Literature DB >> 31737155

Electrostatic solvation and mobility in uniform and non-uniform electric fields: From simple ions to proteins.

Dmitry V Matyushov1.   

Abstract

A number of observations related to interfacial electrostatics of polar liquids question the traditional assumption of dielectric theories that bulk dielectric properties can be continuously extended to the dividing surface separating the solute from the solvent. The deficiency of this approximation can be remedied by introducing local interface susceptibilities and the interface dielectric constant. Asymmetries of ionic hydration thermodynamics and of the mobility between cations and anions can be related to different propensities of the water molecules to orient their dipole toward and outward from solutes of opposite charges. This electrostatic asymmetry is reflected in different interface dielectric constants for cations and anions. The interface of water with neutral solutes is spontaneously polarized due to preferential water orientations in the interface. This phenomenon is responsible for a nonzero cavity potential directly related to a nonzero surface charge. This connection predicts that particles allowing a nonzero cavity potential must show mobility in an external electric field even if the net charge of the particle is zero. The theory predicts that a positive cavity potential and a positive surface charge translate to an effectively negative solute charge reported by mobility measurements. Passing of the cavity potential through a minimum found in simulations might be the origin of the maximum of mobility vs the ionic size observed experimentally. Finally, mobility of proteins in the field gradient (dielectrophoresis) is many orders of magnitude greater than predicted by the traditionally used Clausius-Mossotti equation. Two reasons contribute to this disagreement: (i) a failure of Maxwell's electrostatics to describe the cavity-field susceptibility and (ii) the neglect of the protein permanent dipole by the Clausius-Mossotti equation. An analytical relation between the dielectrophoretic susceptibility and dielectric spectroscopy of solutions provides direct access to this parameter, confirming the failure of the Clausius-Mossotti equation in application to protein dielectrophresis.
Copyright © 2019 Author(s).

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737155      PMCID: PMC6837943          DOI: 10.1063/1.5124390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  46 in total

1.  Dielectric permittivity profiles of confined polar fluids.

Authors:  V Ballenegger; J-P Hansen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Solvent reaction field potential inside an uncharged globular protein: a bridge between implicit and explicit solvent models?

Authors:  David S Cerutti; Nathan A Baker; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  On the origin of the electrostatic potential difference at a liquid-vacuum interface.

Authors:  Edward Harder; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Interfacial water. The structure of interfacial water on gold electrodes studied by x-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Juan-Jesus Velasco-Velez; Cheng Hao Wu; Tod A Pascal; Liwen F Wan; Jinghua Guo; David Prendergast; Miquel Salmeron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Limitations of the Clausius-Mossotti function used in dielectrophoresis and electrical impedance studies of biomacromolecules.

Authors:  Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  The distribution of charged groups in proteins.

Authors:  D J Barlow; J M Thornton
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Terahertz absorption of lysozyme in solution.

Authors:  Daniel R Martin; Dmitry V Matyushov
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Calculation and measurement of the dipole moment of small proteins: use of protein data base.

Authors:  S Takashima; K Asami
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Central Role of Bicarbonate Anions in Charging Water/Hydrophobic Interfaces.

Authors:  Xibo Yan; Marco Delgado; Julien Aubry; Olivier Gribelin; Antonio Stocco; Fernande Boisson-Da Cruz; Julien Bernard; François Ganachaud
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.475

10.  Electrochemical Surface Potential Due to Classical Point Charge Models Drives Anion Adsorption to the Air-Water Interface.

Authors:  Marcel D Baer; Abraham C Stern; Yan Levin; Douglas J Tobias; Christopher J Mundy
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  Absolute ion hydration free energy scale and the surface potential of water via quantum simulation.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Thomas L Beck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Festschrift for Professor Hsueh-Chia Chang.

Authors:  Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Dielectrophoresis of proteins: experimental data and evolving theory.

Authors:  Mark A Hayes
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Microdroplets can act as electrochemical cells.

Authors:  Christian F Chamberlayne; Richard N Zare
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Protein Dielectrophoresis: I. Status of Experiments and an Empirical Theory.

Authors:  Ralph Hölzel; Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Can electric fields drive chemistry for an aqueous microdroplet?

Authors:  Hongxia Hao; Itai Leven; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Protein Dielectrophoresis: A Tale of Two Clausius-Mossottis-Or Something Else?

Authors:  Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.