrane by tweezers (right image).

Fig. 18

End of the surgery

Donor scleral corneal ring on the Hessburg-Barron Punch block (left image). Endothelium is removed with its Descemet Membrane by tweezers (right image). Irrigation to remove viscoelastic. End of the surgery The main advantage of this new surgical technique is that it allows us to approach the predescemetic space by direct vision from the Schlemm canal. The conventional DALK or the “Big Bubble” technique use a reflex produced by the air, which is not easily visible and therefore it is more difficult to confirm that there is no residual stromal. The main disadvantage is that future surgeries of glaucoma may be compromised. Some experience in glaucoma surgery, especially in the performance of deep non perforating sclerectomy is required. The dissection of DM is not difficult, except in cases with adhesions, as in previous hydrops or deep leukomas.

Conclusions

Sclero-DALK is a novelty in surgical treatment of corneal surface opacities. It offers the same advantages than conventional DALK since it is also a non-penetrating extraocular technique. Better final visual acuities are expected with this technique in comparision with PK and the conventional DALK because less residual stroma can be remained since we acces directly to the predescemetic space. More cases are required in order to standardize the technique and clearly establish its indications and limitations, since there are no publications on this new surgical approach.

Acknowledgements and disclosures

Patient consent

Written consent to publish this case has not been obtained. This report does not contain any personal identifying information.

Funding

No funding or grant support.

Authorship

All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship.

Declaration of competing interest

The following authors have no financial disclosures: LEB, EOD.
  10 in total

1.  Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts.

Authors:  Navid Ardjomand; Scott Hau; James C McAlister; Catey Bunce; David Galaretta; Stephen J Tuft; Daniel F P Larkin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  [DALK and penetrating laser keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus].

Authors:  B Seitz; C Cursiefen; M El-Husseiny; A Viestenz; A Langenbucher; N Szentmáry
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the american academy of ophthalmology.

Authors:  William J Reinhart; David C Musch; Deborah S Jacobs; W Barry Lee; Stephen C Kaufman; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  A quick surgical technique for deep, anterior lamellar keratoplasty using visco-dissection.

Authors:  G R Melles; L Remeijer; A J Geerards; W H Beekhuis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Massimo Busin; Jacqueline Beltz
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammed Anwar; Klaus D Teichmann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Corneal blindness: a global perspective.

Authors:  J P Whitcher; M Srinivasan; M P Upadhyay
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus.

Authors:  Miriam Keane; Douglas Coster; Mohammed Ziaei; Keryn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-22

9.  A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.

Authors:  Douglas J Coster; Marie T Lowe; Miriam C Keane; Keryn A Williams
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Authors:  Yueqin Chen; Dan-Ning Hu; Yuan Xia; Liping Yang; Chunyan Xue; Zhenping Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.