| Literature DB >> 31737073 |
Tiare Araya-Contreras1,2, Rhonda Veas1, Carlos A Escobar2, Pamela Machuca1, Mauricio Bittner1,3.
Abstract
Nosocomial infections caused by bacteria are one of the main public health problems. Moreover, the resistance to antibiotics by these bacteria makes it necessary to find new treatments to fight them. Objective. To evaluate the antibacterial activity of Luma apiculata (DC.) Burret extracts on bacteria of clinical importance. Materials and Methods. In this study, extracts were obtained at room temperature by successive extraction of L. apiculata leaves, flowers, and branches and treated separately with solvents of ascending polarity (i.e., hexane, methylene dichloride, ethyl acetate, ethanol, methanol, and water) to extract the compounds depending on their polarity. Then, the extract's antibacterial activity was tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Enterococcus sp, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. Results. The hexane extract of L. apiculata leaves resulted to be active against all bacteria tested. Among them, S. aureus showed to be the more susceptible, showing a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 120 μg/ml. In addition, a growth curve was performed, and colonies were counted. A decrease in bacterial growth was observed when the hexane extract of L. apiculata leaves was added. Besides, the hexane extracts of L. apiculata flowers resulted to be active against all Gram-positive tested bacteria. However, at higher concentrations, this extract resulted inactive for the Gram-negative bacteria tested. The hexane extract of L. apiculata branches resulted to be inactive in all cases. The extracts obtained treating separately leaves, flowers, or branches with solvents of major polarity than the hexane in a successive extraction of ascending polarity methodology resulted also to be inactive as an antimicrobial against all bacteria tested. Discussion/Conclusion. The hexane extract of L. apiculata leaves showed the lower MIC against S. aureus when compared with extracts obtained from other parts of the plant. The growth curve and the colonies count suggest a bacteriostatic activity of the L. apiculata leaves extract against Staphylococcus aureus.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31737073 PMCID: PMC6815527 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7803726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Yield and characteristics of leave's extracts with different solvents.
| Solvents | Yields | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Hexane | 0.5% | Pasty texture, yellow, strong smell |
| Methylene dichloride | 1.1% | Pasty texture, dark green, strong smell |
| Ethyl acetate | 0.5% | Grainy texture, black, odorless |
| Ethanol | 2.1% | Grainy texture, dark brown, strong smell |
| Methanol | 1.9% | Caramelized texture, dark brown, odorless |
| Water | 3.5% | Grainy texture, dark brown, soft smell |
Antimicrobial effect of different extracts of Luma apiculata in bacteria of clinical importance.
| Solvent | Extract | Gram positive | Gram negative | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Hexane | Leaves | >100 | >200 | >200 | >300 | >400 | >500 | >400 |
| Branches | N/E | N/E | ||||||
| Flowers | >300 | >500 | >500 | >300 | N/E | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Methylene dichloride | Leaves | N/E | N/E | |||||
| Branches | ||||||||
| Flowers | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Ethyl acetate | Leaves | N/E | N/E | |||||
| Branches | ||||||||
| Flowers | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Ethanol | Leaves | N/E | N/E | |||||
| Branches | ||||||||
| Flowers | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Methanol | Leaves | N/E | N/E | |||||
| Branches | ||||||||
| Flowers | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Water | Leaves | N/E | N/E | |||||
| Branches | ||||||||
| Flowers | ||||||||
N/E: no effect.
Figure 1Antimicrobial activity in BHI medium leaf extract Luma apiculata on growth curves of Gram-positive bacteria concentrations: 1 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml, 0.05 mg/ml, and 0.01 mg/ml (n=3).
Characterization of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus patient palatal lip.
| Strain | Gram | Catalase | Mannitol | Sensitivity to extract of | Sensitivity to penicillin (10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | I |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | S |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
|
| + | + | + | S | S |
|
| + | + | + | S | R |
Sensitivity: S (sensitive), R (resistant), and I (intermediate).
Figure 2Growth curve and count of colony-forming units of clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. The light blue bars correspond to the colony count without the extract of Luma apiculata 1 mg/mL. The yellow bars correspond to the colonies count with Luma apiculata extract of 1 mg/mL. In blue, the curve without extract of Luma apiculata is observed. In red, the curve is observed with extract of Luma apiculata of 1 mg/mL. The extract of Luma apiculata was incorporated after 150 minutes; n=3 (p < 0.005; p < 0.05).