Literature DB >> 24491643

A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.

Douglas J Coster1, Marie T Lowe1, Miriam C Keane1, Keryn A Williams2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate changing patterns of practice of keratoplasty in Australia, graft survival, visual outcomes, the influence of experience, and the surgeon learning curve for endothelial keratoplasty.
DESIGN: Observational, prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: From a long-standing national corneal transplantation register, 13 920 penetrating keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar keratoplasties (DALKs), and 2287 endokeratoplasties performed between January 1996 and February 2013 were identified.
METHODS: Kaplan-Meier functions were used to assess graft survival and surgeon experience, the Pearson chi-square test was used to compare visual acuities, and linear regression was used to examine learning curves. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft survival.
RESULTS: The total number of corneal grafts performed annually is increasing steadily. More DALKs but fewer penetrating grafts are being performed for keratoconus, and more endokeratoplasties but fewer penetrating grafts are being performed for Fuchs' dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. In 2012, 1482 grafts were performed, compared with 955 in 2002, translating to a requirement for 264 extra corneal donors across the country in 2012. Comparing penetrating grafts and DALKs performed for keratoconus over the same era, both graft survival (P <0.001) and visual outcomes (P <0.001) were significantly better for penetrating grafts. Survival of endokeratoplasties performed for Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was poorer than survival of penetrating grafts for the same indications over the same era (P <0.001). Visual outcomes were significantly better for penetrating grafts than for endokeratoplasties performed for Fuchs' dystrophy (P <0.001), but endokeratoplasties achieved better visual outcomes than penetrating grafts for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (P <0.001). Experienced surgeons (>100 registered keratoplasties) achieved significantly better survival of endokeratoplasties (P <0.001) than surgeons who had performed fewer grafts (<100 registered keratoplasties). In the hands of experienced, high-volume surgeons, endokeratoplasty failures occurred even after 100 grafts had been performed.
CONCLUSIONS: More corneal transplants, especially DALKs and endokeratoplasties, are being performed in Australia than ever before. Survival of DALKs and endokeratoplasties is worse than the survival of penetrating grafts performed for the same indications over the same timeframe. Many endokeratoplasties fail early, but the evidence for a surgeon learning curve is unconvincing.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24491643     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  47 in total

1.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.

Authors:  S Heinzelmann; D Böhringer; P Eberwein; T Reinhard; P Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [The IRIS® Registry : Purpose and perspectives. German Version].

Authors:  D W Parke Ii; F Lum; W L Rich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Management of high-risk corneal transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Ahmad Kheirkhah; Tulio B Abud; Sunali Goyal; Reza Dana
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of cystoid macular edema post Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Koji Kitazawa; Kanae Kayukawa; Koichi Wakimasu; Tsutomu Inatomi; Osamu Hieda; Kazuhiko Mori; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Trends in Corneal Transplantation in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Daniel Sarezky; Stephen E Orlin; Wei Pan; Brian L VanderBeek
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Changing trends in corneal graft surgery: a ten-year review.

Authors:  Ugo de Sanctis; Camilla Alovisi; Luigi Bauchiero; Guido Caramello; Gianfranco Girotto; Claudio Panico; Luisa Vinai; Federico Genzano; Antonio Amoroso; Federico Grignolo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Pre-Descemets endothelial keratoplasty: the PDEK clamp for successful PDEK.

Authors:  H S Dua; D G Said
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Changing trends in corneal transplantation: a national review of current practices in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Katja C Iselin; Emily Greenan; Colin Hynes; Sandra Shaw; Tim Fulcher; William J Power; Barry Quill; Marc Guerin; Weng H Lee; Conor C Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Indications, surgical procedures and outcomes of keratoplasty at a Tertiary University-based hospital: a review of 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Eman M Al-Sharif; Majed Alkharashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  A 5-year analysis of endothelial vs penetrating keratoplasty graft survival in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Anita Lai Wah Li; Rachel Pui Wai Kwok; Ka Wai Kam; Alvin Lerrmann Young
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.