| Literature DB >> 27228955 |
Elko Randrianarisoa1,2, Angela Lehn-Stefan1,2,3, Xiaolin Wang4, Miriam Hoene1,2, Andreas Peter1,2,3, Silke S Heinzmann3,5, Xinjie Zhao4, Ingmar Königsrainer6, Alfred Königsrainer6, Bernd Balletshofer1, Jürgen Machann2,3, Fritz Schick2,3,7, Andreas Fritsche1,2,3, Hans-Ulrich Häring1,2,3, Guowang Xu4, Rainer Lehmann1,2,3, Norbert Stefan1,2,3.
Abstract
Circulating trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) levels predict cardiovascular disease (CVD), possibly by impacting on cholesterol metabolism and oxidative stress. Because hepatic TMAO production is regulated by insulin signalling and it is unclear whether and to what extent circulating TMAO levels associate with CVD risk, independently of insulin resistance and its important determinants fatty liver and visceral obesity, we have now addressed this question in 220 subjects who participated in the Tübingen Lifestyle Intervention Program. Visceral fat mass (r = 0.40, p < 0.0001), liver fat content (r = 0.23, p = 0.0005) and TMAO levels (r = 0.26, p < 0.0001) associated positively, and insulin sensitivity associated negatively (r = -0.18, p = 0.009) with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Higher TMAO levels (std.-Beta 0.11, p = 0.03) predicted increased cIMT, independently of age, sex and visceral fat mass. While during the lifestyle intervention most cardiovascular risk parameters improved, mean TMAO levels did not change (p = 0.18). However, cIMT decreased significantly (p = 0.0056) only in subjects in the tertile with the largest decrease of TMAO levels (>20%). We provide novel information that increased serum TMAO levels associate with increased cIMT, independently of established cardiovascular risk markers, including insulin resistance, visceral obesity and fatty liver. Furthermore, the decrease of cIMT during a lifestyle intervention may be related to the decrease of TMAO levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27228955 PMCID: PMC4882652 DOI: 10.1038/srep26745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Anthropometric and metabolic parameters at baseline and at follow-up.
| Baseline | Follow-up | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (males/females) | 90/130 | ||
| Age (years) | 46 ± 11 | ||
| Body mass index (kg ∙ m−2) | 29.5 ± 4.8 | 28.6 ± 4.7 | <0.0001 |
| Total body fatMRT (kg) | 26.2 ± 10.3 | 23.7 ± 10.1 | <0.0001 |
| Visceral fatMRT (kg) | 3.1 ± 1.9 | 2.6 ± 1.8 | <0.0001 |
| Liver fatMRS (%) | 5.8 ± 6.6 | 4.2 ± 5.4 | <0.0001 |
| Fasting glucose (mM) | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 0.01 |
| Fasting insulin (pM) | 63 ± 44 | 55 ± 34 | <0.0001 |
| 2 hr glucose (mM) | 7.0 ± 1.5 | 6.7 ± 1.7 | 0.007 |
| Total-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 194 ± 36 | 192 ± 37 | 0.05 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 53 ± 13 | 53 ± 14 | 0.20 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 121 ± 30 | 118 ± 33 | 0.02 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 126 ± 110 | 118 ± 96 | 0.03 |
| Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl) | 95 ± 22 | 92 ± 21 | 0.006 |
| Hs-CRP (mg/dl) | 0.22 ± 0.31 | 0.17 ± 0.25 | <0.0001 |
| TNF-alpha (pg/ml) | 3.0 ± 7.6 | 1.3 ± 2.8 | 0.0004 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 124 ± 16 | 122 ± 15 | 0.04 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 77 ± 11 | 75 ± 10 | 0.02 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 80.1 ± 16.1 | 83.5 ± 17.9 | <0.0001 |
| HOMA-IR (arb. u.) | 2.5 ± 1.9 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | <0.0001 |
| Insulin sensitivityOGTT (arb. u.) | 12.7 ± 7.1 | 14.3 ± 7.7 | <0.0001 |
| Insulin sensitivityClamp (μmol·kg−1·min−1·pM−1) | 0.066 ± 0.039 | 0.079 ± 0.050 | 0.06 |
| Insulin clearance (arb. u.) | 5.52 ± 1.91 | 5.72 ± 1.88 | 0.007 |
| cIMT (mm) | 0.57 ± 0.12 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.02 |
| TMAO (μmol/l) | 2.83 ± 1.62 | 3.2 ± 2.89 | 0.18 |
Data are means ± SD.
*Only available in 144 subjects.
#Only available in 167 subjects at baseline and in 45 subjects at follow-up. MRT: magnetic resonance tomography, MRS: magnetic resonance spectroscopy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; cIMT: carotid intima-media thickness; TMAO: trimethylamine N-oxide; BP: blood pressure.
Relationships of cIMT and fasting TMAO levels with selected parameters at baseline.
| TMAO levels | cIMT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | |
| Age | ||||
| Body mass index | ||||
| Total body fat MRT | 0.07 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.42 |
| Visceral fatMRT | 0.12 | 0.07 | ||
| Liver fatMRS | 0.05 | 0.45 | ||
| Fasting glucose | ||||
| Fasting insulin | 0.02 | 0.72 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| 2 hr glucose | −0.08 | 0.25 | ||
| Total cholesterol | ||||
| HDL-cholesterol | 0.01 | 0.84 | −0.12 | 0.08 |
| LDL-cholesterol | ||||
| Triglycerides | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| Apolipoprotein B | ||||
| Hs-CRP | −0.01 | 0.88 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
| TNF-alpha | 0.10 | 0.22 | ||
| Systolic BP | 0.006 | 0.93 | ||
| Diastolic BP | −0.005 | 0.94 | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| eGFR | −0.06 | 0.36 | ||
| HOMA-IR | 0.05 | 0.48 | ||
| Insulin sensitivityOGTT | −0.002 | 0.98 | ||
| Insulin sensitivityClamp | −0.03 | 0.75 | −0.13 | 0.10 |
| Insulin clearance | 0.03 | 0.62 | −0.11 | 0.12 |
r, Pearson correlation coefficient; *Only available in 144 subjects. #Only available in 167 subjects. BIA, body impedance; MRT, magnetic resonance tomography; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy. MRT: magnetic resonance tomography, MRS: magnetic resonance spectroscopy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; cIMT: carotid intima-media thickness; TMAO: trimethylamine N-oxide; BP: blood pressure.
Figure 1Cross-sectional relationship of fasting serum TMAO levels with cIMT.
Univariate cross-sectional relationship (Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value) of fasting serum trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) levels with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in 220 subjects.
Determinants of cIMT in multivariate linear regression models.
| Covariates | Estimate ± SE | t-value | std.−Beta | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | −0.02 ± 0.01 | −1.14 | −0.07 | 0.25 |
| Age | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 10.31 | 0.56 | <0.0001 |
| Visceral fat mass | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 2.45 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| TMAO levels | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 2.15 | 0.11 | 0.03 |
Anthropometric and metabolic parameters in tertiles of changes of TMAO levels during the lifestyle intervention.
| 1st Tertile | 2nd Tertile | 3rd Tertile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | |
| TMAO (μmol/l) | 3.84 ± 2.06 | 2.1 ± 0.80 | 2.54 ± 1.11 | 2.57 ± 1.07 | 2.13 ± 0.94 | 4.82 ± 4.43 |
| cIMT (mm) | 0.58 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.12 | 0.56 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.12 |
| Gender (males/females) | 26/47 | 29/46 | 35/37 | |||
| Age (years) | 44 ± 12 | 47 ± 11 | 48 ± 10 | |||
| Body mass index (kg ∙ m−2) | 29.8 ± 5.2 | 29.2 ± 5.0 | 29.5 ± 4.6 | 28.5 ± 4.7 | 29.3 ± 4.8 | 27.9 ± 4.4 |
| Total body fat MRT (kg) | 26.7 ± 11.3 | 25.1 ± 10.9 | 26.7 ± 9.8 | 24.1 ± 9.7 | 25.1 ± 9.7 | 21.8 ± 9.6 |
| Visceral fat MRT (kg) | 2.8 ± 1.8 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 3.0 ± 1.8 | 2.6 ± 1.8 | 3.3 ± 2.0 | 2.7 ± 1. |
| Liver fat MRS (%) | 5.6 ± 6.3 | 4.5 ± 6.6 | 4.9 ± 5.4 | 3.9 ± 4.9 | 6.9 ± 7.8 | 4.2 ± 4.4 |
| Fasting glucose (mM) | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 5.2 ± 0.5 |
| 2 hr glucose (mM) | 6.7 ± 1.4 | 6.5 ± 1.6 | 6.9 ± 1.5 | 6.9 ± 1.8 | 7.3 ± 1.7 | 6.8 ± 1.6 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 193 ± 36 | 193 ± 36 | 188 ± 37 | 185 ± 38 | 201 ± 37 | 198 ± 38 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 54 ± 14 | 54 ± 12 | 50 ± 11 | 50 ± 12 | 54 ± 14 | 55 ± 16 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 120 ± 31 | 121 ± 30 | 117 ± 29 | 113 ± 37 | 125 ± 29 | 119 ± 32 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 117 ± 101 | 110 ± 62 | 117 ± 72 | 110 ± 71 | 145 ± 144 | 134 ± 138 |
| Apolipoprotein B (mg/dl) | 94 ± 21 | 91 ± 18 | 92 ± 22 | 91 ± 23 | 99 ± 23 | 93 ± 22 |
| Hs-CRP (mg/dl) | 0.26 ± 0.38 | 0.18 ± 0.27 | 0.20 ± 0.26 | 0.19 ± 0.28 | 0.21 ± 0.28 | 0.15 ± 0.21 |
| TNF-alpha (pg/ml)§ | 2.9 ± 6.7 | 1.8 ± 4.4 | 4.0 ± 10.0 | 1.3 ± 2.2 | 2.2 ± 5.5 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 121 ± 16 | 120 ± 16 | 127 ± 17 | 124 ± 16 | 124 ± 15 | 123 ± 14 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 76 ± 11 | 75 ± 10 | 77 ± 11 | 76 ± 10 | 77 ± 12 | 76 ± 10 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 82.1 ± 17.7 | 85.7 ± 19.3 | 78.5 ± 16.1 | 83.8 ± 18.2 | 79.7± 14.3 | 82.1 ± 16.1 |
| HOMA-IR (arb. u.) | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 2.4 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 2.5 | 1.9 ± 1.4 |
| Insulin sensitivityOGTT (arb. u.) | 12.7 ± 6.8 | 12.9 ± 6.8 | 12.8 ± 7.0 | 14.8 ± 7.8 | 12.6 ± 7.5 | 15.3 ± 8.3 |
Data are means ± SD. §Only available in 144 subjects. #Only available in 167 subjects at baseline and in 45 subjects at follow-up. MRT: magnetic resonance tomography, MRS: magnetic resonance spectroscopy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; cIMT: carotid intima-media thickness; TMAO: trimethylamine N-oxide; BP: blood pressure; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.0001.
Figure 2Change of TMAO levels and change of cIMT during 9 months of lifestyle intervention.
Individual carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) before and after 9 months of lifestyle intervention according to tertiles of changes in fasting serum trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) levels (p-value from the paired t test) in 220 subjects.
Figure 3Relationships of hepatic FMO3 mRNA expression with sex, age and adjusted HOMA-IR.
Relationship of hepatic FMO3 mRNA expression (normalized for the mRNA expression of the housekeeping gene RSP13) with gender (A) and age (B) and of hepatic FMO3 mRNA expression, adjusted for sex and gender, with the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in 55 patients who donated liver samples (C).