Literature DB >> 31737123

Trimethylamine-N-oxide as One Hypothetical Link for the Relationship between Intestinal Microbiota and Cancer - Where We Are and Where Shall We Go?

Carmen Wing Han Chan1, Bernard Man Hin Law1, Mary Miu Yee Waye1, Judy Yuet Wa Chan1, Winnie Kwok Wei So1, Ka Ming Chow1.   

Abstract

Previous epidemiological studies had provided evidence for a link between the microbial dysbiosis and cancer, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the molecular basis of this link remains elusive. Recently, the association between plasma levels of trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), an oxidised form of trimethylamine (TMA), and risks of various cancers was demonstrated. The discovery could potentially provide an alternative explanation for the aforementioned link, as TMA production is attributed to intestinal bacteria. Current evidence suggests that inflammation could be a potential molecular mechanism to explain the link between TMAO and cancer, although other mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage and disruption in protein folding might also play a role. This mini-review article first provides an overview of the current evidence for the association between TMAO and certain cancer types, and the potential mechanisms that could explain their association. Thereafter, the direction of further research on the connection between the intestinal microbiota, TMAO and cancer is suggested. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; intestinal microbiota; trimethylamine; trimethylamine-N-oxide

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737123      PMCID: PMC6843879          DOI: 10.7150/jca.31737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

In the past decades, cancer has become one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide, with more than 14 million people worldwide having developed cancer in 2012 1. Emerging studies over the past years suggested that microbial dysbiosis, a pathogenic change in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, is one of the potential factors that are associated with increased risk of certain cancers, in particular colorectal cancer (CRC) 2. Indeed, numerous studies had reported a change in the intestinal abundance of certain bacterial genera or species in CRC patients and animal models 3. Further, possible mechanisms were proposed as to how microbial dysbiosis may lead to carcinogenesis. These mechanisms include intestinal inflammation and genotoxin-induced DNA damage of intestinal cells 4, 5. A more detailed description on the potential mechanism in how the intestinal microbiota is linked to various cancer types was conducted by Sheflin et al 6, and how certain bacterial species can potentially lead to development of cancer was reviewed by Hullar et al 7. In addition to the aforementioned possible mechanisms on how intestinal microbiota is related to cancer, some recent studies suggest that trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), an oxidised metabolite of trimethylamine (TMA), could also perhaps be a potential candidate that may provide a link for this relationship. In this mini-review, we will first describe how TMAO is produced by the intestinal bacteria and the data that reveal the association between TMAO and increased cancer risks, highlighting the benefits of further research into this association. We will then discuss the possible further work that would provide evidence and facilitate our understanding on this association. This article therefore serves to make a case for further exploration of this relationship, which would provide further insights into how diet and intestinal microbiota is associated with cancer risks.

TMAO: The Source

TMAO generation in humans involves a two-step sequential mechanism from precursor molecules such as choline and L-carnitine via TMA. These precursor molecules, which were shown to be present abundantly in red meat, eggs, milk and certain fish products including salmon 8, 9, would first be converted to TMA by certain TMA-producing bacteria in the gut microbiome. Thereafter, TMA would be absorbed through the intestinal wall and transported to the liver, where it would be metabolised into TMAO through oxygenation, a process catalysed by flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3) 10. Previous studies provided several lines of evidence that the intestinal microbiota plays a significant role in TMAO production. Koeth et al 11 demonstrated that human subjects who had undergone one-week treatment with antibiotics, for the purpose of suppressing their intestinal microbiota, had a significantly lower level of plasma and urinary TMAO following a carnitine challenge test, compared to untreated controls. Likewise, subjects who received a phosphatidylcholine challenge also exhibited a reduced plasma TMAO levels upon administration of antibiotics, and such effect was abolished after the removal of the administered antibiotics 12. Such phenomenon was also observed in a mouse model 13. Further, Romano et al 14 had recently revealed a number of intestinal bacterial species that are able to produce TMA following an in vitro incubation in mice gut medium supplemented with choline. These TMA-producing bacteria largely belong to the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla. One observation of note is that none of the bacterial species screened for TMA production in the Romano et al study belong to Bacteroidetes, one of the major bacterial phyla present in the human intestine. Consistent with this observation, previous studies demonstrated that the enzymes required for the conversion of choline and L-carnitine to TMA are present in Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, but these enzymes are absent in Bacteroidetes 15, 16. These observations therefore suggest that the level of TMA production is not only dependent on the amount of choline and L-carnitine intake, but could also perhaps be modulated by changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, such as the ratio of the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, the two major bacterial phyla present in the human intestine. In line with this hypothesis, a recent study demonstrated that individuals who produced a higher level of TMAO (high TMAO producers) following the intake of high-choline or high-carnitine diet possessed a higher Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio in their intestinal microbiota than the low TMAO producers 17. Nevertheless, further human and animal studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis. Of note, however, changes in TMAO levels are not only solely dependent on the action of intestinal bacteria, but could also be contributed by dietary intake. Indeed, previous studies had indicated that fish intake among human subjects would lead to a significant increase in their circulatory TMAO levels 17, 18, and positive association was observed between fish consumption and plasma TMAO levels in humans 19. As indicated by Landfald et al. 20, free TMAO is present in large quantities in a variety of seafood, including fish, and it is plausible that such observed increase in circulatory TMAO levels after fish intake could be attributed to the intake of the free TMAO present in fish. Nevertheless, current findings on the association between fish consumption and TMAO levels are inconsistent between studies, as one study reported a lack of an association between the two aforementioned parameters 21. Overall, increase in TMAO levels can be attributed to two sources: 1) TMA production from precursor molecules by the action of intestinal bacteria and subsequent oxidation in liver; and 2) dietary intake of TMAO-rich foods, although further studies are needed to confirm the contribution of the latter to increase in TMAO levels.

Potential Relationship between TMAO and Cancer: The Evidence

With the understanding of the relationship between intestinal microbiota and carcinogenesis, particularly CRC, research efforts had started to focus on whether intestinal microbiota-dependent metabolites (including TMAO) could also be linked to cancer. One of the first studies to investigate this link was published in 2014, where Bae et al 22 showed that plasma TMAO levels are positively correlated with CRC risks among women in the United States. In the study, subjects in the highest quartile of plasma TMAO concentration were found to be at 3.4 times greater risk of rectal cancer than those in the lowest quartile of plasma TMAO concentration. A recent study also demonstrated an increased serum TMAO level among CRC patients, compared to healthy controls, rendering TMAO a potential prognostic marker for CRC 23. These data therefore suggest that TMAO could either directly or indirectly lead to CRC. Interestingly however, a recent study showed that no obvious associations exist between serum TMAO levels and rectal cancer risks among Finnish men 24. Nevertheless, another study demonstrated that TMAO could serve as an intermediate that links the metabolic activities of the intestinal microbiota and CRC pathogenesis 25, thereby providing further supporting evidence for a role of TMAO in CRC risks. The authors showed that there are certain genetic pathways that are associated with both TMAO and CRC carcinogenesis. These pathways include cell cycle progression and Wnt signalling. The sharing of these pathways by both TMAO and CRC implies that these pathways could be involved in the link between TMAO and CRC. It is therefore tempting to speculate that increased TMAO levels could perhaps modulate the activity of these pathways, although this hypothesis requires confirmation through further studies. In addition to CRC, published data also suggest that TMAO could be related to the increased risk of other cancers. Metabolomic profiling analysis of prostate cancer patients and healthy controls in a recent cohort study in Finland revealed a positive correlation of an increased level of plasma TMAO with aggressive prostate cancer risk 26. This correlation was further supported by a previous finding that increased choline intake, which subsequently leads to increased TMA and TMAO production, is also associated with increased risk of lethal prostate cancer 27. Further, proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic data revealed that patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma has a higher seral level of TMAO compared to healthy controls 28. These studies therefore suggest that TMA production by intestinal microbiota, and the subsequent increase in plasma TMAO levels, not only may modify CRC risks, but also the risk of other cancer types such as prostate cancer and oral cancer. Nevertheless, one indeed may argue against the positive relationship between TMAO and cancer with the evidence that increased fish intake, which was shown to reduce cancer risks in a meta-analysis 29, would increase circulatory TMAO levels 17, 18. However, despite the increased intake of free TMAO, fish consumption is also associated with the intake of certain health-promoting compounds shown to be potentially protective against cancer. For example, fish oil present in fish contains an abundant amount of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid, and these were previously shown to exhibit chemo preventive effect of CRC via mechanisms such as downregulating the expression of pro-cancerous genes including pro-inflammatory cytokines 30. It is possible that the cancer chemo preventive effect of fish oil intake would outweigh the detrimental effect of increased TMAO levels in the promotion of cancer, making increased fish intake being protective against cancer despite its promoting effect on circulatory TMAO levels. Notably, however, further studies may be needed for confirmation of this hypothesis. Taken together, data from previous studies have contributed evidence to a previously unappreciated relationship between TMAO and carcinogenesis, even though a recent study demonstrated no relationship between TMAO levels and CRC risks 24. While we cannot rule out the possible effect of gender and ethnic differences on this relationship, the observed discrepancies could perhaps be explained by the inclusion of different covariates in the multivariate logistic regression analyses performed in these two studies. For example, after adjusting for factors such as education level and energy intake of subjects, TMAO was found not to be associated with rectal cancer risk 24, as did when these covariates were not included in the regression analysis 22. Furthermore, other factors, such as kidney function, could exhibit confounding effects on the gut microbiome that produce metabolites that could interact with TMAO, and flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO3) genotype 31. Moreover, as suggested by Ufnal and Pham 32, plasma TMAO levels can be affected by factors such as the permeability of gut-blood barrier, which has a function in regulating the entry of molecules from the gut into the bloodstream. Therefore, assessment of the association between plasma TMAO levels and disease risk may need to take into account of gut-blood barrier permeability, assessing this parameter as a confounding factor, potentially via the double sugar test 33. Indeed, a recent study observed a higher TMA level in the blood in hypertensive rats which were characterised by an increased permeability of the gut-blood barrier to TMA, resulting in more TMA being delivered to the liver where the TMA is oxidised to TMAO 34. The authors also suggested that it is the permeability of the gut-blood barrier that may modulate disease risk, rather than plasma TMAO levels. Therefore, the discrepancies in the findings between studies reporting associations between TMAO levels and cancer risks could also be attributed to differences in gut-blood permeability between individuals. Nevertheless, with the finding that TMAO is involved in a number of cancer-related cellular pathways 25, it is still worthwhile to explore further on the relationship between TMAO and cancer.

Potential Relationship between TMAO and Cancer: Possible Mechanisms

With increasing evidence suggesting the potential association between TMAO levels and cancer risk through observational association studies described above, research had recently started directing towards the exploration of the possible mechanisms on how TMAO could contribute to carcinogenesis. Currently, several lines of evidence have suggested that inflammation could be a possible factor that provides a link between TMAO and cancer. Indeed, the causal relationship between chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis, including CRC, is already well-established 35, 36. However, recent evidence has suggested that TMAO could play a role in the inflammatory process. For example, TMAO was found to synergise the pro-inflammatory effects of H. pylori infections on gastric epithelial cells, through the increase in the expression level of pro-inflammatory genes including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and chemokine ligands 37, which were shown to play roles in cancer progression 38-41. This finding therefore suggests a potential link between TMAO and gastric cancer via the inflammatory process. Consistent with this, Yue et al also demonstrated that TMAO can trigger the activation of the nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome 42, 43, which was suggested to be implicated in the growth and/or metastasis of a variety of cancers including head and neck cancer, oral cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer and colorectal cancer 44-46. Moreover, association studies had provided further support for a link between TMAO and inflammation. Serum level of TMAO was shown to be positively correlated with the level of certain pro-inflammatory mediators including tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and IL-6 among diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease 47. An earlier study within a German population also revealed that plasma TMAO concentrations exhibit a positive association with plasma TNF-α levels 21. Since both TNF-α and IL-6 are implicated in carcinogenesis through the induction of chronic inflammation 48, these data therefore provide further evidence that inflammation could be a likely factor for the contribution of TMAO to carcinogenesis. Further research on this link is recommended to delineate the mechanism on how TMAO is linked to cancer via inflammation induction. The role of TMAO in exacerbating inflammation can further be demonstrated by the reported potential association between TMAO and diseases such as cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis and chronic kidney disease 49-51, which, like cancer, were found to be associated with the occurrence of pro-inflammatory events 52-54. Indeed, a recent systematic review on 11 cohort studies demonstrated a positive association between circulatory TMAO levels and cardiovascular disease risks in humans 55, and a cohort study also showed that plasma TMAO levels were higher among patients with chronic kidney disease 56. TMAO was found to promote vascular inflammation in mice via activation of nuclear factor-kappa B and the subsequent increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators 57. Further, renal dysfunction, which occurs in chronic kidney disease, in mice was found to be contributed by increased TMAO levels and the subsequent induction of inflammation 58. These findings add further weight to the contributory role of TMAO in inflammation. With inflammation known to be implicated in carcinogenesis 48, these findings could strengthen the argument that TMAO may contribute to carcinogenesis through inflammatory pathways. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that recent studies have also revealed an indirect protective effect of TMAO against cardiovascular disease. For example, low-dose chronic treatment of hypertensive rats with TMAO was shown to help improve their heart function and reduce cardiac fibrosis, thereby protecting these rats against hypertension 59. Further, L-carnitine treatment was also found to reduce the severity of aortic lesions in mice via an increase in TMAO levels, demonstrating the protective effect of TMAO against atherosclerosis 60. Notably, both hypertension and atherosclerosis are known risk factors of cardiovascular disease 61, 62. Oxidative stress might also be one of the factors linking TMAO and cancer. Oxidative stress was previously suggested to contribute to cancer via the activation of inflammation 63, 64. Recently, studies showed that TMAO could be implicated in oxidative stress. Increased level of circulating TMAO was shown to induce superoxide production, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) linked to oxidative stress 65. In an in vitro assay, TMAO was also shown to stimulate the production of ROS in cells 43. Nevertheless, more studies are needed in order to confirm the association between TMAO, oxidative stress and cancer. In addition, other studies have also contributed evidence that helps suggest the possible molecular mechanisms in how TMAO could be linked to cancer. For example, TMAO was suggested to be involved in molecular pathways that lead to the generation of N-nitroso compounds 66, which were known to induce DNA damage, an event that can contribute to carcinogenesis 67. This suggests a potential involvement of DNA damage in TMAO-contributed carcinogenesis. Furthermore, TMAO could lead to the loss-of-function of alpha-casein 68, a chaperone protein previously found to function as a tumour suppressor that helps prevent breast cancer 69, implying that disrupted quality control of protein folding could also be involved in TMAO-contributed carcinogenesis. Overall, inflammation appears to be a promising candidate that could provide a link between TMAO and carcinogenesis. Other potential mechanisms, including oxidative stress, might also be involved, despite the need for further validation through association and molecular studies.

TMAO and Cancer: The Cause or the Consequence?

Despite the promising evidence that TMAO could be implicated in an increase in cancer risks, the role of TMAO in contributing to carcinogenesis remains controversial. Although previous studies did observe a higher level of plasma/seral TMAO among cancer patients, it remains unclear whether such increase in TMAO levels is a cause or a consequence of cancer. Currently, there is a scarcity of studies that explore whether alterations in TMAO levels would have affected certain molecular pathways or gene expression profiles directly implicated in carcinogenesis. As a result, it is difficult to determine whether TMAO is really causative of cancer or a sheer marker for tumour formation and/or progression. Indeed, the elusiveness on whether TMAO is a molecular contributor to disease development or it is a sheer marker for a disease-associated condition was previously suggested 31. After all, previous studies also showed that TMAO could potentially be implicated in the inhibition of molecular pathways suggested to be involved in cancer progression. For example, TMAO was shown to play a role in the reduction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress 70, 71, a condition previously suggested to be implicated in cancer cell proliferation and survival, which leads to tumour progression 72-74. Nevertheless, the mechanisms on how TMAO can inhibit ER stress remain to be dissected, although its role in attenuating unfolded protein response, a cellular response that helps ameliorate ER stress, was previously suggested 70. Such observations highlight the current uncertainty in how TMAO is implicated in cancer. In light of such contrasting findings, it is of interest that the role of TMAO in carcinogenesis be established. Its potential contribution to tumour formation and progression should be explored. This would help establish whether TMAO can serve as a molecular target for dietary interventions dedicated for cancer prevention, thereby opening up further avenues for research into the strategies in achieving effective cancer prevention.

Potential Relationship between TMAO and Cancer: What More Should We Know?

With recent studies started showing evidence on a possible relationship between TMAO and cancer, it would be of great interest that this relationship is to be investigated further, which would help establish whether there is a causal role of TMAO in cancer. As TMA/TMAO production is primarily dependent on the intestinal bacteria, such investigation would enable us to explore and potentially generate new avenues of research into, and a better understanding of, the inter-relationship between the intestinal microbiota and cancer. This would thereby be useful in providing useful clues for the development of alternative therapeutic strategies in cancer prevention or treatment, through the manipulation of intestinal microbiota. In this section, the authors set out certain areas of research work that should be useful in shedding further light on the link between the intestinal microbiota, TMAO and cancer.

Further exploration of the molecular mechanisms of TMAO-associated carcinogenesis

As indicated above, despite the availability of data indicating a positive association between TMAO and cancer risks, there are currently very limited studies that investigate the molecular basis of this association. Indeed, Xu et al 25 had suggested a number of genetic pathways that could be involved in the relationship between TMAO and CRC. Although previous studies provided evidence that inflammation could be a potential mechanism linking TMAO and carcinogenesis, current data provide little indication on how TMAO-associated pathways, such as cell cycle progression and Wnt signalling, could contribute to cancer from the molecular perspective. Moreover, most studies investigating the potential mechanisms of TMAO-induced carcinogenesis was conducted by cell treatment with TMAO, which do not enable the investigation of the effect of physiological production of TMAO on the proposed mechanisms. More research efforts should therefore be directed towards the exploration, through both in vitro and in vivo studies, of the changes in the activities of the pathways that are implicated in carcinogenesis upon TMAO production, rather than TMAO treatment. For example, transcriptomic analyses of colon cells extracted from mice fed with a diet high in TMA precursors (including choline and carnitine) would enable a further understanding on the changes in gene expression associated with increased TMAO production. Expression proteomic techniques may also be utilised to assess the changes in the expression level of these genes at the protein level, to confirm the data obtained from transcriptomic analyses. This would provide useful clues as to whether molecular and cellular pathways known to be implicated in carcinogenesis could be affected by TMAO. Thereafter, pathway analyses may be employed to explore further the pathways that may be involved in TMAO-associated carcinogenesis, based on the genes identified to have exhibited changes in expression level upon the intake of a high-choline or high-carnitine diet. Such studies would complement the data from studies involving cellular TMAO treatment, enhancing the evidence from studies that investigate the molecular basis on how TMAO is related to CRC and other cancers.

Could diet-induced changes in the composition of intestinal microbiota be linked to cancer risks through modulation of TMA/TMAO production?

Previous studies suggested an effect of diet on the composition of intestinal microbiota 75. With the discovery that both the compositional changes of intestinal microbiota and TMAO are associated with cancer risk, it is hypothesised that TMA and TMAO production could be a factor that bridges the relationship between diet, intestinal microbiota and cancer. Consistent with this, vegetarian subjects were found to possess a different intestinal microbiota composition and exhibit a reduced level of TMAO production compared to omnivorous subjects 11, strengthening the evidence that diet could play a role in the modification of the composition of intestinal microbiota and TMAO production. However, to date, limited studies have been performed to investigate whether diet could be linked to cancer risks via changes in the level of intestinal TMA/TMAO production. Therefore, studies that investigate whether frequent intake of functional foods known to cause a health-promoting change in the composition of intestinal microbiota, such as rice bran 76, 77, could modulate plasma TMAO levels would be of value. Such studies would provide evidence as to whether alterations in TMA, and the subsequent TMAO, production could serve as a link between alterations in intestinal microbiota and carcinogenesis. Indeed, previous research demonstrated that the intake of soy products, a functional food consumed widely in Asia, would lead to an alteration in intestinal microbiota 78 and a lowered cancer risk 79. Following these lines of evidence, it would be of interest to investigate whether soy product consumption would confer a lowered cancer risk through shaping the intestinal microbiota that results in lowered TMA/TMAO production. In light of this, dietary interventions with soy products, such as soymilk, may be performed in certain mouse models that mimic human CRC, such as CDX2P 9.5-NLS lacZ transgenic mice previously developed and used by Hinoi et al 80, and confirm whether soymilk consumption in these mice would lead to a reduced plasma TMAO levels, together with a modification of their intestinal microbiota and a reduction in the number of tumours present. Similarly, with the finding that vegetarian diets could lead to alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and a concomitant reduction in TMAO production 11, studies on the effect of vegetarian diets in these mice on tumour numbers may also be of value. With the inhibitory effect of such dietary interventions on tumour formation established in mice, further studies involving such dietary interventions can be implemented among cancer patients, assessing whether they would confer any protective effects against carcinogenesis in humans. After the intervention, plasma levels of TMAO and cancer-associated biomarkers, such as Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) 81, 82, should be determined via blood tests, coupled with an assessment of the changes of the composition of the intestinal microbiota of the intervention participants. These assessments would help evaluate whether the intervention has an effect on a concomitant reduction of TMAO and CEA levels, through modulation of the intestinal microbiota. Such studies would be useful in providing mechanistic insights into how functional food intake could be linked to reduced cancer risks via the modification of the composition of intestinal microbiota, and thus providing further evidence that TMAO is related to cancer risks. Further, as there are no published interventional studies that investigate whether physiological changes in TMAO levels would lead to molecular events associated with carcinogenesis, the suggested research work set out above would provide a starting point to assess whether modulation of TMAO production could have a direct contribution to carcinogenesis.

Could TMAO be related to other cancers too?

While previous studies demonstrate a potential association between TMAO and colorectal and prostate cancers, it would also be of interest to investigate whether TMAO is associated with higher risks of other cancer types as well. Previous studies indicated that the changes in the composition of the microbiome not only could be associated with increased risk of CRC, but also that of breast 83 and gastric cancers 84. Indeed, these two cancer types were also postulated to be among the TMAO-related diseases by Xu et al 25, although epidemiological data that support this finding are lacking. Nevertheless, these findings suggest that TMAO could also be associated with both breast and gastric cancers. Further metabolomic profiling studies are therefore required to establish whether a correlation exists between TMAO levels and risk of these cancers. Such studies would provide further evidence for the potential link between TMAO and carcinogenesis, and would open up further avenues for the research into the molecular aspects of this link.

Concluding Remarks

The past decade revealed an increase in the number of studies demonstrating the involvement of the intestinal microbiota in carcinogenesis, and previous research had also indicated a role of diet in the modulation of the composition of intestinal microbiota. However, the molecular basis of how diet-induced changes in intestinal microbiota are related to cancer is still not fully understood. The discovery that TMAO could potentially be associated with the risk of certain cancers, and that they can be produced by the intestinal bacteria from TMA precursors ingested in diet, has certainly provided us with opportunities to explore further on the relationship between the intestinal microbiota and cancer. Future research efforts should be directed towards the unravelling of the molecular mechanisms and pathways leading to TMAO-induced carcinogenesis through in vivo and in vitro studies. Further investigations on whether intake of health-promoting functional foods known to modify the composition of intestinal microbiota can lead to modifications in TMA and TMAO production levels would also be useful in deciphering the upstream events in diet-induced cancers such as CRC. These studies would ultimately enable us to gain a better understanding on the previously unappreciated relationship between TMAO and cancer. More importantly, they would inform the molecular basis on how changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota could contribute to carcinogenesis, and whether consumption of certain functional foods that modify the intestinal microbiota, such as rice bran or soy products, would be effective in cancer prevention and intestinal health promotion.
  83 in total

1.  A metabolomic study of biomarkers of meat and fish intake.

Authors:  William Cheung; Pekka Keski-Rahkonen; Nada Assi; Pietro Ferrari; Heinz Freisling; Sabina Rinaldi; Nadia Slimani; Raul Zamora-Ros; Milena Rundle; Gary Frost; Helena Gibbons; Eibhlin Carr; Lorraine Brennan; Amanda J Cross; Valeria Pala; Salvatore Panico; Carlotta Sacerdote; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Tilman Kühn; Rudolf Kaaks; Heiner Boeing; Anna Floegel; Francesca Mancini; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Laura Baglietto; Antonia Trichopoulou; Androniki Naska; Philippos Orfanos; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Preoperative serum TMAO level is a new prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liu; Heng Liu; Caijun Yuan; Yinxu Zhang; Wei Wang; Shuding Hu; Lei Liu; Ying Wang
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Gershon Y Locker; Stanley Hamilton; Jules Harris; John M Jessup; Nancy Kemeny; John S Macdonald; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 as a putative biomarker for gastric cancer progression.

Authors:  Jae-Joon Jung; Sewon Noh; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Minkyu Jung; Tae Soo Kim; Sung Hoon Noh; Jae Kyung Roh; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 5.  Inflammatory cytokines in cancer: tumour necrosis factor and interleukin 6 take the stage.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Michael Karin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) as a New Potential Therapeutic Target for Insulin Resistance and Cancer.

Authors:  Jens Oellgaard; Signe Abitz Winther; Tobias Schmidt Hansen; Peter Rossing; Bernt Johan von Scholten
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  NMR ((1)H and (13)C) based signatures of abnormal choline metabolism in oral squamous cell carcinoma with no prominent Warburg effect.

Authors:  Swarnendu Bag; Deb Ranjan Banerjee; Amit Basak; Amit Kumar Das; Mousumi Pal; Rita Banerjee; Ranjan Rashmi Paul; Jyotirmoy Chatterjee
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  W H Wilson Tang; Zeneng Wang; Bruce S Levison; Robert A Koeth; Earl B Britt; Xiaoming Fu; Yuping Wu; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Serum Trimethylamine N-oxide, Carnitine, Choline, and Betaine in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Alpha Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study.

Authors:  Kristin A Guertin; Xinmin S Li; Barry I Graubard; Demetrius Albanes; Stephanie J Weinstein; James J Goedert; Zeneng Wang; Stanley L Hazen; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Relationship of Serum Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Levels with early Atherosclerosis in Humans.

Authors:  Elko Randrianarisoa; Angela Lehn-Stefan; Xiaolin Wang; Miriam Hoene; Andreas Peter; Silke S Heinzmann; Xinjie Zhao; Ingmar Königsrainer; Alfred Königsrainer; Bernd Balletshofer; Jürgen Machann; Fritz Schick; Andreas Fritsche; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Guowang Xu; Rainer Lehmann; Norbert Stefan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  16 in total

1.  Trimethyllysine predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in community-dwelling adults and patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Espen Ø Bjørnestad; Indu Dhar; Gard F T Svingen; Eva R Pedersen; Mads M Svenningsson; Grethe S Tell; Per M Ueland; Stein Ørn; Gerhard Sulo; Reijo Laaksonen; Ottar Nygård
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-07-16

Review 2.  Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in CRC progression and causation.

Authors:  Nishu Dalal; Rekha Jalandra; Nitin Bayal; Amit K Yadav; Minakshi Sharma; Govind K Makharia; Pramod Kumar; Rajeev Singh; Pratima R Solanki; Anil Kumar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Dietary Fat and Cancer-Which Is Good, Which Is Bad, and the Body of Evidence.

Authors:  Bianka Bojková; Pawel J Winklewski; Magdalena Wszedybyl-Winklewska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Gut Microbiota-Mediated Inflammation and Gut Permeability in Patients with Obesity and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Lidia Sánchez-Alcoholado; Rafael Ordóñez; Ana Otero; Isaac Plaza-Andrade; Aurora Laborda-Illanes; José Antonio Medina; Bruno Ramos-Molina; Jaime Gómez-Millán; María Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  A Holistic View of Berberine Inhibiting Intestinal Carcinogenesis in Conventional Mice Based on Microbiome-Metabolomics Analysis.

Authors:  Haitao Chen; Fan Zhang; Jin Zhang; Xinjie Zhang; Yong Guo; Qinghua Yao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Colon Carcinogenesis: The Interplay Between Diet and Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Yean Leng Loke; Ming Tsuey Chew; Yun Fong Ngeow; Wendy Wan Dee Lim; Suat Cheng Peh
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 7.  The trace aminergic system: a gender-sensitive therapeutic target for IBS?

Authors:  Lesha Pretorius; Carine Smith
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 8.  Microbial Metabolites in Colorectal Cancer: Basic and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Yao Peng; Yuqiang Nie; Jun Yu; Chi Chun Wong
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-03-10

9.  A Metabolic Model of Intestinal Secretions: The Link between Human Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Pejman Salahshouri; Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi; Mahdi Jalili; Faiz M Khan; Olaf Wolkenhauer; Ali Salehzadeh-Yazdi
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 10.  Alzheimer Disease: Recent Updates on Apolipoprotein E and Gut Microbiome Mediation of Oxidative Stress, and Prospective Interventional Agents.

Authors:  Benson Oa Botchway; Favour C Okoye; Yili Chen; William E Arthur; Marong Fang
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.